Back to @nocturnmachine's profile

nocturnal engagement report

@nocturnmachine - 238K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.855%
of 238K followers
Per impression
9.11%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
9.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.856%
192 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.855%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 9.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

nocturnal's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.855%, nocturnal sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 49 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 10, 202638x their median

    Who are you to judge? https://t.co/hwyAOUN0Cu

    70K7.9K65111924K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202620x their median

    It's time for some brutal honesty. https://t.co/14lIH6Da4o

    38K3.9K3680308K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202617x their median

    Who gave you the right to judge? https://t.co/3fdPPmCG7A

    31K3.8K1872235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20267.9x their median

    No curse is more twisted than love. https://t.co/At1Ykt1qHf

    14K1.9K931132K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.6x their median

    Don't just win Dominate.

    6.6K70451654K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20263.0x their median

    How do you destroy a monster without turning into one? https://t.co/N7A98VWpG1

    5.4K659632284K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.8x their median

    Wear a mask long enough, and you forget who you were beneath it. https://t.co/choJioSJcQ

    5.3K4345449K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.6x their median

    https://t.co/3aSE0JNTlY

    4.8K55231054K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.5x their median

    My turn. https://t.co/SpdkEl7jbw

    4.7K5285547K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.4x their median

    "Looks rough." "I'll live."

    4.4K4085740K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.855%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 9.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.

What is nocturnal's engagement rate on X?
nocturnal (@nocturnmachine) has an engagement rate of 0.855%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 237,628 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.855%, nocturnal sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nocturnmachine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @nocturnmachine post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going