Back to @musicradarclan's profile

Music Radar Clan engagement report

@musicradarclan - 47K followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
2.19%
of 47K followers
Per impression
1.13%
91K views on a typical post
Reach
193.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.139%
127 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 2.19%. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 193.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #anniversary, #kida, #radiohead. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #anniversary, #kida, #radiohead.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.19%, Music Radar Clan sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.671% to 2.53%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 164 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 8, 20263.0x their median

    John Lennon’s “Imagine” turns 55 years today. https://t.co/rm4XfV55qC

    2.3K64162115202K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.3x their median

    Researchers forced Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Kimi to play Civilization VI to completion. What they discovered exposes a terrifying blind spot in modern AI. Playing a massive 4X strategy game to the end requires something entirely different: long-haul execution. Juggling economics, science, military, and diplomacy across hundreds of turns. The goal was to see how AI handles multi-step complexity. Instead, they watched the models repeatedly implode due to two bizarre psychological flaws. Flaw number one: Total situational blindness. In one-third of the games the AIs lost, an enemy was actively marching toward an obvious victory right in front of them. The data was sitting right there. The model simply failed to look. Flaw number two: Severe organizational ADHD. The AIs were great at making grand strategic lists. They would meticulously write down: "Next step, build a city." Then, 10 turns later, they completely forgot they wrote it and did nothing. The researchers realized this isn't a lack of raw intelligence. It’s an allocation failure. We assume that if an AI can ace a math test, it can manage a complex, multi-day project. It can't. When tasks stretch across a long horizon, the model's internal attention drifts. It loses the thread of its own intentions. It drops long-term goals for immediate noise. Everyone is racing to hand over complex workflows, financial portfolios, and autonomous operations to AI agents. We think the bottleneck is making them smarter. but no. The bottleneck is making them remember what they were doing ten minutes ago.

    1.7K36815598207K viewsView on X
  • Dec 15, 20191.9x their median

    LOS MEJORES ÁLBUMES DE LA DÉCADA 2010. De Kanye West a los Arctic Monkeys, pasando por el Vaporwave. https://t.co/pxRdFc8HHR https://t.co/fHVZSAgBtd

    1.7K1667513View on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    Siempre tuve la teoría personal de que John Lennon escribió Imagine para que fuese su "Let It Be", porque quedó un tanto frustrado por el final de los Beatles. Lennon nunca fue muy fan de los temas a piano de Paul, y el último gran éxito de los Beatles fue Paul cantando Let It Be

    1.3K583711187K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    A raíz de lo que acaba de ocurrir con Open AI, he rescatado este capítulo de un ensayo que escribí hace tiempo y que no se llegó a publicar por discrepancias con la editorial. ...Intentaba explicar por qué todo esto es mucho más preocupante de lo que parece. https://t.co/MUJUsceKXq

    1.2K20411523K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    Estos días estamos de debate sobre el precio de los discos. Recordé un artículo que me encargaron el año pasado que incluía este párrafo. Me dijeron que era todo demasiado combativo y que si no lo cambiaba no lo publicarían. Así que se quedó sin publicar. https://t.co/oFWIdrUPAr

    93513323636K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    Today in 2000 Radiohead's album Kid A was released. What is your favorite track? #radiohead #KidA #anniversary https://t.co/BzSre1c6kT

    777130646347K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    En 2007 David Lynch contactó a su amigo Christian Louboutin para que hiciese unos zapatos para un proyecto suyo. La cosa se fue de madre. Acabaron sacando juntos la colección de zapatos más extrema que jamás se diseñó: FETISH https://t.co/6SJiXixbAp

    800464020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Otro 15 m no por favor, estuve allí y salí escopetado cuando montaron la carpa de reiki

    30121121091K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    Quién me iba a decir que la izquierda española se iba a convertir en los nuevos Llados.

    26386016K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#anniversary#kida#radiohead

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 2.19%. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 193.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.1K interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #anniversary, #kida, #radiohead. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Music Radar Clan's engagement rate on X?
Music Radar Clan (@musicradarclan) has an engagement rate of 2.19%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 47,139 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.19%, Music Radar Clan sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @musicradarclan have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @musicradarclan post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going