PlayerSells
Back to @norafawn's profile

nora 🌱 engagement report

@norafawn - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
3.63%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
5.19%
898K views on a typical post
Reach
69.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
47K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.373%
3.4K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 47K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 3.63%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 898K times each, and 5.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 69.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 292K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

nora 🌱's engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 3.63%, nora 🌱 sits above the 90th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.67% to 366.2%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length-+7%+4% to +10%7.0K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 46 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 7% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 2, 20266.3x their median

    スケッチ 歒まった https://t.co/rv3l2mKhnx

    269K22K1492623.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20263.2x their median

    Bro. https://t.co/qj4uSpgBJZ

    136K12K2213753.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.2x their median

    full body https://t.co/zboSJInBhO

    142K4.3K9404265.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20262.2x their median

    https://t.co/CmZo46rV1c

    100K3.0K47168913M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20261.9x their median

    https://t.co/Roq22rvZ2E

    84K2.2K8341842.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20261.8x their median

    new bikini https://t.co/MOwd8W7GRp

    81K2.4K963981.3M viewsView on X
  • May 31, 20261.7x their median

    12 years ago, a woman made and released a viral video documenting street harassment in New York. Liberals noticed, because their ability to notice only goes so far, that almost all of the catcallers shown were black or Hispanic. So they called her racist. To placate the mob, she suggested white men behaved similarly and promised the release of follow-up footage. She never did. For the obvious reason that it didn’t exist.

    73K5.4K7211564.8M viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20261.6x their median

    the streets feel like a maze https://t.co/X2sVzjUxMy

    70K4.2K6721.6K6.4M viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20261.5x their median

    https://t.co/aVmQQHj45J

    69K1.6K438791.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 2026

    https://t.co/Pfe7NCohRi

    57K7.0K816661.0M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 47K interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 3.63%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 898K times each, and 5.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 69.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 292K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

What is nora 🌱's engagement rate on X?
nora 🌱 (@norafawn) has an engagement rate of 3.63%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,285,232 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 3.63%, nora 🌱 sits above the 90th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @norafawn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @norafawn post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going