Back to @mowlihawk's profile

MOWLIHAWK engagement report

@mowlihawk - 76K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.149%
of 76K followers
Per impression
0.737%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
20.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
108
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 108 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 0.149%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.737% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 261x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026. Recurring tag: #lomásleído.

Compared with accounts its own size

MOWLIHAWK's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.149%, MOWLIHAWK sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video54% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 54% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 106 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 2026261x their median

    🔴 Antonio Banderas dedica un premio a los ciudadanos de Ceuta: ESTE HOMBRE ES UN GRANDE DE ESPAÑA Y PUNTO https://t.co/6mn2SQa2pZ

    23K4.5K24482331K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026158x their median

    Pregunto a PODEMOS cuándo van a convocar una manifestación por la 21 niñas víctimas de agresiones sexuales en Ceuta, y me responden atacándome por haber entrado en España legalmente. La preocupación de la izquierda es si el agresor sexual ha comido. @periodistadigit https://t.co/5SDq3wQwou

    13K3.8K37363299K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026152x their median

    Bunu yapabilecek bir sanatçı adı ver ?? https://t.co/utspGxi6yS

    10K3364.8K1.1K2.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026138x their median

    El otro día fui a pescar al estrecho de Gibraltar y vino dos veces la guardia civil para ver que estábamos pescando. Estos cabrones sacan un delfín se lo comen a bocados mientras lo graban con un iPhone 17 y la Cruz Moha les da bocadillos de Chope. VIVA ESPAÑA! 🇪🇸

    13K2.0K8316119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202643x their median

    Manu Sánchez eres la mayor desgracia que ha parido Andalucía.

    4.1K38718030246K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202639x their median

    Hola @sanchezcastejon quiero wifi gratis, que tengo que rellenar o que tengo que ocupar para que se habilite?

    3.6K29533945254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202626x their median

    Aquí el camarada Manu Sánchez descojonandose de los tiesos que lo defienden a capa y espada como adalid de la izquierda woke! https://t.co/iZHIccqWL6

    1.9K396356651.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202618x their median

    Si está el Príncipe en Ceuta. https://t.co/Wv393MMFlV

    1.6K2417736335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202613x their median

    #LoMásLeído| Los marroquíes, entre los menos inteligentes del mundo según un ranking de CEOWORLD: Marruecos cae al puesto 174 de 199 países https://t.co/v7ZR4o3tAn

    9853121213741K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202613x their median

    El día 8 voy a Ceuta y como están todos los hoteles full voy a acampar en la playa del Trampolín. Espero que la policía no me eche

    1.3K4445139K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lomásleído

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 108 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 0.149%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.737% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 261x its own typical post.

What is MOWLIHAWK's engagement rate on X?
MOWLIHAWK (@mowlihawk) has an engagement rate of 0.149%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 75,771 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.149%, MOWLIHAWK sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mowlihawk have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mowlihawk post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going