Back to @ninoboxer's profile

David Nino Rodriguez engagement report

@ninoboxer - 324K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.049%
of 324K followers
Per impression
1.81%
8.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
158
interactions (median)
Saved
0.063%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 158 interactions against 324K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 1.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

David Nino Rodriguez's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.049%, David Nino Rodriguez sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video61% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link37% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 61% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 37% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 202661x their median

    Huma Abedin - Barack Obama John Podesta- B. Affleck - Nancy Pelosi. Share This! https://t.co/WmnPoRwfJm

    6.3K3.0K167115464K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202618x their median

    Not only could midterms be halted and delayed.. Trump could remain in office until after 2030. Have a nice day 🙃

    2.4K2441582133K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202618x their median

    I’m not sure if I speak for all addicts, but I can definitely speak for myself on this… One thing that is a constant burden and plagues recovery while making sobriety a challenge is my nervous system. My nerves always feel jolted which make trying to relax grueling I’m constantly in a state of high adrenaline, alert and anxiety with my nerves on overdrive. This has subdued to a degree over time, but panic attacks and night terrors still occur. Please pray for me

    2.1K1225621436K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.8x their median

    34 https://t.co/FdGlHmAMk6

    1.1K201107932K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.6x their median

    I’m done with the NFL. This male cheerleader shit is beyond insanity. They have no shame. WTF do you tell your kids when they see this garbage?

    95198138716K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.4x their median

    https://t.co/1m0UmaePd6

    66216219716K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.3x their median

    Folks, something isn't right with Lindsay Clancy's husband... https://t.co/xfxr74uCZc

    43983148430K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.2x their median

    6G will be used to activate the Graphene Oxide in the vaccines. You will lose your cognitive liberty.

    43982130824K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.2x their median

    Trump Orders Shock Voter Fraud Crackdown in Nine States, Including: WA, WI, MO, GA, CA, PA, NV, NY and CT

    406633658.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.0x their median

    Absolute 🔥 podcast!!! Tina Peters lawyer and friend to Trump, Peter Ticktin joins https://t.co/oB9l9gG8Su to explain how we stopped the steal in 2024 and what the globalist plans are for the midterms and beyond. This is unbelievably informative folks. I’m speechless!!!!!!! Get to https://t.co/oB9l9gG8Su now for a 2 dollar membership

    34011213314K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 158 interactions against 324K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 1.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.

What is David Nino Rodriguez's engagement rate on X?
David Nino Rodriguez (@ninoboxer) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 324,031 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.049%, David Nino Rodriguez sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ninoboxer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ninoboxer post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going