Nick Sortor engagement report
@nicksortor - 1.6M followers on X
Measured over 473 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 7.4K interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.454%. Measured over 473 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 116K times each, and 6.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 19.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 473 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 120K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.
Measured over 473 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Nick Sortor's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.454%, Nick Sortor sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 380 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 4, 202616x their median
🚨 BREAKING — IT'S OVER: The judge in the Lindsay Clancy case has OFFICIALLY declared a mistrial The Ku Klux Klancy folks FAILED to free Clancy, thanks to ONE LEGENDARY MAN, who spent 7 DAYS being yelled at by 9 mentally ill women and 2 beta cuck men. THANK YOU, SIR! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/6tdecUatnu
- Aug 24, 202615x their median
🚨 HOLY CRAP! Former NBA star Enes Kanter Freedom was just EJECTED from a WNBA game for wearing a shirt with the definition of “WOMAN” on it You’re a freaking LEGEND, @EnesFreedom 🔥 ENES: “I just got kicked out of a @WNBA game for supporting WOMEN! Let that sink in, AMERICA!” https://t.co/c0VUDvVbQO
- Aug 19, 202614x their median
🚨 BREAKING: GOP Rep. Cory Mills, who cast the deciding vote AGAINST removing Ilhan Omar from her committees for justifying Charlie Kirk's murder, has LOST his primary to Ryan Elijah Good riddance. Ilhan Omar should have ZERO committee positions, let alone a seat in Congress. https://t.co/7ET3yrt4pQ
- Sep 22, 202613x their median
🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump just called out the UN globalists for attempting to FORCE mass migration to the west "With your CEASELESS promotion of mass migration, these globalists are actively DESTROYING the greatest cultures and most extraordinary heritage in all of history." "They want the worst people to come in from the WORST places on earth and we don't do it anymore." "There is NO HUMAN RIGHT to illegal immigration, but there is a right to remain a SOVEREIGN NATION." ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. TORCH them, 47! RE-MIGRATION NOW!
- Sep 18, 202613x their median
🔥 LMAO! President Trump just SHOT BACK at the Fake News reporters whining about being banned from the White House "Look at the way you treated Biden. He went a YEAR AND A HALF without having a press conference. A year and a half!" "And what was the question you asked him most? 'What is your favorite flavored ice cream?'" "I heard that question so many times!" 😂
- Aug 24, 202613x their median
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump confirms “ICE ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS” being taken against Ilhan Omar, who was allegedly a participant in immigration fraud by marrying her BROTHER LFG!!! Send her back to Somalia! 🔥 AG Todd Blanche is rumored to be on the case, which could result in Omar being STRIPPED of her citizenship. HELL YES!
- Oct 14, 202613x their median
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump just announced FULL UNCONDITIONAL PARDONS for three Alaskans charged with FIXING ENGINES "They want to put them in jail for 10 YEARS because they fixed an engine. How SICK" "If you MURDER somebody, no problem! Unless a Republican does the murdering. Then it's, you know, the electric chair, right?" "I'm giving each one of the three an UNCONDITIONAL pardon." This is AMAZING. Biden's EPA tried putting these mechanics in prison, but Trump is giving them their FULL FREEDOM back. 🇺🇸
- Sep 1, 202613x their median
🚨 BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy jury has just told the judge they CANNOT reach a unanimous verdict in the murder trial This is INSANE. She KlLLED her children. She literally ADMITS that. The judge sent them back to TRY AGAIN. https://t.co/RHg1qVKZ5U
- Oct 6, 202612x their median
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump announces a NEW BILL to PERMANENTLY lock down our borders. "We will pass the NO INVASION OF OUR COUNTRY Act, prohibiting ANY future president from EVER opening our borders to illegal immigrants EVER AGAIN." We should go even further with this -- it should be a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. If we allow open borders ever again -- like we did under the Biden years -- our country is GONE. And that's EXACTLY what the Democrats want. WE NEED AN IMPENETRABLE WALL OF STEEL at both the southern AND norther borders, and attempts to invade need to be met with deadIy force. NO MORE MESSING AROUND!
- Sep 15, 202612x their median
🔥 LMAO! FBI Director Patel just MIC DROPPED Democrat Sen. Welch while Welch was badgering him PATEL: "Are you done with your campaign ad?" "By the way, I want to know how your wealth increased 4,000% since you became a United States Senator. That's a magic act ALL Americans should be able to know." 🤣
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 7.4K interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.454%. Measured over 473 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 116K times each, and 6.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 19.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 473 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 120K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.
- What is Nick Sortor's engagement rate on X?
- Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) has an engagement rate of 0.454%, based on the median interactions across 473 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,632,880 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.454%, Nick Sortor sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @nicksortor have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @nicksortor post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 19.4 posts per day across the measured window.