Nick shirley engagement report
@nickshirleyy - 1.8M followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 111K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 6.21%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.1M times each, and 9.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 64.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 80% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 210K interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Nick shirley's engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 6.21%, Nick shirley sits above the 90th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.67% to 366.2%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.001% |
| 25th percentile | 0.006% |
| 50th percentile | 0.046% |
| 75th percentile | 0.318% |
| 90th percentile | 2.67% |
| 99th percentile | 366.2% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | 0% | 14K |
| 01:00 UTC | +3% | 15K |
| 02:00 UTC | -1% | 14K |
| 03:00 UTC | -2% | 15K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 12K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 12K |
| 06:00 UTC | -7% | 13K |
| 07:00 UTC | -6% | 14K |
| 08:00 UTC | -7% | 16K |
| 09:00 UTC | -2% | 19K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 20K |
| 11:00 UTC | -2% | 22K |
| 12:00 UTC | -1% | 24K |
| 13:00 UTC | +1% | 27K |
| 14:00 UTC | -2% | 28K |
| 15:00 UTC | -1% | 30K |
| 16:00 UTC | -1% | 29K |
| 17:00 UTC | -1% | 28K |
| 18:00 UTC | +1% | 25K |
| 19:00 UTC | 0% | 23K |
| 20:00 UTC | 0% | 21K |
| 21:00 UTC | +1% | 19K |
| 22:00 UTC | +1% | 16K |
| 23:00 UTC | +1% | 15K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +9% | 56K |
| Monday | +8% | 72K |
| Tuesday | +1% | 93K |
| Wednesday | -4% | 77K |
| Thursday | -3% | 70K |
| Friday | -6% | 71K |
| Saturday | +2% | 62K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +79% | +73% to +84% | 5.7K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -49% | -50% to -47% | 6.0K |
| Typical length | - | +12% | +10% to +15% | 6.3K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 404 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 12% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 7, 20261.9x their median
🚨 Meet Doris, she lives in California and is registered as a 126 year old who has voted in 51 elections and has NO IDEA. California’s voting system is so corrupt that by simply knocking on the door of the “126 year old” proves election fraud. EXPOSE IT ALL. https://t.co/5WEaFKem3P
- Jun 28, 20261.8x their median
Expose so much fraud and a government so corrupt they have to make a law to try and stop you Welcome to Califraudia https://t.co/1ZoktNZep2
- Jul 16, 20261.7x their median
Imagine this: you get paid by our tax dollars and you don’t even show up to do your job when it involves our tax dollars being stolen. Wtf are these people doing in office if they don’t even care about our money being stolen and wasted? They are simply working against us. https://t.co/kSIgcPrYKE
- Jun 2, 2026
🚨 This is a prime example of fraud and waste inside California's homeless industrial complex California bought this hotel for $8 million in 2020 and now wants $20 million to fix it. That is $625,000 per homeless person. 6 years later and NOTHING to show. EXPOSE IT ALL. https://t.co/4zHPmZKyPk
- Jun 30, 2026
🚨 Today the California Senate Committee held a hearing on the “Stop Nick Shirley Act,” known as AB 2624. This bill will criminalize and punish anyone from looking into fraud inside immigrant communities in California. This bill was created only after I exposed billions of dollars in fraud throughout immigrant communities in the US. “Immigration support services” have become a billion dollar industry in California, and now that the fraud has been exposed, they are trying to criminalize those who look into the fraud. The bill has passed through the California Assembly and is set to pass through the Senate and then to Governor Newsom’s desk. This bill was created by the Attorney Generals WIFE and will allow him to go after citizens if they film nonprofits and “immigration support services providers”. Welcome to Califraudia.
- Jul 10, 2026
🚨 Here is the full 53 minutes of my crew and I exposing New York fraud, we uncovered over $190,000,000 in fraud as these fraudsters use the elderly and needy to commit fraud through adult and personal home care scams in NYC. Your tax dollars are paying for elderly Koreans and Chinese to play ping pong and do tai chi, while the fraudsters give $ kickbacks to those who enroll. Like it and share this video, the fraud must STOP. We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for fraudsters to steal from our pockets. These fraudsters have been able to defraud American taxpayers for years without any pushback from the public and politicians. Time is up. EXPOSE IT ALL AND END THE FRAUD.
- Jul 27, 2026
Fun fact: Ilhan Omar’s net worth went from $30,000,000 to $95,000 after the Learing Centers were exposed. That is a 99.68% decrease, she blames it on an “accounting” error. Ilhan and her accountant are certified LEARERS, I hope the book helps 🙏🏼 https://t.co/d81HzT9EXN
- Aug 18, 2026
So much fraud and waste in one state that you could spend a lifetime and never find it all. Expose it and they will create laws against you. Welcome to the Califraudia Republic https://t.co/LmUBQymfv6
- Aug 2, 2026
Spain, I’ve come to assess the situation. The West must stand strong or fall. https://t.co/KabYEIphUS
- Jun 4, 2026
🚨 Please watch: While casually walking in NYC, a man goes unhinged by my presence. He yells and screams that I am “Islamophobic and racist” but can’t give one example. Shouts “someone is going to find you” while signaling a gunshot to the head. “I want you to go into any leftist organization and show them my photo and they will know who I am” he yells when I ask him how he has helped society. Uncovering fraud and helping America has become the most dangerous job in America, unfortunately.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 111K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 6.21%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.1M times each, and 9.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 64.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 80% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 210K interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post.
- What is Nick shirley's engagement rate on X?
- Nick shirley (@nickshirleyy) has an engagement rate of 6.21%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,787,871 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 6.21%, Nick shirley sits above the 90th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @nickshirleyy have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @nickshirleyy post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.