Back to @newstart_2024's profile

Camus engagement report

@newstart_2024 - 464K followers on X

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 464K followers
Per impression
0.857%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
4.70%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
186
interactions (median)
Saved
0.322%
70 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.93/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 464K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.857% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 87% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Camus's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, Camus sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 783 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202621x their median

    Nobody wants to hear the truth about IQ because it is ugly. Jordan Peterson says the differences in how easily people learn and handle abstract work are huge, and they show up in paychecks and status. Conservatives like to say there is a job waiting if you just get after it. Liberals like to say anyone can be trained to do anything. Both skip the same reality: a lot of people struggle enough with complexity that finding a solid place in this economy has become brutally hard. He says we have no plan for that and we will not even look at it. Pretending the gap is not there does not shrink it.

    3.5K3139030778K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202615x their median

    Wim Hof says a breath hold after the exhale can send five times more blood to the brain and heart. On Diary of a CEO he tells Steven Bartlett that cardiologists caught it on heart films. Thirty hard breaths drop carbon dioxide, raise pH, and delay the urge to breathe. He argues modern life avoids the deep signals we were built for, cold and danger included. Leave those systems unused long enough and the body goes soft, immune system included. A breath hold lets CO2 rise again, which can widen brain vessels, trigger the dive reflex, and train tolerance to discomfort. Some work also links the broader method to shifts in stress hormones and immune signaling. Comfort trains the shallow layer. The older machinery only wakes under stress.

    2.3K3812617135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202613x their median

    Four cloves of garlic a day is her version of an antibiotic. Barbara O’Neill mixes a “flu bomb” when someone has a bad cold: crushed garlic, a bit of chopped ginger, lemon juice, honey, one drop of eucalyptus or tea tree oil, and as much cayenne as you can stand. It all goes into half a cup of hot water. She says the first sip feels like you just swallowed a bomb. Kids get a much smaller clove. Old kitchen remedies keep showing up because people still reach for them when they feel terrible.

    2.0K370275133K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20269.0x their median

    Vienna Demeduk was a healthy jogger. After receiving a Moderna COVID-19 vaccine on July 2, 2021, she suffered a stroke and hemorrhaged. She says doctors whispered. They told her she was "the seventh person this week" who was young, fit, and injured. One doctor allegedly told her privately she'd lose her license if she spoke about it. Her medical files from VGH were heavily redacted. She says the level of corruption she uncovered made her "live in a completely different reality." Patients' wellbeing and treatment must come before Big Pharma's bottom line, where they defend a product that clearly harmed people. Where is the compassion? Are these people not worth sympathy just because they were injured by an mRNA vaccine?

    1.1K515292531K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20269.0x their median

    Dana White went outside at 11:05 for his daughter. He has never done that for his sons. She is a freshman. Curfew is 11. His wife is out of town and blowing up the phone. He FaceTimes. She declines him. In that house, you do not decline Dad. So he walks out. The boy who was not supposed to be the ride still brings her home. White waits to see if a father calls. The kid survives the night. He even dates her after. He never comes in the house again. That is the split he will not apologize for. The sons can take their own punches. The daughter gets him on the driveway. Then the part that sneaks up on you. He is fine when they leave. His wife is not. The first child walks out and a certain energy leaves with them. The second feels off. By the third you already know the quiet. A lot of fathers call that a double standard. He calls it the job.

    1.6K63352445K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20268.6x their median

    RFK Jr. just made bombshell claims about childhood vaccines, and what he said will make you question everything At the Children's Health Defense conference, RFK Jr. didn't hold back. Here's what he claimed: The vaccine schedule exploded He says kids went from just 3 vaccines when he was growing up to a staggering 18 vaccines and 94 doses today. He claims this explosion started in the early 1990s, and nobody's asking why. The hepatitis B trial was tiny He claims the hepatitis B vaccine was licensed based on a trial of only 147 infants... monitored for just 5 days... with no placebo. For a shot given to millions of babies every year? He says that's not just inadequate - it's alarming. Only one vaccine was ever placebo-tested? Here's the one that shocked the room: He claims that out of all 94 doses and 18 vaccines, only the COVID vaccine was ever tested against a placebo. The rest? He says we have no real safety data. The insert lists diseases He pointed to vaccine package inserts listing adverse events like autoimmune disease, lupus, Guillain-Barré, seizures, diabetes, and even sudden infant death syndrome. He says across all 18 vaccines, there are 454 adverse events listed. 99% of injuries go unreported? He claims the vaccine injury reporting system is broken. Citing a 2010 CDC study, he says fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are ever reported — meaning over 99% vanish without a trace. The science that was never done He says the CDC gave the Institute of Medicine a list of 158 serious child injuries possibly linked to vaccines. He claims the IOM found no science at all for 123 of them, and called for urgent research. That was 2012. He says 13 years later, nothing has been done. Trump's order He says President Trump personally asked him to investigate whether childhood vaccines are fueling the chronic disease epidemic. The statements above are descriptions of claims made by RFK Jr. in his speech. They are not presented as established scientific fact. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources, peer-reviewed research, and their healthcare providers when evaluating vaccine-related information.

