Back to @mr_tactic's profile

mr_tactic engagement report

@mr_tactic - 161K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.055%
of 161K followers
Per impression
2.07%
4.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
88
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 88 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 2.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

mr_tactic's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.055%, mr_tactic sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 160 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 5, 2022109x their median

    سأله الصحفي لماذا غادرت المباراة قبل نهايتها؟ كان رده : إبنتي صغيرة ولا أرغب أن تحزن ولكنني متأكد أننا سنعود ونحقق الريمونتادا وبعدها بثواني مع هدف رودريغو صرخ.. عدنااا https://t.co/bOl1w8nzuv

    7.6K1.6K93289View on X
  • Oct 21, 202618x their median

    ما حاول فعله تشابي ألونسو الموسم الماضي نجح فيه مورينيو هذا الموسم .. تخيلوا أن فينيسيوس هذا الموسم لم يلعب سوى ثلاث مباريات كاملة مع ريال مدريد.. الفرق بين مورينيو وألونسو هو أن سلطة مورينيو أقوى بالتعامل مع لاعب كنوعية فينيسيوس .. https://t.co/tXNHdQKGYV

    1.4K43591393K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20268.9x their median

    لما تشوف وسط باريس تعرف أنه إنتهى زمن الارتكاز على نوعية تشواميني .. الوسط الآن أصبح يعتمد على الامكانيات الفنية لا القوة البدنية .. فيتينيا ونيفيز عاملين شوط أول أثل ما يقال عنه عظييم .. كيف يخرجون بالكرة تحت الضغط فتنة.. وريال مدريد عندهم تشواميني وفالفيردي

    7123829723K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20267.1x their median

    فلسفة أطباء ريال مدريد جعلتهم يخسرون موهبة كهذه .. عبد الله وزان كان إنتقل إلى ريال مدريد كلاعب حر يعني 0 يورو لكن للأطباء النادي كان رأي آخر https://t.co/xXIyHK9sbS

    61566138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20264.3x their median

    مورينيو : هنالك أناس دفعوا ثمن التذكرة من أجل أن يستمتعوا بثنائية مبابي وديوماندي وقد إستمتعوا بذلك https://t.co/mmIQUfj0Gn

    3706105.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.0x their median

    مورينيو : إذا ترون أن هذه اللقطات ليست بطاقة حمراء فلا داعي لأن نكمل المؤتمر الصحفي https://t.co/2Ck4m7KcM5

    34016004.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20263.5x their median

    جماهير ريال مدريد بعد المباراة - الريال كانوا أفضل والسبب غياب فينيسيوس - بدون فينيسيوس نحن أفضل بالملعب - الخبر الجيد هو غياب فينيسيوس - أفضل ثلاثين بالأمام ؟ الأفضل هو أن يغيب فينيسيوس ولا مشكلة في من يلعب غيره https://t.co/JKIE8OtuDO

    289191115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.5x their median

    🚨🎥 مترجم | 🤡 خوسي فيليكس دياز مدير تحرير يومية الـ as والذي سيصوت على مبابي من أجل الكرة الذهبية : 🔹مبابي خائن ورجل مسكين. 🔸يا مبابي انت لست رياضياً، وليست لديك كلمة، ولست رجلاً.. الأمر بهذا الوضوح. 🔹ستكون لاعباً كبيراً جداً، لكنك لن تكون أبداً رجلاً عظيماً. https://t.co/Dgwv9ePvuw

    248429644K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20263.1x their median

    كوكوريلا اليوم ما رحمه ولا لقطة .. ولا مراوغة .. كوكوريلا كان كابوسه اليوم .. لامين ضد كوكوريلا تحول للاعب عادي بلا حلول https://t.co/MjI4ZNAJ50

    25022316.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.1x their median

    خوسي لويس سانشيز : حينما يلعبون برشلونة في أوروبا فإنهم يعودون إلى حجمهم الطبيعي .. https://t.co/lVg8b5bUwC

    24823315.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 88 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 2.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.6K interactions, about 109x its own typical post.

What is mr_tactic's engagement rate on X?
mr_tactic (@mr_tactic) has an engagement rate of 0.055%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 160,724 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.055%, mr_tactic sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mr_tactic have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mr_tactic post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going