Back to @muselk's profile

Muselk engagement report

@muselk - 933K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.044%
of 933K followers
Per impression
1.11%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
4.02%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
417
interactions (median)
Saved
0.151%
57 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 417 interactions against 933K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 224x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.044%, Muselk sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 199 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 14, 2026224x their median

    NO SHOT THEY UN-NERFED TRACERS BUTT! Finally @Fortnite with the courage to do what @Blizzard_Ent wouldnt. The world needs heroes. https://t.co/OdQRVYNBz9

    90K2.7K4604074.0M viewsView on X
  • Apr 22, 202464x their median

    We want emotes to be a source of good vibes, but a few (*cough* Take the L *cough*) can sometimes feel a bit overly confrontational. Tomorrow's update will introduce a new Confrontational Emotes setting to toggle visibility on these Emotes. Learn more: https://t.co/QxxnmbFghD

    15K8035.7K4.9K7.8M viewsView on X
  • Feb 22, 202550x their median

    UPCOMING / UNFINISHED EXOTIC - "Jump Rocket Launcher" ‼️ [VIA @AllyJax_ & @RyanDoesLeaks] https://t.co/ivBveSOtdq

    19K7975995661.2M viewsView on X
  • Dec 7, 202448x their median

    Yo @LachlanYT they didnt bring back OG mushroom :( https://t.co/eXwCkifABF

    20K136322557K viewsView on X
  • Nov 4, 202346x their median

    Finally. Reuinited. #FortniteOG #FortniteChapter1 @chappadoodle https://t.co/qlpDrAY1sM

    18K1.4K140661.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202428x their median

    I LOVESHIELDS IN FORTNITE. I LOVESHIELDS IN FORTNITE.I LOVESHIELDS IN FORTNITE.I LOVESHIELDS IN FORTNITE.I LOVESHIELDS IN FORTNITE. https://t.co/yTGJhE3AoU

    8.0K1711.7K1.6K3.6M viewsView on X
  • Feb 9, 202625x their median

    Gangs Still Gamin https://t.co/VHviXXwL7B

    10K230104261.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202419x their median

    Still think about when @Lazarbeam & @Vikkstar123 recorded this video idea of mine with me (for everyone to post). At the end both of them said it was such a trash recording/ bad idea that they didnt even wanna use it. It was. But Its also my all time most viewed video. https://t.co/prkjIaWDO5

    7.7K43183291K viewsView on X
  • Dec 4, 202411x their median

    Gettin my Ch6 movement to the next level #Fortnite #FortniteC6S1鬼Hunters Map Code: 7475-9799-8601 https://t.co/tFifo531cE

    4.4K2414530976K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20247.2x their median

    PFFFT this new Fall Guys stuff in @FortniteGame is eas- damn... https://t.co/7RkPKlL9dm

    2.8K173205244K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 417 interactions against 933K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 224x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Muselk's engagement rate on X?
Muselk (@muselk) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 932,643 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.044%, Muselk sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @muselk have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @muselk post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going