Nick Gerli engagement report
@nickgerli1 - 163K followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 975 interactions against 163K followers, an engagement rate of 0.599%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 1.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 40.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Nick Gerli's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.599%, Nick Gerli sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,570 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.699%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.699% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 89% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 89% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 727 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 11, 20263.1x their median
Wow. North of Dallas is getting smoked. I lived in Frisco back in 2022 and everyone said the market was impervious to a decline. And now it’s in free fall. Some zips are down almost 20% on value already. And inventory through the roof. More correction coming in Collin and Denton County in 2027. Search your zip trends at https://t.co/S3BIG9AdEw
- Oct 7, 20262.6x their median
The U.S. mortgage market is in its biggest recession in U.S. history. Applications to purchase a home are down 58% from the pandemic peak in 2021. Today's mortgage purchase index of 145 today is lower than at any point in the 2009-2012 housing bust. And is now back the same level as 1995. Not only that, mortgage applications are also down 15% from last year, indicating a further short-term weakening is occuring. Roughly 70% of U.S. home purchases are financed with a mortgage. So declining mortgage applications are going to be a big problem for sellers. Track the areas with the biggest negative forecasts at: https://t.co/42D6apFdHs
- Sep 16, 20262.4x their median
U.S. Mortgage Applications just fell back to the lowest level since 1995. And are now down 50% from the pandemic peak. Demand to buy with a mortgage today is shockingly at the same level as 31 years ago, even though U.S. population is 30% higher. The reason demand is so low is due to sky-high home prices, which are in a massive bubble. To go along with sky-high prices, mortgage rates are now back to normal at 7%. Meaning the vast majority of buyers can't afford it, with the typical household needing to spend nearly 40% of their gross income on house payments. This historic demand collapse will not improve until home prices drop meaningfully. And the situation is becoming especially dire in America's highest cost markets. Check your ZIP on Reventure to see where your market ranks: https://t.co/f4qNQ29CIP
- Oct 14, 20262.2x their median
The U.S. housing market is experiencing one of the worst homebuyer demand recessions in history. Mortgage purchase applications have collapsed 60% from their pandemic peak. Demand is now back near 1995 levels, and even lower than at any point during the 2008-2012 housing crash. Think about that. There are fewer mortgage purchase applications today than during the worst years of the foreclosure crisis. Homebuyers have effectively gone on strike. And that's a big problem for sellers. Because roughly 70% of home purchases are financed with a mortgage. And that's likely to put even more downward pressure on home prices. The silver lining? It's a great time to make low ball offers, and pick up houses at big discounts in late 2026. To see where mortgages have dropped most, search your ZIP on Reventure: https://t.co/LPkpGqrkKf
- Oct 20, 20262.2x their median
U.S. Housing Market sales just hit the lowest level ever in September 2026. The NAR's pending sales index just fell to 66.0. Which is the worst reading ever recorded. 50% lower than the pandemic peak, 35% lower than 2019 levels, and lower than any period during the 2008-09 downturn. Homebuyers are boycotting the housing market due to excessively high prices, and mortgage rates back above 7%. Meaning the U.S. remains mired in the biggest homebuyer recession in history, and it just got worse (sales down 11% YoY). The upside here is it's now a good time to make low ball offers on houses. Especially in markets with high inventory. Track demand and supply metrics for your ZIP at: https://t.co/MptYLJA8DH
- Aug 31, 20261.9x their median
The reason the U.S. has a housing affordability crisis isn't because of mortgage rates. Today's mortgage rate levels of around 6.5% as historically very normal. With the long-term 136 year average at 6.4%. Moreover, today's rates are way below where they were in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s, when mortgage rates were hovering near 10%. Meaning that central issue with affordability today isn't mortgage rates. Rather, it's prices. Real home prices are 90% above long-term averages. Indicating that housing has appreciated way faster than inflation and people's incomes. Which is ultimately what is creating this four-year housing recession with record low demand. Fix the price problem, and you fix affordability. Check the most overvalued areas at: https://t.co/zlKe2138Ij.
- Sep 3, 20261.8x their median
There's only been three home-price bubbles in U.S. history over the last 70 years. Today, with a Home Price/Income Ratio of 4.33x Back in 2006, when it hit 4.45x. And post WW2, when it hit 5.00x. In the previous two cases, the bubble and lack of affordability didn't last long. After 2006, prices crashed shortly thereafter, restoring the Home Price/Income to normal levels (below 3.5x). Meanwhile, after WW2, home prices stopped growing for a decade, while incomes surged 5-10% per year. Pushing the Value/Income Ratio below 3.0x, to its most affordable level ever. Indicating that there are two sides to the affordability coin: prices, and incomes. Check Value/Income for your ZIP on Reventure Premium now: https://t.co/hEz5qenRCp
- Oct 8, 20261.8x their median
We're starting to see 2008-level discounts in Florida's housing market. Take this condo. Owner bought for $220,000 in 2024. Now pending at a $138,000 asking price in 2026. A staggering 38% decline in two years. Down to $107 PSF. But here's where things get more interesting. Zillow estimates this condo could rent for $2,000/month, equating to a staggering 18% gross annual rental yield. However, the HOA fee is $780/month, significantly denting net rental returns. We haven't seen discounts like this in Florida in nearly a decade. But the cost of HOA, property taxes, and insurance in is still making it difficult for buyers. To see how much to offer on properties like this, use Reventure's listing analyzer: https://t.co/mxvaVVQ2fN
- Sep 17, 20261.6x their median
Major housing deflation is taking place in the homebuilding sector. Lennar, the 2nd largest builder in America, has now cut net prices 30% from the pandemic peak. Dropping from $511,000 in 2022 to $359,000 in Q3 2026. Lennar is cutting prices so much that their current ASP on new orders is below pre-pandemic levels. They're achieving this through outright price cuts, mortgage rate buydowns, and smaller floor plans. Ultimately, great news for buyers. Bad news if you're a re-seller in a market where Lennar operates. To see where prices are dropping most, search your ZIP at: https://t.co/XfJoGbKuB8
- Oct 8, 20261.6x their median
One of America's hottest downtown housing markets is now experiencing an all-out crash. Condo prices in Nashville are in free fall. On this listing, the seller bought for $699k in 2024. And is now listing at $499k. A $200k loss in a little over two years. Across the 37203 Nashville ZIP code, values are down 11% from peak on average. And I'm frequently finding seller's taking six-figure losses. This condo is now approaching its 2020 sale price ($480k), essentially erasing a majority of the pandemic appreciation. Some of these units could soon be a 'Buy'. The question is, how much lower does it go? Know how much to offer with Reventure's listing analyzer: https://t.co/qwBLTvSfAs
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 975 interactions against 163K followers, an engagement rate of 0.599%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 1.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 40.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 89% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 3.1x its own typical post.
- What is Nick Gerli's engagement rate on X?
- Nick Gerli (@nickgerli1) has an engagement rate of 0.599%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 162,739 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.599%, Nick Gerli sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,570 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @nickgerli1 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @nickgerli1 post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.