Back to @nauracrypto's profile

NAURA engagement report

@nauracrypto - 419K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.069%
of 419K followers
Per impression
0.136%
213K views on a typical post
Reach
50.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
289
interactions (median)
Saved
0.001%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 289 interactions against 419K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 213K times each, and 0.136% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 50.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 80% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 333 interactions.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NAURA's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.069%, NAURA sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link80% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 80% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 745 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026

    Before you apply to one more job — is your resume ATS-friendly? Free this month: a rubric-based scan against common best practices, with fixes you can actually use. Get your code 👉 https://t.co/WI2C9mxcoO via @PButterJelly. #resume #Solana #Crypto #ad https://t.co/UHMO6LZiWz

    24543450206K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Real-world utility is becoming an increasingly important narrative in crypto, particularly when it comes to payments and cross-border transactions. That’s what stood out to me about ZakPay and the broader Zakat Coin ecosystem. They’ve built Visa-style payment infrastructure using blockchain for cross-border settlement, while funds remain in custodial accounts until settlement. So rather than simply moving customer funds on-chain, blockchain is being used as part of the underlying orchestration and settlement infrastructure. The $ZKTC mechanics are where things get even more interesting. For settled transactions, $ZKTC is burned to the 0xdead address, permanently removing the tokens from circulation. There’s also ODS — On-Demand Supply — which is designed to tie token supply availability to actual economic activity across the ecosystem rather than relying solely on a predetermined release schedule. And giving is integrated into the model as well. ZakPay is designed so everyday payment activity can generate charitable contributions. As users send, spend and move money through the ecosystem, a portion can simultaneously support charitable giving. The combination is interesting: Real payments → Settlement → $ZKTC utility Transaction activity → Charitable giving Economic activity → ODS supply mechanics That’s a different approach from launching a token first and figuring out the utility afterward. $ZKTC is already live on Coinstore, while ZakPay’s broader commercial rollout is still ahead. The key thing I’ll be watching is whether real adoption translates into meaningful transaction volume, charitable impact and sustained $ZKTC utility. Join the ZakPay waitlist: https://t.co/Nw8lev5SzJ ZakPay: https://t.co/04rzPtNcPv Zakat Coin: https://t.co/slomGMzs8t Telegram: https://t.co/BQayYhHrmc ZKTC/USDT on Coinstore: https://t.co/DzHyRbO7nO $ZKTC #ZakatCoin #ZakPay #RWA #Crypto #Payments #CrossBorderPayments #Fintech #Web3

    23842500259K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    I’ve come across a lot of memecoins lately, but $DIESEL has a simple identity that’s easy to recognize. The project is centered around Diesel the Dog and is putting its focus on creative content, community, and consistent branding. The videos, music, and visuals all contribute to building a narrative around the character rather than relying on a complicated pitch. It’s still early, and there’s plenty of room for the community to shape what comes next. I’ll be keeping an eye on how $DIESEL develops from here. CA: 4gbqirCDG4pJXPMgZMJJNj2u73G9puZwkK3pbPgTpump https://t.co/W93mwEJY0f https://t.co/rt5z7dYjb4 https://t.co/SQT4SXNk07

    23643480238K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    There’s something interesting about a meme coin that starts with an actual story rather than just a ticker. $ONELOVE is the community coin of One Love Sailing, built on Solana and connected to a real sailing business and its captain. The project isn’t making the usual promises about guaranteed pumps or quick profits. Instead, the idea is to grow patiently with the community and see whether a meme coin can develop around a genuine identity and real-world connection. It’s a very new experiment, which makes the community response especially interesting to watch. CA: F1r5AqRj8bJyzM4nUZpVBH1JQT8ToR4Rvjj2YwxHmoon Also tradable through Coinbase DEX https://t.co/IcY9mCgLas https://t.co/NJAfmfqN4F Real Captain. Real business. Real community. Always verify the CA and DYOR.

    23244450243K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    $DEOD Finally Breaks Out After 25 Days of Consolidation $DEOD was consolidating for almost 25 days, and now it has successfully broken out of the chart pattern with strong momentum. Here is my $DEOD buy call Buy: $0.0181 Target: $0.050 on Poloniex listing day The Poloniex listing is only days away, and I’m positioning before the listing hype begins. You can trade $DEOD on MEXC, Toobit, BingX & PancakeSwap. Let’s see how high $DEOD can go on listing day.

