Back to @newsvop's profile

민중의소리 engagement report

@newsvop - 243K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 243K followers
Per impression
0.652%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 243K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.652% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.725% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 778 interactions, about 65x its own typical post.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

민중의소리's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, 민중의소리 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video1% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 1% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 67 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 202665x their median

    "미국 눈치를 보는 일본 총리도 트럼프 면전에서 파병을 거절했습니다." https://t.co/nFChJj6Ke6

    4353132198.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202660x their median

    “불법계엄을 선포하고 국회에 군을 보낸 윤석열의 탄핵은 방해하더니 이재명 대통령에게는 탄핵을 예고한다” https://t.co/sN7VjTp7uC

    452230191811K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202654x their median

    “한동훈, 정치검찰 악습 못 버리고 짜깁기로 국민 속여”@newsvop https://t.co/mCVDXISYkE

    41019526146.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202634x their median

    민주당 “유시민 억지주장으로 대통령 진의 왜곡말라”@newsvop https://t.co/EvO1Hw4lkX

    2586857259.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202634x their median

    이란 외교부, 한글 메시지 “한국, 침략에 가담 말라”@newsvop https://t.co/AQIYHhlYfb

    217186327.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202632x their median

    혁신당 신장식 “호르무즈 파병 반대...일본도 거절”@newsvop https://t.co/nFChJj6Ke6

    258125333.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202630x their median

    “비공개 자료가 적법한 절차 거치지 않고 공개됐다면 매우 엄중한 사안” https://t.co/WW6xsb16lT

    25287974.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202628x their median

    한동훈 향한 2개의 질문!! ①수사자료 누가 줬나? ②원본을 왜 짜깁기해서 공개했나? https://t.co/mCVDXISYkE

    2011121773.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202623x their median

    이 대통령 “선명함 드러내기 위한 과한 주장, 좋은 결과 만들기 어려워” https://t.co/i7WjTJQEfc

    16548382312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202616x their median

    이 대통령 “생각 차 가리지 않고 국민 삶에 환한 빛 고루 비추도록 뛰겠다" https://t.co/kMRm95qeT6

    14936432.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 243K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.652% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.725% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 778 interactions, about 65x its own typical post.

What is 민중의소리's engagement rate on X?
민중의소리 (@newsvop) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 243,383 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, 민중의소리 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @newsvop have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @newsvop post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going