Back to @neenz_xxx's profile

NEENA engagement report

@neenz_xxx - 261K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.01%
of 261K followers
Per impression
0.347%
7.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.92%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.347% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 1619x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, NEENA sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,281 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 70 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 20251619x their median

    What a poor miserable existence in a glass prison for over 20 years https://t.co/xC9qg3zDHX

    35K4.0K1.9K7645.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 2026

    Conor McGregor spoke about his return fight on the Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon "I'm born for this I'm not born for anything else. Fighting is my bread and butter, it's what lights a fire in my belly. It's the best version of me, I'm happy to be back." https://t.co/SenAlJqQvT

    15K4991.3K1.3K23M viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026387x their median

    Explain to me why I’m supposed to feel sorry for @PerezHilton again? https://t.co/uoXYqgl64e

    9.4K57301148.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 2023311x their median

    Happy National Ice Cream Day šŸ¦šŸ’ @jimbodragclown #AllStars8 https://t.co/1xQ0nGx4pY

    4.5K2581.8K1.5K16M viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2026255x their median

    The Trump administration just made it legal to kill 400,000 wild animals a year in secret. No public notice. No comment period. Just done. The USDA finalized rules this April gutting decades of public participation requirements on 193 million acres of national forest. Logging, drilling, mining, road building — all can now be approved before the public ever hears about it. That includes Wildlife Services — the federal program that kills more than 400,000 native animals every year. Coyotes. Bears. Wolves. Beavers. Mountain lions. Killed on behalf of ranching interests, with your tax dollars, on your public land. Now completely out of public view. 150,000 public comments opposing these rules were thrown out. Attorneys general from 17 states objected. Tribal governments objected. The administration didn't care. "Information is power. Our voices are power. And the Trump administration is trying to strip both away so corporations can make a quick buck off our public lands." — Wendy Park, Center for Biological Diversity. Who gave the government permission to kill 400,000 wild animals a year and hide it from the rest of us? #DemsUnited

    3.1K2.9K347277261K viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 2026

    Circus bear suddenly attacks its handler mid-act. Pure chaos. 😳 https://t.co/MdCuJwUY0V

    56731681241.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 20262.4x their median

    Send this to your best friend šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚ https://t.co/Oztk6hevPV

    4131624.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026

    Where in the world are you from? šŸŒ

    190807.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 2026

    Good morning cutiessss šŸ¤šŸ¤šŸ¤

    230307.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 2026

    Hey everyone, I’m now on subs! Follow me for FREE to see my exclusive content šŸ”„ Click to join instantly with your X account. See you there šŸ‘€ https://t.co/kr0SFyX30K

    140007.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.347% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 1619x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is NEENA's engagement rate on X?
NEENA (@neenz_xxx) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 261,476 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, NEENA sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,281 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @neenz_xxx have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @neenz_xxx post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going