PlayerSells
Back to @namiiswan01's profile

Nami πŸ’˜ engagement report

@namiiswan01 - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.31%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
5.26%
86K views on a typical post
Reach
5.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
1.08%
924 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.23/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 4.5K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.31%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 5.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 192K interactions, about 43x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Nami πŸ’˜'s engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.31%, Nami πŸ’˜ sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.046% to 0.318%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video81% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length-+7%+4% to +10%7.0K
  • 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 46 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 7% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 28, 202643x their median

    η₯ˆγ‚Šγ‚’γ€η†Šζœ¬γΈγ€‚πŸ€πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ https://t.co/KsvbfAzAmB

    166K24K4153883.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202626x their median

    Would you do it? https://t.co/5UJjfT8X9L

    113K3.6K842661.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202613x their median

    It got bigger ? https://t.co/bTjxb1Flb6

    57K1.9K299181.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202611x their median

    Did you notice? https://t.co/KnRy5IDYcb

    49K1.6K33822497K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202610x their median

    πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ https://t.co/nRc4Bqz14J

    44K1.3K14916991K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.0x their median

    Ready whenever you are https://t.co/2aAld75hyp

    8.4K517481107K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.9x their median

    Thiccu Miku https://t.co/hzjqzsC4Ok

    8.0K55428390K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.7x their median

    Roadtrip to silent hill? https://t.co/J16lC286cW

    7.5K378273106K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20261.6x their median

    Serving you looks and bad decisions, pick your favorite😍 https://t.co/oDZatURfyv

    6.1K1.1K460120K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20261.5x their median

    on or off?? https://t.co/EzLAkMwh4a

    5.6K1.2K2102370K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.5K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.31%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 86K times each, and 5.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 192K interactions, about 43x its own typical post.

What is Nami πŸ’˜'s engagement rate on X?
Nami πŸ’˜ (@namiiswan01) has an engagement rate of 0.31%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,450,907 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.31%, Nami πŸ’˜ sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @namiiswan01 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @namiiswan01 post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going