Back to @ng_ukraine's profile

НГУ engagement report

@ng_ukraine - 298K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 298K followers
Per impression
2.71%
4.2K views on a typical post
Reach
1.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
114
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 2.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 57% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 696 interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

НГУ's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, НГУ sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,864 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,191 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 260 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 20266.1x their median

    🇺🇦 Різноманітний улов на Донеччині. Спочатку воїни ЦСП «Омега» виявили скупчення особового складу противника – мінуснули. Потім знищили ро*ійський НРК. І вишенька на торті – антени підсилення сигналу для ворожих дронів, які після ударів не зможуть функціонувати. https://t.co/3KCqaCuDX4

    616772114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.1x their median

    За минулу добу (27.08.2026) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив: особовий склад ❌ 1 630 танки 💥 3 артилерійські системи 💥 55 РСЗВ 💥 2 засоби ППО 💥 3 НРК 💥 16 автотехніка та цистерни 💥 493 У четвер кількість бойових зіткнень збільшилась. https://t.co/9vx4g49URW

    391591034.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.7x their median

    За минулу добу (29.08.2026) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив:   особовий склад ❌ 1 400 танки 💥 1 бойові бронемашини 💥 7 артилерійські системи 💥 59 РСЗВ 💥 2 засоби ППО 💥 1 НРК 💥 6 автотехніка та цистерни 💥 394   У суботу кількість бойових зіткнень знизилась. https://t.co/c1RKipuMMY

    35856924.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.7x their median

    За минулу добу (25.08.2026) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив: особовий склад ❌ 1 450 танки 💥 7 бойові броньовані машини 💥 10 артилерійські системи 💥 74 РСЗВ 💥 4 засоби ППО 💥 1 НРК 💥 9 автотехніка та цистерни 💥 533 https://t.co/brr8OCMFJl

    359501114.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.5x their median

    За ВЕСЬ МИНУЛИЙ ТИЖДЕНЬ (24–30.08.26) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив (поруч ↗️ збільшення або ↘️ зменшення відносно попереднього тижня): ↗️ особовий склад ❌ 10 130 ↗️ танки 💥 23 ↘️ бойові броньовані машини 💥 44 ↘️ артсистеми 💥 364 ↗️ РСЗВ 💥 23 https://t.co/0tnPz7xZfb

    33355944.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.4x their median

    За ВСЮ ЛІТНЮ КАМПАНІЮ (01.06–31.08.26) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив (поруч ↗️ збільшення або ↘️ зменшення відносно 3 весняних місяців): ↗️ особовий склад ❌ 124 170 ↗️ танки 💥 354 ↗️ бойові бронемашини 💥 598 ↗️ артсистеми 💥 5 917 ↗️ РСЗВ 💥 259 https://t.co/8K7CApYC2a

    33050624.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.4x their median

    За минулу добу (24.08.2026) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив: особовий склад ❌ 1 230 бойові броньовані машини 💥 9 артилерійські системи 💥 48 РСЗВ 💥 2 засоби ППО 💥 1 НРК 💥 10 автотехніка та цистерни 💥 448 У понеділок кількість бойових зіткнень зменшилась. https://t.co/5oQ7c6l6wk

    323491113.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.3x their median

    За минулу добу (28.08.2026) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив:   особовий склад ❌ 1 420 танки 💥 3 бойові бронемашини 💥 4 артсистеми 💥 25 РСЗВ 💥 3 НРК 💥 9 автотехніка та цистерни 💥 318   У пʼятницю кількість бойових зіткнень була на рівні попереднього дня. https://t.co/Lh7GoWmBk0

    31252814.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.2x their median

    За минулу добу (01.09.2026) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив: особовий склад ❌ 1 390 танки 💥 4 бойові броньовані машини 💥 6 артилерійські системи 💥 62 РСЗВ 💥 2 засоби ППО 💥 1 НРК 💥 12 автотехніка та цистерни 💥 383 https://t.co/PjasrLWO6j

    30844833.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.1x their median

    За минулу добу (03.09.2026) противник на всіх напрямках орієнтовно втратив: особовий склад ❌ 1 440 танки 💥 1 бойові бронемашини 💥 8 артилерійські системи 💥 77 РСЗВ 💥 3 засоби ППО 💥 4 НРК 💥 13 автотехніка та цистерни 💥 492 У четвер кількість бойових зіткнень збільшилась. https://t.co/03eHyqufBD

    29542843.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 2.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 57% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 696 interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post.

What is НГУ's engagement rate on X?
НГУ (@ng_ukraine) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,174 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, НГУ sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ng_ukraine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ng_ukraine post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going