Back to @nottjmiller's profile

t.j. miller engagement report

@nottjmiller - 252K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.009%
of 252K followers
Per impression
0.282%
8.3K views on a typical post
Reach
3.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 0.282% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 1368x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #token2049.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #bitcoin, #token2049.

Compared with accounts its own size

t.j. miller's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, t.j. miller sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link28% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 28% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 29, 20261368x their median

    Share this with someone that needs it! I believe in you! https://t.co/POhX6ktqGu

    26K5.6K537341521K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026288x their median

    Zach is doing the most uncomfortable version of his job on purpose and Bruce is doing the least amount of acting possible on purpose too https://t.co/cmIh74R7EG

    6.3K44810127818K viewsView on X
  • May 3, 20269.6x their median

    I have studied the beastie boys more than you have listened to the Beatles. I cannot figure out how they are so good. It’s a fucking mystery how they did what they did and do what they do. Miraculous. Sgt. Pepper’s lamely fart’s cub. Ill communication to the 5 boroughs and hot sauce at Paul’s Boutique.

    130357238K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20267.6x their median

    When things are at their darkest, that's when you stub your toe.

    16271408.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20266.7x their median

    Some guy on the subway said “are you T.J. Miller?” I affirmed, and he said “congratulations.” That’s not a common response. What would you have said back?

    93166117K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20266.0x their median

    My favorite idiocy right now is promotional contests that will make the fucking idiot doing it no money. Mr beast excluded. Just kidding. Best comment gets $800.

    73466121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.8x their median

    I need some new sauces, some good new sauces. Who’s got the divining rod?

    48089114K viewsView on X
  • Apr 17, 20265.5x their median

    Dude. Anaconda is the funniest movie in a WHILE. Very well much watch. T.J.

    89219115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.3x their median

    A great cook is better than a good chef.

    7142718.7K viewsView on X
  • May 7, 20264.5x their median

    Amazing- make it the way thru. https://t.co/UPmoVBoYIy

    864008.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin#token2049

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 252K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.3K times each, and 0.282% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 1368x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #token2049.

What is t.j. miller's engagement rate on X?
t.j. miller (@nottjmiller) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 251,548 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, t.j. miller sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nottjmiller have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @nottjmiller post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going