Back to @niyazee26's profile

Zeeshan Khan Niazi engagement report

@niyazee26 - 131K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.144%
of 131K followers
Per impression
6.29%
3.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
188
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 188 interactions against 131K followers, an engagement rate of 0.144%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 6.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Zeeshan Khan Niazi's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.144%, Zeeshan Khan Niazi sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video34% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 34% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 393 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202616x their median

    عمران حکومت نے پی ڈی ایم کے رہنماؤں کو مہنگائی کے خلاف اسلام آباد تک مارچ اور احتجاج کی اجازت دی تھی جو ان کا آئینی حق تھا۔ اب شہباز حکومت نے ان کو احتجاج کی اجازت نا دے کر اسی آئینی حق کی خلاف ورزی کی ہے جو ایک غیر جمہوری قدم ہے

    2.4K5091743649K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.7x their median

    ٹاس ہم جیتے ہمارے مرضی بیٹنگ کریں یا بالنگ کریں، وزیر اعلی خیبرپختونخوا سہیل آفریدی

    9071352359.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.3x their median

    اقتدار تو مسلم لیگ اور پیپلزپارٹی کے پاس بھی ہے وزراء اعلی تو مریم نواز، مراد علی شاہ اور سرفراز بگٹی بھی ہیں لیکن میڈیا پر تسلسل کےساتھ @PTIofficial اور @SohailAfridiISF چھائے ہوئے ہیں! کیا سیاسی حوالے سے یہ پی ٹی آئی کی جیت نہیں؟

    765971221934K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20265.0x their median

    گھٹیا ترین شخص کی یہی نشانی ہوتی ہے کہ اُس کی زبان نہایت گھٹیا نیچ اور غلیظ ہوتی ہے https://t.co/cQ5AXp5jll

    6541451133733K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20264.8x their median

    مخدوم شہاب بتارہے ہیں کہ وزیراعظم نے شاندار انداز میں دنیا کا مقدمہ پیش کیا ہے،سب کی نظریں پاکستان پر ہیں،چینی صدر نے بھی ٹرمپ کو کہا ہے کہ اسلام آباد اکارڈ سے رجوع کرو https://t.co/GHuQ1iAOpl

    662106993698K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.7x their median

    انیق ناجی کو اگر کوئی عہدہ دے دیا جاتا تو ن لیگ سے بہتر کوئی جماعت نہیں تھی نہ ہی ن لیگی رہنماؤں سے عظیم رہنما کوئی ہوتا۔ابھی کُچھ عرصہ پہلے تک یہ پوری ن لیگ سے متعلق قصیدے لکھ رہے تھے جب کوئی عہدہ نہ ملا تو انقلابی ہوگئے۔

    5641002244.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.6x their median

    پی ٹی آئی کا ایک ایک بندہ غلاظت سے بھرا ہوا ہے پھر ان کو جنگلی کہو تو موت پڑتی ہے بے شرم گھٹیا https://t.co/1dUVmySGxp

    385653145.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.0x their median

    کُچھ لوگوں کی رائے ہے کہ کےپی میں گورنر راج لگا تو پی ٹی آئی کو اپنی حکومتی کارکردگی سے جان چھڑانے اور دفاع کا موقع مل جائے گا،تو سوال یہ ہے کہ پچھلی دو بار حکومت اُن کو کارکردگی دکھانے پر ملی ہے؟؟اس کا جواب ہے نہیں۔گورنر راج لگانا اس لیے ضروری ہے کیونکہ اب ایک صوبے کی حکومت وفاق پر حملہ آور ہے دہشتگردوں کے خلاف وہ کوئی ردعمل نہیں دیتے سہولتکاری مہیا کرتے ہیں شہدا کے جنازوں میں نہیں جاتے کیونکہ ان کے اتحادی خوارج ناراض نہ ہوجائیں ایسے وقت میں ریاست کو اُس صوبے میں ایسی انتظامیہ چاہیے جو دہشتگردوں کا سدباب کرے۔اگر یہ لوگ ایسے ہی کرتے رہے تو آپ ایک صوبے کو اجازت دے رہے ہیں کہ وہ ریاست کی پالیسیوں کے خلاف جاتی رہے اور ملک کا نقصان کرے۔

    29276813.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.9x their median

    لانگ مارچ کبھی مسئلہ ہی نہیں تھا چاہے وہ اسے مؤخر کریں یا نہ کریں اس سے کوئی فرق نہیں پڑتا۔اصل مسئلہ پی ٹی آئی اور سہیل آفریدی کی مجرمانہ غفلت اور اس سے بھی بڑھ کر فتنہ الخوارج اور دہشت گردوں کے ساتھ ان کی ملی بھگت ہے جس نے پورے خیبر پختونخوا کو یرغمال بنا رکھا ہے۔یہ پی ٹی آئی-ٹی ٹی پی گٹھ جوڑ کوئی عام سیاسی غلطی نہیں،اس کی قیمت ہمارے شہداء اپنے خون سے ادا کر رہے ہیں۔روز آرمی اور پولیس کے جوان اسی دہشت گردی کے ہاتھوں شہید ہو رہے ہیں جس کو کے پی حکومت کی سرپرستی حاصل ہے۔صوبہ جل رہا ہے، دہشت گردی عروج پر ہے، اور کے پی حکومت اسلام آباد پر چڑھائی کے خواب دیکھ رہی ہے یہ ناقابل برداشت ہے اور اب مزید نہیں چل سکتا۔دہشت گردوں کے سہولت کار، یہ ٹیرر سپانسر پی ٹی آئی حکومت اب جانی چاہیے۔ خیبر پختونخوا کو بچانے کے لیے اس حکومت کا خاتمہ ناگزیر ہو چکا ہے۔

    28670203.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261.7x their median

    علیمہ خان کی گرفتاری بالکل اُسی طرح ہوئی ہے جیسے حماداظہر کی یعنی کہ فرمائشی گرفتاری ہے لانگ مارچ سے بچنے کے لیے۔یاد رہے کہ ان کے بیٹوں کی بھی ضمانتیں فوراً ہوگئی تھیں جبکہ باقی کسی بھی پی ٹی آئی کارکنان کی ضمانت نہیں ہوسکی۔ https://t.co/2HAoIVEm4X

    24079603.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 188 interactions against 131K followers, an engagement rate of 0.144%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 6.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Zeeshan Khan Niazi's engagement rate on X?
Zeeshan Khan Niazi (@niyazee26) has an engagement rate of 0.144%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 130,722 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.144%, Zeeshan Khan Niazi sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @niyazee26 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @niyazee26 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going