Back to @nice_ni89's profile

nananice engagement report

@nice_ni89 - 288K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 288K followers
Per impression
0.367%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
40
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 288K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.367% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.9K interactions, about 247x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

nananice's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, nananice sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video47% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 47% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 62 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 27, 2026247x their median

    น้ำหีคือเยอะมากอะ สงสัยเก็บมานาน 💗 *________________* แอคล็อค 100 ถาวร แอค vip เปิดหน้า 400 ถาวร เทเรแกรม 400 ถาวร สนใจ ทักแชทมานะคะ https://t.co/Y8dyLyzO2s

    8.0K1.8K645468K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202669x their median

    น้ำเต็มกี https://t.co/oGFEgrbh5F

    2.5K23325218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202666x their median

    เชื่อไหม ว่าแว่นคนนี้เลียนมตัวเองได้ https://t.co/oqCwi4lLrE

    2.4K2958043K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202653x their median

    เลียได้มั้ย https://t.co/NkEWq5jSoF

    1.9K15849117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202624x their median

    แล้วพี่จะน้ำราดตรงไหน https://t.co/sYW3pWOqij

    8161261017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20269.7x their median

    นั่นเห็นตูดใช่ไหม ปล. ตูดเลอะเจล https://t.co/GolyKCXpg7

    367182011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20268.2x their median

    ก้นแว่น เป็นไงบ้างคะ https://t.co/syOxbeccho

    28931603.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.3x their median

    ไม่ใช่หนูนะคะ เงินที่โอนให้คือโอนให้โจรหนูไม่มีแอ็คล็อคไม่มีช่องทางอื่น หนูไลฟ์อย่างเดียวหากอยากสนับสนุนหนูจริงๆติดตามหนูในไลฟ์ได้นะคะ หนูไม่รู้เหมือนกันหนูไปทำอะไรให้เขาเขาถึงทำหนูขนาดนี้ไม่รู้จักกันเป็นการส่วนตัวก๊อปรูปก๊อปวิดีโอทุกทางที่เจอรักชอบหนูให้ติดตามในไลฟ์และกดรีพอทมัน https://t.co/fkmWB6bhIv

    463013425K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    แล้วแชทเงียบจัง

    382009.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    แง่งง ขาดอีก 1300 แล้วคะ ยังไม่ทันจะได้หาค่าข้าวเลยยย 🥹

    3211011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 288K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.367% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.9K interactions, about 247x its own typical post.

What is nananice's engagement rate on X?
nananice (@nice_ni89) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 288,222 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, nananice sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nice_ni89 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @nice_ni89 post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going