Back to @mustafasuleyman's profile

Mustafa Suleyman engagement report

@mustafasuleyman - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.045%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.098%
543K views on a typical post
Reach
46.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
531
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
90 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 531 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Posts are seen about 543K times each, and 0.098% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 46.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video, 40% are part of a thread and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 111x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, Mustafa Suleyman sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link60% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 60% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 182 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 14, 2026111x their median

    https://t.co/vLmiBKTtX3

    42K8.2K2.9K4.6K71M viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 202614x their median

    Such a privilege to work with Microsoft to bring claws to enterprises!

    4.7K30913335479K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20267.3x their median

    Super excited to announce seven new world-class MAI models today. They represent what we consider a new era in AI designed to keep you in control and on the frontier. First is our text foundation model, MAI-Thinking-1, exceptionally strong on reasoning and SWE tasks. - It’s a 35B active parameter MoE with a 256K context window. Independent human raters on Surge prefer it for overall quality in blind side-by-sides versus Sonnet 4.6, and it’s achieved 97% on AIME 2025, the key measure of its general-purpose reasoning abilities. - It's at 53% on SWE Bench Pro, placing it right alongside Opus 4.6 on one of the toughest coding benchmarks. - And since we co-designed our models with our own silicon, MAI-Thinking-1 is optimized on our MAIA 200 chip. Benchmarking head-to-head against the GB200, we see 30% better performance per dollar as well as a 1.4x performance-per-watt gain when running our MAI models on the MAIA 200 end-to-end. Next is MAI-Image-2.5 and its Flash variant. Two super strong models now at #2 on the leaderboards, surpassing the score of Nano Banana 2 on image editing. Last for now is MAI-Code-1-Flash, our new inference efficient coding model, especially tuned for VS Code and GitHub Copilot CLI. - Code-1-Flash achieves 51% on SWE Bench Pro, despite having just 5B parameters, putting it closer to Haiku in size but cheaper in cost. All of this is the foundation for Microsoft Frontier Tuning. It lets you customize our models to create custom, company-specific agents that only you control. You can make our model, your model. Your data. Your agents. Your moat. Early adopters are already seeing a difference. When we tuned our models for McKinsey’s tasks, MAI delivered the highest win rate, outperforming GPT-5.5 on quality, while being 10x lower on cost. Also really excited to be collaborating with the amazing team at Mayo Clinic to jointly train a new frontier AI model for healthcare. Our announcements today mark another milestone on the road to humanist superintelligence. You can learn more and about our other new models in our latest blog: https://t.co/v65eop5Ixq

    3.8K5231932211.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20267.8x their median

    We now have state-of-the-art pre-trained base models in the 3T-parameter weight class, built entirely in-house at MAI. Post-training results coming soon -- stay tuned! Lots of details in our technical blog post. https://t.co/xcZ5uV4TAp

    3.5K3561481611.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20265.6x their median

    https://t.co/8XJVIXDpQz

    1.9K3583653126.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 20265.1x their median

    Last week, Argentina’s President Milei announced a new legal category for non-human corporations – companies run by #AI agents or robots. Like traditional corporations, they would be granted legal personhood. This could generate enormous new wealth, but very worryingly, it would also hand AIs an all-purpose key that grants access to our financial, economic and political systems. Full op-ed in today's @FT: https://t.co/w6DzOwByiq

    1.6K621211150800K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20264.7x their median

    https://t.co/nV5QAL9hgu

    1.8K324209136543K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.2x their median

    Our new image model generates images 2x faster than GPT-Image-2, currently the best model in the world. It's also 72% more efficient in GPU usage, so we can provide it at an incredible price. This gives it the best price-performance score in the world. Unbelievable work from the team. So much more to come! Try MAI-Image-2.6-Flash out now!

    1.9K15513542266K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20261.9x their median

    MAI-Image-2.5 has officially released from @MicrosoftAI landing at #2 in the Image Edit Arena (Single-Image-Edit) with a score of 1401 and advances the Pareto frontier! This puts the model +10 pts over Nano Banana 2, Grok Imagine Image Quality and ChatGPT-Image-Latest-High Fidelity. Congrats to the @MicrosoftAI team on this big accomplishment!

    981934031150K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 20261.6x their median

    So proud of the team today. Six months of super intense and outstanding work. I was honored to stand up and rep the work of the @MicrosoftAI lab at Build. Tons of technical detail we couldn't fit in the keynote, so we put it in a 109-page paper instead: https://t.co/EufnIb6xUM

    8877739984K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 531 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Posts are seen about 543K times each, and 0.098% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 46.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video, 40% are part of a thread and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 58K interactions, about 111x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Mustafa Suleyman's engagement rate on X?
Mustafa Suleyman (@mustafasuleyman) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,171,793 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, Mustafa Suleyman sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mustafasuleyman have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @mustafasuleyman post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going