Back to @najnoja's profile

Najoola ⓯ ㊱ engagement report

@najnoja - 58K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 58K followers
Per impression
0.216%
696 views on a typical post
Reach
1.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 58K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 696 times each, and 0.216% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 320 interactions, about 160x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Najoola ⓯ ㊱'s engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Najoola ⓯ ㊱ sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 12, 2020160x their median

    سألوا الإمام علي عليه السلام هل هناك شي اعظم من الموت ؟ قال : نعم ،، فراق الأحبة صعب جدا ان اللي كنت تدعي لها بالصحة والعافية بلحظة تقول الله يرحمها ،، ٣ ايام وماني قادرة استوعب انج مو معاي يا حبيبتي رحتي عند اللي ارحم مني عليج الله يرحمج يا يمة الله يحشرج مع محمد وال محمد

    180161222View on X
  • Sep 20, 202621x their median

    حتى البلنتي حسب مزاج الحكم https://t.co/oVqYvvzUt5

    334506.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202619x their median

    حالتا عرقلة لـ "آخر مدافع": احتُسبت إحداهما ركلة جزاء مع إشهار بطاقة حمراء، بينما أفلتت الأخرى دون أي عقوبة. يكمن الفارق في مبلغ 8.5 مليون يورو دُفع لنائب رئيس لجنة الحكام على مدار 17 عاماً. https://t.co/SPpZken2jg

    267403.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20268.5x their median

    RMTV: "أنهى ريال مدريد المباراة بـ 10 لاعبين، بينما أنهاها أتلتيكو بـ 11 لاعباً." "يمكننا القول صراحةً إنه دوري فاسد؛ هناك تلاعب بالنتائج، والحكم لا يعرف معنى النزاهة وهو جبان." https://t.co/AWlxK5w4z7

    11510912 viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20268.5x their median

    روميرو يدهس ركبة جود بمسامير حذائه ويكتفي الحكم بإشهار البطاقة الصفراء فقط 😂😂 ليغا فاسدة وحكام فاسدين https://t.co/NypFt2rtJg

    134001.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20267.0x their median

    تخيل ما اخذ انذار !!! https://t.co/pCMcnVEWhG

    112101.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20266.5x their median

    لم يُشهر في وجهه أي بطاقة صفراء. ولم يتلقَّ أي تحذير من تقنية حكم الفيديو المساعد (VAR). هذه البطولة عار وملطخة بالفساد. https://t.co/nQyO1NRjKw

    111011.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20266.0x their median

    RMTV: "هناك العديد من الشخصيات التي قررت أن ريال مدريد لا يمكنه المنافسة في هذه البطولة؛ إنها مسابقة فاسدة. لا تريد الرابطة أن يفوز ريال مدريد بالمباريات؛ كل شيء فاسد." https://t.co/wF1ITFAOcx

    9210947 viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.0x their median

    من أصل 104 مباريات أقيمت هذا العام في كأس العالم، أدار حكم إسباني مباراة واحدة فقط. كان هيرنانديز هيرنانديز هو الحكم في مباراة دور المجموعات التي جمعت بين البرازيل وهايتي. مباراة واحدة فقط؛لا مباريات في الأدوار الإقصائية، ولا شيء آخر. وهذا يختصر كل شيء عن مستوى الحكام الاسبان

    64001.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.0x their median

    لم يكتفِ بذلك فبعد هذه الفضيحة التي جرت على مرأى من العالم بأسره، احتسب الحكم أورتيز أرياس ركلة جزاء ولجأ إلى (VAR) ليشهر البطاقة الحمراء في وجه هاوسن. النتيجة 1-0 ونقص عددي في صفوف الفريق، في حين كان من المفترض أن يكمل أتلتيكو المباراة بتسعة لاعبين 🤣🤣 https://t.co/fAr4bb9Wqf

    60002.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 58K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 696 times each, and 0.216% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 320 interactions, about 160x its own typical post.

What is Najoola ⓯ ㊱'s engagement rate on X?
Najoola ⓯ ㊱ (@najnoja) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 58,060 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Najoola ⓯ ㊱ sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @najnoja have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @najnoja post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going