namynotinc engagement report
@namynotinc - 47K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 103 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.218% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions. Recurring topics include #businesscredit, #net30.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #businesscredit, #net30.
Compared with accounts its own size
namynotinc's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, namynotinc sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 109 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Feb 23, 2026
This ad was made entirely with AI. https://t.co/VcxdSGnFQ6
- Mar 2, 2026
A Google patent describes the process of Google building custom AI-generated landing pages for when people click on search results, instead of going to your website https://t.co/Ak3ULvUdnv hat tip @glenngabe @NarwhalJosh @BrandonLazovic https://t.co/Sat8LsQqjD
- Jan 24, 2026
Your Price Tag Determines Your Patience. Stop Expecting Quick Sales. The more expensive your offer, the more touchpoints you need, stop selling and start building a 23+ touch journey for high-ticket clients. The sooner you realize modern buyers need to know you across webinars, email, and Instagram before they trust you, the faster you’ll stop losing long-term deals. The bottom line? If you’re selling something over $10,000 and you’re not systematically engaging leads 20+ times, you’re not building the trust required to close. #CustomerJourney #B2BSales #MarketingFunnel #TouchpointStrategy
- Mar 3, 2026
Your images should move as fast as your code. Bolt can generate images now. Describe it → you're done. Transparent background built in. Optimized format out of the box. One less tab. One less export. https://t.co/Q57dnr9sCu
- Feb 23, 2026
Today, 82% of consumers use social media to research products. And while Google still holds 34% of the search market share, attention isn’t centralized; it’s scattered. What works on LinkedIn won’t necessarily land on Instagram, and what performs on TikTok won’t translate to X. Each network plays by its own rules. That’s why benchmarking by platform isn’t optional 👀 Plan across channels, track KPIs with clarity, and monitor competitor moves with Semrush Social Media Toolkit: https://t.co/LQYhCrqrzP.
- Feb 20, 2026
Studies show that user-generated content websites like Quora, Reddit, and YouTube get an overwhelming amount of visibility on Google’s AI Overviews👇 By building your brand on those platforms, you could find a shortcut to getting seen in more AI Overviews 🫣 https://t.co/Di3M64opdr.
- Mar 2, 2026
While SEOs spent much of 2025 worrying that AI Overviews (AIOs) would siphon off even more organic traffic, Google was figuring out how to balance improving the AI search experience with their need to maintain an ad revenue model. Near the end of the year, we noticed Google increasing this combination of AIOs and ads on search engine results pages (SERPs). By October 2025, Google Ads appeared on 25.56% of search results that included AI Overviews – up from just 5.17% in March. That's a 394% increase in eight months. We discovered this when updating our AI Overview study that tracked over 10 million keywords during 2025. The data reveals an intentional adjustment from Google to redesign how advertisers can reach customers in AI-driven search ➜ https://t.co/UiedM0gazg.
- Jun 15, 2026
Marketing history is full of expensive “we’ll do it later" moments. Don't let your brand become invisible in the AI search era. Save your slot at the Semrush Villa and get a clear view of how your brand shows up across modern search 👉 https://t.co/fwKojbm3Tj https://t.co/gwP1uZRJUc
- Feb 20, 2026
AI search could surpass traditional search by 2028. ChatGPT cites pages in position 20+ nearly 90% of the time. The future of #SEO isn't rankings. It's #visibility everywhere. Here's what that actually means 👇 https://t.co/ZoWC7hwa7S https://t.co/csQizSeIRJ
- Feb 28, 2026
Wow! AI agents & automation save us 41 hours a week 🤯 That's an entire work shift... Imagine if you could save 40+ hours of repetitive & mundane work and shift that effort into business growth & fun projects 😎 Want to save 40 hours a week? Ask how! https://t.co/i2MJThS1o5
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 103 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.218% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions. Recurring topics include #businesscredit, #net30.
- What is namynotinc's engagement rate on X?
- namynotinc (@namynotinc) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 47,342 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, namynotinc sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @namynotinc have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @namynotinc post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.