Back to @ngnchiikawa's profile

ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘ engagement report

@ngnchiikawa - 5.4M followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.674%
of 5.4M followers
Per impression
0.849%
4.3M views on a typical post
Reach
79.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.108%
4.6K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.97/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 36K interactions against 5.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.674%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 4.3M times each, and 0.849% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 79.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 549K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ๆ˜ ็”ปใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #ๆ˜ ็”ปใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚.

Compared with accounts its own size

ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘'s engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.674%, ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘ sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.431% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 202615x their median

    ๐Ÿฆ‘ https://t.co/cN8tAuuQd2

    481K58K1.3K9.4K18M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202613x their median

    ๐Ÿš https://t.co/qMslhfUKi3

    425K40K1.3K6.8K19M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202613x their median

    ๐Ÿ’ซ https://t.co/CDZyN2vmCt

    393K50K1.3K10K34M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202612x their median

    ๐Ÿš https://t.co/NCynZvlkDo

    397K40K1.1K5.0K12M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202612x their median

    ๐Ÿš— https://t.co/RykRxYwmLl

    378K47K1.5K7.9K25M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202612x their median

    ๐Ÿˆ https://t.co/QV1YNBwpK7

    365K50K2.0K15K40M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202611x their median

    ๐Ÿš https://t.co/b2F9rU4DYS

    358K38K1.2K4.7K17M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202611x their median

    ๐Ÿš https://t.co/sX0mpOxyNE

    340K33K1.0K5.4K16M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202610x their median

    ๐Ÿ  https://t.co/4ViVdtfhIu

    331K39K7663.9K14M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20269.6x their median

    ๐Ÿจ https://t.co/enIzKiNAez

    311K32K1.3K3.7K18M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ๆ˜ ็”ปใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚#ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚#ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚#ใกใ„ใฝใ‘#ใกใ„ใฝใ‘ใญใถใŸ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36K interactions against 5.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.674%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 4.3M times each, and 0.849% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 79.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 549K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ๆ˜ ็”ปใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚, #ใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒกใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚.

What is ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘'s engagement rate on X?
ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘ (@ngnchiikawa) has an engagement rate of 0.674%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,371,013 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.674%, ใกใ„ใ‹ใ‚๐Ÿ’ซใ‚ขใƒ‹ใƒก็ซ้‡‘ sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ngnchiikawa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ngnchiikawa post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going