Back to @noaheverett's profile

Noah engagement report

@noaheverett - 2.8M followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 2.8M followers
Per impression
0.15%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
0.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
27
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 2.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 4 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.652% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 172K interactions, about 5389x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Noah's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count. A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Noah sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 20255389x their median

    https://t.co/vPQNjn1NjX

    143K23K5.0K1.6K10M viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 20261393x their median

    If you know what this is, you had a real childhood https://t.co/I1G5JIfe3a

    32K3.2K1.3K8312.8M viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 2026447x their median

    British forces launch a full assault on Fort Sullivan, South Carolina. The position does not fall as quickly as they would have pleased; British cannon fire bounces off the Patriot Fort, which is constructed of palmetto logs. The British bullets cut down the militia flag, and young Patriot Sergeant William Jasper races to the pole and raises it under withering fire. Meanwhile, American fire does substantial damage to Royal Navy ships. Although 2,200 British troops and nine ships attacked a fort with only 400 militia inside, just 12 Patriots are killed for the loss of 91 British and severe damage to their ships. They do not take the Fort and they are compelled to retreat.

    11K89879652.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026297x their median

    we don’t talk nearly enough about boston dynamic’s sand flea robot https://t.co/Jtxt7WaRUv

    7.4K37716184693K viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 2026264x their median

    Sober people (no alcohol, nicotine, drugs, etc ever), what is your end of day or weekend "wind-down"?

    5.7K661.1K3194.1M viewsView on X
  • Apr 16, 2026193x their median

    Our @golang load balancer at @render handles more than 150 billion HTTP requests a month across millions of services. The number of times we've wanted to rewrite it in Rust: zero. Go is the most underrated language in infrastructure. "Boring" is the ultimate feature.

    4.7K28812956522K viewsView on X
  • Mar 19, 20266.3x their median

    https://t.co/SNfBM9VOm3

    1611522323K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 20263.8x their median

    10 years of Crystal. 10 years of Kemal⌛️ We went from a syntax experiment to a high-performance ecosystem 🚀 My latest blog post reflects on the road to v1.20 and why the "X" is still Crystal✍️ https://t.co/KNVPyfsV7W @CrystalLanguage @crystalkemal #crystallang

    31853112K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 20264.1x their median

    Eddy Cue just explained why Apple's credit card charges feel so random https://t.co/Lwvi9XhfYp by @ChanceHMiller

    10073130K viewsView on X
  • Jan 8, 20263.6x their median

    John Deere 4540 in a foggy field https://t.co/o4iPKS2NHy

    1484007.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 2.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 4 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.652% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 172K interactions, about 5389x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Noah's engagement rate on X?
Noah (@noaheverett) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,762,403 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Noah sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @noaheverett have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count, which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @noaheverett post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going