    18467510223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Not every meme needs a complicated storyline. Sometimes the strongest angle is simply having a concept people can instantly recognize. That’s what I like about Kinda solana:HWzUC1x4WAyHjvKM9XtAxmd9PwNwjySgt4PXDN7opump. The identity is straightforward, the branding is memorable, and it gives the community plenty of room to create around the narrative without forcing unnecessary utility. With 112M+ solana:HWzUC1x4WAyHjvKM9XtAxmd9PwNwjySgt4PXDN7opump already burned, there’s also a supply-reduction element that adds another interesting layer to the project. It’s still early, so the community will ultimately decide whether the Kinda Chic identity can turn into something bigger. I’ll be watching how this one develops. CA: DFx9Zg1tgjBP9siauXi8QPxSX4QKxeNf7wkh4RFWpump Chart: https://t.co/xg9VglRmin X: https://t.co/yhlnxb87sX

    20147492240K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    DeFi becomes much more interesting when the economics are designed to interact with each other, and that’s the angle I find interesting about $YFSX and $VIN. YFSX acts as the governance and deflationary side of the ecosystem, while VIN is focused on utility and circulation. Their mechanics are connected through transaction activity, liquidity and token burns. The stated fee structure is 3% on YFSX transactions and 2% on VIN, with fees directed into liquidity pools and supporting LP dividends. The ecosystem also connects with BNB, ETH, XRP, LTC, UNI, CAKE, LINK and DOGE. The bigger idea is to create a system where usage itself contributes to the ecosystem rather than relying solely on outside capital. The project states that it has been operating for over four years and has undergone CertiK audits. Definitely a model worth understanding before forming an opinion. If you want to understand the model better or get involved, check out the Alpha YV Builders group, where you’ll also find information about community events and activities: https://t.co/FAMQWcyR6G YFSX: 0xb7ec60cf8ef96ed48b119277bc7a954a87f27388 VIN: 0x85e43bf8faaf04ceddcd03d6c07438b72606a988 Updates: https://t.co/Vfdlsx9TJQ https://t.co/EeeTVqrBcv https://t.co/CHYKiw2QJH

    1845952025K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    🚨 HUMABIRD BUY CHALLENGE IS LIVE! 🐦👁️ The flock is getting ready for the next flight, and the Shadow of the Huma Bird is rewarding those who step up. 🎁 BUY 500K $HUMABIRD → GET 50K $HUMABIRD BONUS Want in? 1️⃣ Like & RT the challenge post 2️⃣ Buy 500K $HUMABIRD on https://t.co/x8fuZnUDoh 3️⃣ Comment your Solana wallet + screenshot or TX link 👇 Every new holder adds another bird to the flock. Let’s see how far $HUMABIRD can fly. 🐦⚡️ CA: GkJiayT8ej2owKuTRJHmeHZabELsk8UZvYy41Pwgpump Buy: https://t.co/FvGoyLkkiF $SOL #Humabird #SolanaGems #Pumpfun #MemeCoin #Solana

    18554530178K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    A new IEO is coming for Global 全球币. The first round is scheduled for September 8, 2026 at 11:58 PM Beijing time through GW Wallet, with an IEO price of 0.1 USDT versus the stated latest market price of 0.958 USDT. Token: Global 全球币 CA: 0xf7813c5b7557b001a62883f54240a1db6ffeaeed IEO participants should note the 360-day lock-up, followed by a 1% monthly release. Access is also restricted to GW Wallet users. If you need GW Wallet, download it from the official website: https://t.co/GshIiLp0es For Apple devices, you may need to go to Settings → General → VPN & Device Management → Trust after installation. More details can be checked on DEX Screener. Global 全球币 | First IEO | 0.1 USDT Verify the official information and DYOR before participating.

    18753510225K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    BotCoin $BOTZ | @BotCoinBOTZ $BOTZ is making meme culture more interactive, with a community that’s focused on more than just the initial hype. The 50M $BOTZ staking rewards pool is now live, alongside 1M+ $BOTZ in weekly community rewards, daily giveaways & creative contests. The vision is simple: make it fun, reward participation, and grow together for the long term. Stake. Earn. Participate. Grow With $BOTZ. Website: https://t.co/ERxHvY07ZQ CA: 8hbHUyJhEKE6SK595ZNKAnNkoJ45gwkR2qskooupump

    17858510194K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 289 interactions against 419K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 213K times each, and 0.136% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 50.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 80% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 333 interactions.

What is NAURA's engagement rate on X?
NAURA (@nauracrypto) has an engagement rate of 0.069%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 419,279 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.069%, NAURA sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @nauracrypto have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @nauracrypto post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going