Back to @ngnchiikawa's profile

ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘ engagement report

@ngnchiikawa - 5.8M followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
11.0%
of 5.8M followers
Per impression
2.75%
23M views on a typical post
Reach
401.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
644K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.07%
17K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 644K interactions against 5.8M followers, an engagement rate of 11.0%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 23M times each, and 2.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 401.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 997K interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ๆ˜ ็”ปใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #ๆ˜ ็”ปใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚.

Compared with accounts its own size

ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘'s engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 11.0%, ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘ sits above the 90th percentile of the 196,795 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.51% to 82.5%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.139%
p750.661%
p902.51%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 196,795 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 23,585 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.139%
75th percentile0.661%
90th percentile2.51%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 33 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 20261.6x their median

    ๐Ÿบ https://t.co/4Rmrmm3oyp

    830K135K3.0K30K38M viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    ๐Ÿ’ซ https://t.co/iyl8l6VnzQ

    677K85K1.6K14K18M viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    ๐Ÿœ https://t.co/zkDN3kXxus

    645K84K2.1K18K21M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    ๐Ÿบ https://t.co/7dWMqBlb6m

    623K84K2.4K22K25M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    โญ๏ธ https://t.co/YH0oUZpExu

    624K73K1.5K12K23M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    ๐Ÿ’ซ https://t.co/xTiDRMtDJ2

    605K64K6585.4K22M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    โญ๏ธ https://t.co/PGwo41CeYz

    586K66K1.2K8.6K23M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    โญ๏ธ https://t.co/qIn8fg7Hj0

    563K70K2.1K18K30M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    ๐Ÿ™Œ https://t.co/tGxrEbd2bb

    555K89K5946.3K14M viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 2026

    ๐Ÿ™Œ https://t.co/l4rPAezVUO

    563K70K1.5K9.1K13M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ๆ˜ ็”ปใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚#ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚#ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚#ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚ใ•ใŒใ—ใฆใพใ™#ใกใ„ใฝใ‘

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 644K interactions against 5.8M followers, an engagement rate of 11.0%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 23M times each, and 2.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 401.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 997K interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ๆ˜ ็”ปใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚.

What is ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘'s engagement rate on X?
ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘ (@ngnchiikawa) has an engagement rate of 11.0%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,839,742 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 11.0%, ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘ sits above the 90th percentile of the 196,795 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ngnchiikawa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ngnchiikawa post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going