Dr. Mohamed Qasem د. محمد قاسم engagement report
@mqasem - 735K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 380 interactions against 735K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 0.757% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dr. Mohamed Qasem د. محمد قاسم's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.052%, Dr. Mohamed Qasem د. محمد قاسم sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 74% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 335 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 10, 202638x their median
اللي سووا هالحركة المفروض يرقونه، ويعطونه مكافأة وإجازة 3 أشهر. فعلا إبداع لا يوصف. https://t.co/Mra3jy1iWm
- Aug 13, 202611x their median
أروع لقطة التقطت أمس أثناء الكسوف الكلي بإسبانيا. واو!! المتزلج المحترف Danny León وفريقه أعدوا منحدرا على حافة الشمس حيث سيكون الكسوف، ثم تزلج عليه وقفز في الهواء ليصبح في مركز للحظة، لقطة مذهلة ليس لها مثيل. https://t.co/sP9P8b5GbL
- Sep 28, 20268.3x their median
Maybe if physics had always been this easy to visualize and learn, we might have had more physicists than ever. AI is making learning so much easier to understand and actually fun. This is an electromagnetic field visualization built using Claude Opus 5.5. I do not think I have ever understood this subject better than I did by simply seeing it visualized like this 😅
- Aug 19, 20267.9x their median
A small sneak peek of something we’ve been working on for the past 12 months. Together with @Qualcomm, we’ve been designing the next generation of the HUMAIN AI PC - bringing CPU, GPU and NPU together to run AI models locally, on the device. I’m excited about the hardware. But the hardware isn’t the part I’m most excited about. The real question is: what operating system is running on it? What happens when we rethink the operating system for an agentic AI world... not around apps, but around intent? Stay tuned. We’ll reveal much more at #LEAP. #HUMAIN #TheEndOfLimits @HUMAIN
- Sep 7, 20266.3x their median
Warren McCulloch, the father of neural networks, talks AI in 1962. https://t.co/Pm5LOEbnfJ
- Sep 29, 20265.6x their median
Opus 5.5 imagined the moment Girl with a Pearl Earring was painted https://t.co/HENuxxvXNh
- Sep 6, 20264.9x their median
يا جماعة من لم يستخدم نموذج الذكاء الاصطناعي Astra ضيع نص عمره.
- Sep 6, 20263.1x their median
انقطعت الكهرباء عن عدة مناطق في الكويت. قبل فترة ركبت ألواح شمسية وبطاريات. بيتي يعمل الآن على الطاقة الشمسية. https://t.co/Ay16TtKVh6
- Aug 27, 20263.1x their median
هنا تظهر أهمية الألم. الإنسان لا يستمر إذا شعر بالألم، الروبوت يكمل إلى أن يتحطم. الألم حماية من الانهيار التام. https://t.co/dDHAcGe4Og
- Aug 15, 20262.3x their median
هؤلاء مجموعة من الناس عاديين، يركبون كاميرات، ويصورون أنفسهم وهو يقومون بأعمال منزلية مقابل مبالغ بسيطة. بعد ذلك ترسل هذه المعلومات إلى شركات لتستخدمها لتدريب الروبوتات على العمالة المنزلية. الإنسان يقود نفسه بنفسه إلى الهاوية. https://t.co/XONql2XfVa
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 380 interactions against 735K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 0.757% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.
- What is Dr. Mohamed Qasem د. محمد قاسم's engagement rate on X?
- Dr. Mohamed Qasem د. محمد قاسم (@mqasem) has an engagement rate of 0.052%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 734,663 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.052%, Dr. Mohamed Qasem د. محمد قاسم sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @mqasem have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @mqasem post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.