Back to @mufc_ml's profile

فـيرغي تايم engagement report

@mufc_ml - 77K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 77K followers
Per impression
1.33%
2.5K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
33
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 566x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

فـيرغي تايم's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, فـيرغي تايم sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 175 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 2026566x their median

    In addition to all the reaction to Martinez speaking out. Remember someone leaked out the team and change of tactics 12 hours before kick off yesterday. And it 100% wasn't Martinez. So let's not pretend he's the only one pissed off

    18K94113121372K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026198x their median

    Bruno Fernandes has lost possession more times (106) than any other outfield player in the Premier League this season. 😬 https://t.co/MGkBzvOQ8Y

    4.9K978215452318K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202642x their median

    🚨 Jason Wilcox’s CV vs proven Directors of Football at top clubs: - Hugo Viana (Man City) Ex-player. Sporting CP Director of Football from 2018 - delivered 2 league titles while rebuilding the club through smart sales and coaching appointments (including Amorim). He then stepped into Txiki Begiristain’s established City machine as a proven operator. - Andrea Berta (Arsenal) 12 years at Atlético Madrid. 2 La Liga titles, a Europa League, and 2 Champions League finals. Oversaw high-level deals involving Griezmann, Oblak, Rodri and others. Arrived at Arsenal in 2025 and helped end a 22-year title drought. Understands how a big club operates under real pressure. - Christoph Freund (Bayern) 17 years inside the Red Bull Salzburg talent factory before moving to Munich. Contract extended to 2029. His role is continuity and pipeline-building, not learning on the job at a superclub. - Luís Campos (PSG) Europe’s closest thing to a transfer specialist as a brand. Built title-winning squads at Monaco and Lille. At PSG since 2022 as football advisor/sporting lead - shifted the club from ageing superstars toward younger profiles (Vitinha, Neves, Pacho, Kvaratskhelia etc.) in alignment with Luis Enrique. Now on a deal through 2030 after sustained Champions League success. At Manchester United, Jason Wilcox arrived with little to no senior DoF track record. Other elite clubs appoint people with proven histories of identifying and securing the right players, not just available ones. Under Wilcox and INEOS the pattern has been different: prioritising cheaper options over the quality and profile that top-level competition demands.

    1.1K2304939276K viewsView on X
  • Apr 3, 202560x their median

    حقيقه https://t.co/ZVMWNtSOba

    66782197135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202610x their median

    كُتب على جدران مدينة مانشستر ان الورقة التي اسقطها بول سكولز التقطها كوبي ماينو https://t.co/PUkSIW6Uw6

    31610407.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202610.0x their median

    للاسف لازم نتقبل بأن ليفربول رايح للهاوية الوضع دمار

    2291286229K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20267.0x their median

    ريحنا من لوك شاو يا رب https://t.co/y2Mh2u25yq

    199624223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20266.5x their median

    هذي لقطه ايقونيه و درس في ادارة رتم المباراه الترجمه : حافظ على الكوره يا زباله https://t.co/YPZTaU2gGT

    21150016K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20263.8x their median

    باليبا هههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه يا فتاح يا عليم https://t.co/8euCOdtyPa

    1212208.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.2x their median

    أنت تستمر في تغيير المدربين لكن ماذا عن المناطق الأخرى؟ من السهل قول ، المدرب ، اللاعبين لكن يجب أن ننظر أيضًا إلى الآخرين أليس كذلك ؟ يقصد (الإدارة) مقطع الموسم حرفياً https://t.co/u1Em65ISj0

    683102.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 77K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 566x its own typical post.

What is فـيرغي تايم's engagement rate on X?
فـيرغي تايم (@mufc_ml) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 77,412 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, فـيرغي تايم sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mufc_ml have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mufc_ml post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going