Back to @mtgreenee's profile

Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 engagement report

@mtgreenee - 1.7M followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.263%
of 1.7M followers
Per impression
4.55%
98K views on a typical post
Reach
5.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.09%
88 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 4.4K interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.263%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 4.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.263%, Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 364 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 27, 202619x their median

    Hop in... best dimension yet. https://t.co/7dRJnUVANc

    61K11K7.6K5.7K22M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202617x their median

    Every Republican Senator voted to merge our military with Israel’s military. The most America LAST thing they could possibly do, selling our military out to a foreign country. It’s absolute treason and betrayal.

    65K12K2.1K449944K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202618x their median

    Late stage MAGA is so disgusting and unrecognizable to me, and I find this shocking as one who attended more Trump rallies than I can count. A woman with a “Release The Epstein Files” shirt stands at a Trump rally shouting at Trump to release the Epstein files and gets physically beaten by the MAGA men around her, who probably call themselves Christians. Then our obese President makes fun of her calling her “fat” and “him” claiming she’s a paid protestor. She got thrown out and the men who attacked her got to stay. MAGA rallies used to be filled with people who agreed with releasing the Epstein files, defended women, and would step in if a woman was attacked. Now the dying remnant of MAGA is made up of people who emulate their cult leader. Attacking women, making fun of their looks, and turning on the victims of the elites. It’s a cult, an ugly grotesque cult that does not display Christian values because the cult leader himself is not a Christian even though the vast majority who attend his rallies would identify as Christian. Know them by their fruit. The fruit is rotten. Because the cult leader himself is a wolf in sheep’s clothing who has led the flock astray.

    57K11K8.0K1.5K3.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202616x their median

    California diesel $8.49 but Georgia is $6.59, both RIDICULOUS!!! The fuel crisis is only just beginning. https://t.co/HEE5i1TxM2

    52K11K8.4K1.5K7.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202616x their median

    Gen X defined: Ages 45-61 Looks 35-40 Will 100% throw hands Doesn't care about your feelings Cusses a lot Will make you cry with words Great work ethic Pragmatic Zero tolerance for stupidity Skeptical of authority Doesn't trust anyone at 1st Extremely loyal friend Figures shit out Most likely your boss Works hard, plays hard No fear Sarcastic as fuck Still listens to the same music Knows lyrics to Rock, Rap & Country Proficient in analog & digital tech Self reliant Adaptable to any environment Just wants to be left alone

    57K9.5K3.1K2.1K2.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202615x their median

    I ranch with my 85 year old Dad who has been a die hard Trump fan. Whenever I criticize any Trump decision, even slightly, he’ll get personally offended and won’t want to talk about it. So I’ve avoided voicing my disdain over his attacks on Massie, spending, Ag, etc. when Dad is in the room. Today, after the beef import announcement, Dad shook his head, sadly, and said, “you know, I really don’t think he gives a damn about anyone who isn’t rich, and sure not about ranchers. Never wanted to believe that until today.” There wasn’t a more stalwart Trump supporter on the planet. Trump is losing the room.

    58K7.2K2.5K4701.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202610x their median

    In 2025, Trump bailed out Argentina with $20 billion dollars currency swap. Now Trump is going to buy 300,000 metric tons of ground beef apparently from Argentina undercutting the American cattlemen. Trump claims Argentina is dying and they need the help. Actually it’s the American cattle industry that is suffering and dying with an average of 77 cattle producers going out of business every day. Put Americans FIRST!!!

    36K6.6K2.5K305852K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20268.7x their median

    Artificial Intelligence. https://t.co/VAs0lP0iA6

    32K3.1K3.1K492904K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20267.5x their median

    The government is telling you that you're going to eat foreign ground beef and you're gonna like it and it's gonna lower beef prices. That's about as America LAST as we can get when the president is undercutting our own ranchers. This is outrageous. 🚨 https://t.co/p3CBOQH6z1

    23K5.8K3.8K368463K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20266.8x their median

    How many days has it been since anyone has seen Mitch McConnell alive?

    27K2.5K1.3K93975K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.4K interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.263%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 4.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) has an engagement rate of 0.263%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,692,231 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.263%, Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mtgreenee have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mtgreenee post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going