    1.2K340482058K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20268.3x their median

    mRNA COVID vaccine linked to lower risk of myocarditis in teens, young adults Being unvaccinated and getting COVID-19 were associated with a higher risk of heart disease and death than receiving a vaccine. Read more: https://t.co/GRa6B9TLa5 https://t.co/P8s4Iik8LP

    97536217045127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20266.1x their median

    Nixon’s problem with the elites was not their brains. He said they were living in Plato’s cave. In a 1992 C-SPAN conversation with Brian Lamb he calls the Georgetown dinner delightful and then names it intellectual incest. Inside the Beltway they talk to each other and think that conversation is the world. They do not climb out and look. Style blinds. Prejudice hardens. He will not pretend they are dull. He says they are often sharper than he is. Knowing what moves people is the part they miss. That is how, in his telling, they keep supporting losers. Plato’s prisoners watch shadows on a wall and call the wall the world. Nixon puts Washington in that room. The useful piece is still the same: a sealed capital can be brilliant and still be looking at its own hands.

    898186281662K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.5x their median

    RFK Jr. makes a striking case on vaccine injury surveillance: 1. Industry claims "20 years of use = safety," but we lack real surveillance systems. Connections hide in plain sight. 2. Leaded gasoline: Herbert Needleman's 1979 study showed lead-IQ link. He was ridiculed, attacked, investigated, career destroyed, until the 1996 ban raised American children's IQ by 2.5 points. The harm was real but unnoticed for 40 years. 3. DTP vaccine: Removed in the US in the '80s due to injuries (1 in 300 brain injury/death per NIH), yet still given to ~61M kids in Africa/Asia. Danish researchers found vaccinated girls were 10x more likely to die over the next 3 months - from infections, anemia, sepsis. Published in eBioPharma, Jan 2017. Conclusion: the vaccine was killing more children than the diseases it prevented. 4. Lesson: Mass catastrophic injuries can hide in plain sight. Nobody notices the connection without proper studies. 5. Trump wants these studies done, because "settled science" often can't produce the actual science to back it up. This is exactly why we must be constantly vigilant about pharmaceutical products, especially ones with no liability. When companies face zero accountability, the incentive to cut corners or ignore red flags is enormous. And when they cloak themselves in "the common good," we need to hold them to the highest standard: vaccines must be 1000% safe, not just "probably fine." We should demand that from our authorities, not trust vague reassurances. Vigilance isn't anti-science; it's what real science demands.

    741252201422K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.4x their median

    Before CPR, people tried to revive drowning victims by blowing tobacco smoke into their anuses. It sounds like a joke, but in 18th-century Europe, the tobacco smoke enema was treated as a serious medical intervention. When someone was pulled unconscious from the Thames, rescuers were encouraged to warm and rub the body, stimulate the nose with smelling salts, provide artificial respiration, and, in some cases, insert a pipe into the rectum and pump tobacco smoke into the intestines. The reasoning seemed plausible at the time: tobacco was believed to stimulate the body, restore warmth, and “awaken” someone who appeared to be dead. In London, the practice became so accepted that public rescue kits were placed along the River Thames during the late 1700s. These kits reportedly contained equipment such as bellows, pipes, tobacco, and instructions for attempting resuscitation. The procedure was promoted by organizations including the Society for the Recovery of Persons Apparently Drowned, founded in 1774 and later renamed the Royal Humane Society. But there was one major problem: There was no reliable evidence that it worked. Worse, nicotine can be absorbed through the rectal lining. Instead of reviving a drowning victim, the treatment could cause nicotine poisoning, severe cardiovascular effects, seizures, or death. By the early 19th century, experiments increasingly exposed tobacco’s dangerous effects on the heart, and the practice gradually disappeared as medical understanding improved. The strange history of the tobacco smoke enema reveals something important about medicine: Treatments do not become safe or effective simply because respected physicians recommend them. They need evidence. And sometimes, the line between “medical innovation” and “terrible idea” only becomes obvious in hindsight. So yes, the phrase “blowing smoke up someone’s…” has a remarkably literal historical connection.

    470103422639K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 464K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.857% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 87% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is Camus's engagement rate on X?
Camus (@newstart_2024) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 464,221 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, Camus sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @newstart_2024 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @newstart_2024 post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going