Back to @namynotinc's profile

namynotinc engagement report

@namynotinc - 47K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 47K followers
Per impression
0%
103 views on a typical post
Reach
0.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 103 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.218% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions. Recurring topics include #businesscredit, #net30.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #businesscredit, #net30.

Compared with accounts its own size

namynotinc's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, namynotinc sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 109 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 23, 2026

    This ad was made entirely with AI. https://t.co/VcxdSGnFQ6

    1.3K102821390K viewsView on X
  • Mar 2, 2026

    A Google patent describes the process of Google building custom AI-generated landing pages for when people click on search results, instead of going to your website https://t.co/Ak3ULvUdnv hat tip @glenngabe @NarwhalJosh @BrandonLazovic https://t.co/Sat8LsQqjD

    21843132344K viewsView on X
  • Jan 24, 2026

    Your Price Tag Determines Your Patience. Stop Expecting Quick Sales. The more expensive your offer, the more touchpoints you need, stop selling and start building a 23+ touch journey for high-ticket clients. The sooner you realize modern buyers need to know you across webinars, email, and Instagram before they trust you, the faster you’ll stop losing long-term deals. The bottom line? If you’re selling something over $10,000 and you’re not systematically engaging leads 20+ times, you’re not building the trust required to close. #CustomerJourney #B2BSales #MarketingFunnel #TouchpointStrategy

    71101934.7K viewsView on X
  • Mar 3, 2026

    Your images should move as fast as your code. Bolt can generate images now. Describe it → you're done. Transparent background built in. Optimized format out of the box. One less tab. One less export. https://t.co/Q57dnr9sCu

    631014911K viewsView on X
  • Feb 23, 2026

    Today, 82% of consumers use social media to research products. And while Google still holds 34% of the search market share, attention isn’t centralized; it’s scattered. What works on LinkedIn won’t necessarily land on Instagram, and what performs on TikTok won’t translate to X. Each network plays by its own rules. That’s why benchmarking by platform isn’t optional 👀 Plan across channels, track KPIs with clarity, and monitor competitor moves with Semrush Social Media Toolkit: https://t.co/LQYhCrqrzP.

    6720413.0K viewsView on X
  • Feb 20, 2026

    Studies show that user-generated content websites like Quora, Reddit, and YouTube get an overwhelming amount of visibility on Google’s AI Overviews👇 By building your brand on those platforms, you could find a shortcut to getting seen in more AI Overviews 🫣 https://t.co/Di3M64opdr.

    5611544.2K viewsView on X
  • Mar 2, 2026

    While SEOs spent much of 2025 worrying that AI Overviews (AIOs) would siphon off even more organic traffic, Google was figuring out how to balance improving the AI search experience with their need to maintain an ad revenue model. Near the end of the year, we noticed Google increasing this combination of AIOs and ads on search engine results pages (SERPs). By October 2025, Google Ads appeared on 25.56% of search results that included AI Overviews – up from just 5.17% in March. That's a 394% increase in eight months. We discovered this when updating our AI Overview study that tracked over 10 million keywords during 2025. The data reveals an intentional adjustment from Google to redesign how advertisers can reach customers in AI-driven search ➜ https://t.co/UiedM0gazg.

    596525.3K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 2026

    Marketing history is full of expensive “we’ll do it later" moments. Don't let your brand become invisible in the AI search era.
 Save your slot at the Semrush Villa and get a clear view of how your brand shows up across modern search 👉 https://t.co/fwKojbm3Tj https://t.co/gwP1uZRJUc

    275521.2K viewsView on X
  • Feb 20, 2026

    AI search could surpass traditional search by 2028. ChatGPT cites pages in position 20+ nearly 90% of the time. The future of #SEO isn't rankings. It's #visibility everywhere. Here's what that actually means 👇 https://t.co/ZoWC7hwa7S https://t.co/csQizSeIRJ

    134321.5K viewsView on X
  • Feb 28, 2026

    Wow! AI agents & automation save us 41 hours a week 🤯 That's an entire work shift... Imagine if you could save 40+ hours of repetitive & mundane work and shift that effort into business growth & fun projects 😎 Want to save 40 hours a week? Ask how! https://t.co/i2MJThS1o5

    201093 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#businesscredit#net30

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 103 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.218% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions. Recurring topics include #businesscredit, #net30.

What is namynotinc's engagement rate on X?
namynotinc (@namynotinc) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 47,342 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, namynotinc sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @namynotinc have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @namynotinc post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going