Deborah engagement report
@n__deborah - 304K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 279 interactions against 304K followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 111K times each, and 0.252% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 24% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 986 interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dreamina, #dreaminapartner, #traces.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #dreamina, #dreaminapartner, #traces.
Compared with accounts its own size
Deborah's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.092%, Deborah sits above the 25th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.5% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 116.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 71% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 47% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 47% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 559 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 26, 20263.5x their median
Today we're releasing Isaac 0.5: 36B dynamic MoE, open weight 🤗 embodied foundation model. Isaac combines multimodal video understanding, embodied reasoning and robot control into a single, sparse backbone. https://t.co/AqdVpfhESm
- Sep 2, 20262.0x their median
Privacy in AI wearables starts before data reaches the cloud. It starts with whether the people around you know the device is there. With Vocci, transparency is built in from the beginning—not added later as a disclaimer. Watch our CEO JY shares how we think about privacy by design.
- Sep 3, 2026
A financial agent should not get a pass only because its answer sounds polished. What it found, what it checked, and what it missed can matter just as much as the final wording. FinFIRST makes that evaluation question more concrete in practice. Here is why 👇 https://t.co/rTBa5ZBJy2
- Aug 25, 2026
14 outdated references caught before publication last month. Zero corrections shipped. In our category a tutorial can go stale in a week, and readers notice before we do. I lead a digital marketing team, and a lot of what we publish documents tools that change constantly. Product launches, platform updates, UI changes that quietly break a step someone follows. Our first fix was a monthly audit sweep. It caught the big releases and missed the small changes, which are exactly the ones people write about. So we gave Viktor the accuracy job. He tracks what changed in the tools we've written about, flags which published pieces are now wrong, and turns that into a queue our editor works from. Our editor stopped guessing what needed updating. Our researcher moved from hunting for information to checking what he surfaced. Our ops lead reprioritizes the calendar off his daily brief when something breaks. Nothing gets republished without a person signing off. Same four people, and roughly 10 hours a week back that used to go into checking our own archive. Half the tutorials ranking in our category right now are wrong, and the teams that published them have no way of knowing which half. Seats are for tools. Employees are priced on output. Hire @viktor_com for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #ContentOps Paid Partnership
- Aug 24, 2026
CapCut just made AI video creation even more accessible. Seedance 2.0 Fast is now available for as low as $0.01 per second, giving creators an easy-to-use workflow, powerful AI models, and seriously affordable generation all in one place. Web: https://t.co/0R3YZVWjo6 App: https://t.co/xD3Y3O3r4s #CapCut #Seedance25 #CapCutai #CapCutDidThat
- Aug 25, 2026
🚨 One 30-second clip. Two price tags: $0.78 or $3.21. Which one are you choosing? Seedance 2.5 gets the headlines. Seedance 2.0 gets my work done. Both 2.0 & 2.0 Fast, only on Dreamina: a 30-second clip costs $0.78 — vs $3.21 elsewhere. 76% less. #Dreamina #DreaminaPartner https://t.co/NXOEMsa4DV
- Aug 25, 2026
You don't need to worry about servers, databases, or auth systems to start building your idea. SuperComputer brings the AI models and infrastructure together in one place. Let me explain ↓
- Sep 3, 2026
The hardest part of content isn't creating it. It's getting approved work across the finish line. I work with a small content team publishing AI, marketing, and technology content every week, and we kept running into the same problem. A piece would be finished, but it still needed channel versions, assets, approvals, scheduling, and calendar updates before it could actually go live. Content wasn't stuck because it wasn't written. It was stuck because nobody owned everything after "approved." So I brought Viktor into Slack to own our publishing operations. My first attempt wasn't great. I gave him a broad brief around our content calendar, but the output still needed too much cleanup. I hadn't actually defined what I wanted him to own. So I narrowed it down: take approved content, check what's missing, prepare what each channel needs, and get it into the publishing queue. It didn't stay that simple. Our editor started relying on him to keep the queue moving. Our social lead delegated platform formatting and scheduling. Our ops lead handed him deadline tracking, missing approvals, and routine follow-ups. The team stopped spending its time figuring out what needed to happen next. Viktor kept the workflow moving while humans handled the creative and editorial decisions. I'd rather have an AI employee own the publishing grind while the team focuses on making the content worth publishing. Most AI helps create content. Viktor makes sure it gets published. Hire @viktor_com for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #ContentOps #MarketingOps Paid Partnership
- Aug 24, 2026
🚨 One 30-second clip. Two price tags: $0.78 or $3.21. Which one are you choosing? Seedance 2.5 gets the headlines. Seedance 2.0 gets my work done. Both 2.0 & 2.0 Fast, only on Dreamina: a 30-second clip costs $0.78 — vs $3.21 elsewhere. 76% less. #Dreamina #DreaminaPartner https://t.co/Dp1r7XcouG
- Aug 26, 2026
Can we talk about how most AI avatars still look weird?? The lips are always slightly off, the expressions feel stiff, and it just takes you right out of it. I tried @WizstarAI AI Avatar Turbo this week after it hit #1 Product of the Day on Product Hunt, and I genuinely didn’t expect to be this impressed. One photo is all it takes to create a talking avatar. The lip sync stays accurate even with different camera angles, or when something is covering part of the face. And the facial expressions actually feel much more natural. The tech behind it is pretty interesting too. Wizstar uses a two-stage approach that separates speech, mouth movement, and head pose before reconstructing the facial details. It seems to be a big part of why the final result feels less stiff. And you only have to create the avatar once. Then reuse it for social content, presentations, training videos, product demos, and more. You can even create a digital twin with your own appearance and voice. Free credits when you sign up 👉 https://t.co/rrA8hQcL8I @WizstarAI #Wizstar #AIAvatar #AIVideo #ContentCreation
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 279 interactions against 304K followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 111K times each, and 0.252% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 24% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 986 interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dreamina, #dreaminapartner, #traces.
- What is Deborah's engagement rate on X?
- Deborah (@n__deborah) has an engagement rate of 0.092%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 303,686 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.092%, Deborah sits above the 25th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @n__deborah have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @n__deborah post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.