Back to @newsvop's profile

민중의소리 engagement report

@newsvop - 244K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 244K followers
Per impression
0.694%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
10
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.694% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.591% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 778 interactions, about 78x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

민중의소리's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, 민중의소리 sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 66 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 202678x their median

    "미국 눈치를 보는 일본 총리도 트럼프 면전에서 파병을 거절했습니다." https://t.co/nFChJj6Ke6

    4353132198.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202665x their median

    “한동훈, 정치검찰 악습 못 버리고 짜깁기로 국민 속여”@newsvop https://t.co/mCVDXISYkE

    41019526146.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202641x their median

    이란 외교부, 한글 메시지 “한국, 침략에 가담 말라”@newsvop https://t.co/AQIYHhlYfb

    217186327.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202639x their median

    혁신당 신장식 “호르무즈 파병 반대...일본도 거절”@newsvop https://t.co/nFChJj6Ke6

    258125333.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202636x their median

    “비공개 자료가 적법한 절차 거치지 않고 공개됐다면 매우 엄중한 사안” https://t.co/WW6xsb16lT

    25287974.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202634x their median

    한동훈 향한 2개의 질문!! ①수사자료 누가 줬나? ②원본을 왜 짜깁기해서 공개했나? https://t.co/mCVDXISYkE

    2011121773.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20269.7x their median

    이란 전문가 “파병하면 페르시아만 한국 경제자산 파괴될 수도” 경고@newsvop https://t.co/WC7i87pkIz

    4346712.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20267.6x their median

    그럼에도 불구하고 일부 언론은 이러한 양씨의 과장된 발언을 그대로 옮겨 보도하면서 마치 김승원 후보자가 부당 청탁을 한 것처럼 몰아갔습니다. https://t.co/IN0VOWbnk5

    3735312.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20267.5x their median

    “밀실 추진과 여론 간보기가 웬 말이냐...전모 공개해야” https://t.co/dcguOW9ujV

    3928532.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.4x their median

    [사설] 퇴임하는 이흥구 대법관의 성찰@newsvop https://t.co/lqgzJJDuI0

    4427212.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.694% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.591% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 778 interactions, about 78x its own typical post.

What is 민중의소리's engagement rate on X?
민중의소리 (@newsvop) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 243,924 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, 민중의소리 sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @newsvop have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @newsvop post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going