Back to @niki_poojary's profile

Nikita Poojary engagement report

@niki_poojary - 170K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 170K followers
Per impression
0.379%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
6.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
44
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 170K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.379% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 691 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Nikita Poojary's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, Nikita Poojary sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 73 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202616x their median

    NIFTY & its love for 24k https://t.co/y3xPEUvMcl

    6274219323K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202611x their median

    #JustIN | No plans to review, change or stop closing auction session framework; #SEBI has urged brokers to enhance retail participation in CAS : Sources to @YashJain88 https://t.co/IfygQWwkvt

    2724110461120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.7x their median

    With draconian F&O regulations and ever rising STT, the government is slowly pushing retail towards crypto the most unregulated and dangerous asset class. Wouldn’t be surprised if the next retail crisis comes from crypto.

    3242729116K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20267.3x their median

    NIFTY is heading for its 9th consecutive red week. The last similar streak was Feb-Apr 2001. The very next week, NIFTY surged 15.92%, and the move from the low reached 20.48%. Strongly watching for a sharp bullish reversal from here. 📈

    265746331K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.2x their median

    So for 360 minutes we supposedly couldn't discover the "true" price… But apparently 15 minutes after normal trading ends is enough to discover it. The irony is that regulators are supposed to design markets that reduce opportunities for manipulation.

    1551316112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20264.2x their median

    #NIFTY Still within the March month lows & highs Outlook for the week Aug 9 - 14, 2026: THREAD: Deconstructing NIFTY on 4 different TF's.

    162185047K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.4x their median

    Now I understand why it's called CAS. Apparently, it stands for CASino. 🎲

    125916013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.7x their median

    As if CAS was not enough tradingview is showing an even worse closing on SENSEX https://t.co/HqypJSl70d

    100512020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.4x their median

    If the most important price of the day can be disproportionately influenced by activity concentrated into a 15 minute window, shouldn't that mechanism be scrutinised? Does CAS actually improve price discovery, or does it simply create a new window for price manipulation?

    90512010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.4x their median

    A trader takes risk knowing that the outcome is uncertain. That doesn't make it satta Criticise reckless leverage but calling an entire profession “sattebaaz” is lazy &irresponsible Financial journalism should educate people abt markets, not shame people who participate in them

    9168110K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 44 interactions against 170K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.379% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 691 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Nikita Poojary's engagement rate on X?
Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 169,817 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, Nikita Poojary sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @niki_poojary have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @niki_poojary post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going