ใซใณใซใณ๐ฅจ๐ใซใใใใ engagement report
@mo_lunlun_gu - 501K followers on X
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 7.7K interactions against 501K followers, an engagement rate of 1.53%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 170K times each, and 4.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 52% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 170K interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ใกใใพใใ, #shorts, #ใใใใ.
Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #ใกใใพใใ, #shorts, #ใใใใ.
Compared with accounts its own size
ใซใณใซใณ๐ฅจ๐ใซใใใใ's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.53%, ใซใณใซใณ๐ฅจ๐ใซใใใใ sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.671% to 2.53%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 41% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 52% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 52% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 23, 202623x their median
ใใใใใใ ไฝ่ชฟใฎใใใใชใๆฅใใกใใฃใจใใคๅขใใฆใใไธ่ฉฑไฟใใใจ็ธ่ซใๅฐใใฎ้ใไผใฟใใใใ ใใใจใซใชใใพใใใ ใไบบ้ใใใใกใจๆฅฝใใ้ใใใใใซใ้ทใใใฐใซใใใใใซใใกใใฃใจๅพ ใฃใฆใฆใใใใใจๅฌใใใงใ๏ผ๏ผ
- Aug 30, 202619x their median
ใไบบ้ใใใไน ใใถใใงใ๐ถ ใไผใฟใใใใใใใใ ใๅ ๆฐๆบใฟใณใซใชใใพใใ๏ผโ ๆ ใๆๆฅ19ๆใๅพฉๅธฐ้ ไฟกใใใพใใฎใงใใใฃใใ้ใณใซๆฅใฆใใ ใใโผ https://t.co/KqPavRqSFP
- Jul 4, 202616x their median
ใไบบ้ใใใฏใกใใพใฎๅ ใงใ ๆบใงใ ใใฃใจใใฏใชใใใใใใใใฃใจ้ฃใซใใใใใๅฐใใฎ้ใไผใฟใใพใ๏ผ ๅฟใใใฎๅคงๅฅฝใใซๅบไผใใฆใๆใใใฆใใใชใซๅนธใใช็ฃใใใฆใใใฎใงใใใใ ใ้ฃฏใใฃใฑใ้ฃในใฆๅธๅฃใงๆฒขๅฑฑๅฏใฆๆฅฝใใใใจใใฆใๅ็ฃ่ฉฑใ่ฑๆใซใใฆใพใไผใใซใใพใ ใ ใใใใงใ๏ผ๏ผ
- Aug 31, 202611x their median
ใใใซใกใฏ๏ผ ใจใใจใๆฌๆฅๅพฉๅธฐใงใ๐ซ ใใฃใจๅฟ่ใใใฏใใฏใใฆใใใฆใฆใฎๅ ใใใใฎใใใใฏใญใฆๅฟ่ใซใชใฃใใฟใใใงใ
- Jul 1, 20269.6x their median
ใใใใจใใใใใพใใ๏ผ๏ผ 7/4ใพใง็ญใใงใใใใใใๅฟใใฆใใพใใใใ็ฉใใใงๅชใใใไบบ้ใใใจใฎๆ้ใๅคงๅฅฝใใงใ ใ่ นๅ ญๅใชใฃใกใใใพใใใใใฏใใ ใใใใงใ ใพใๆๆฅไผใใพใใใใใใใใฟใชใใ๐๏ธ
- Sep 5, 20268.1x their median
ใๅ็ฅใ ๆๆฅ19ๆ๏ฝ๐ถ ๆฐ่กฃ่ฃ ใฎใๆซ้ฒ็ฎใใใใใพใ๏ผ๏ผ ใชใใ ใใใพใใใใฉใซใ ใงใ ไปๅใ็่กฃใใฆใใพใใใใใไบบ้ใใใ็่กฃๅพ ๆฉใใฆใใใใใใใใใใงใ๏ผ https://t.co/fA51pqG0bb
- Aug 31, 20267.1x their median
้ ไฟกใใใใจใใใใใพใใ๏ผ๏ผ ็ทๅผตใง่ฃใใใใงใใใๆใใ่ฟใใฆใใใฆๆฅฝใใใ่ฉฑใงใใพใใ๐ ไผๆญขไธญใซๆฒขๅฑฑๆฌ่ชญใใงใใใฎ่ฉฑใใพใใใใใงใโผ๏ธ ๆๆฅใใ9ๆใใใฎๅนดใฎ8ๆใฎ็ตใใใซใไผใใงใใฆๅ ๆ ใงใใ ๅพฎๅฆไปฅไธใฏใฉใใใใ้ใใใฆใใกใใพใฎใจใใใซๅธฐใฃใฆใใฆใใใใๅฌใใใงใ๏ผ
- Jun 24, 20266.4x their median
ใใงใใใใฆใใพใ๏ผ
- Oct 19, 20264.5x their median
๏ผผแ ๆฌๆฅ20ๆใใ้ ไฟก้ๅง แ๏ผ ๐ธ ๆๆณใฏ #ใซใใฑใใใ ๐ธ #ใคใใฉใใ ใใใ#้ทๅฐพๆฏ ใใใ#ใซใณใซใณ ใใ ใๅๅฃไนฑ่ใฑใใใใๅบ้ฃโ๏ธ https://t.co/0sGlkwI0F6 ๆฝ้ธใง50ๅๆงใซๆๅคง8,260ๅๅใฎ ใใในใPayใๅฝใใ๏ผ โผๅๅ ๆนๆณ โ @touken_puzzleใใฉใญใผ โกๆฌๆ็จฟใใชใในใ ใ๏ผ10ๆ22ๆฅ(ๆจ)19:59ใพใง #ใฑใใใ #ๅๅฃไนฑ่
- Oct 12, 20264.2x their median
ในใฟใผใฉใคใใ่ใใใฆใใๅคใๆณกใๅนใใฆๅใใพใใใใ็ฃไธ่ฒซ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 7.7K interactions against 501K followers, an engagement rate of 1.53%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 170K times each, and 4.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 34.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video and 52% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 170K interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ใกใใพใใ, #shorts, #ใใใใ.
- What is ใซใณใซใณ๐ฅจ๐ใซใใใใ's engagement rate on X?
- ใซใณใซใณ๐ฅจ๐ใซใใใใ (@mo_lunlun_gu) has an engagement rate of 1.53%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 500,542 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.53%, ใซใณใซใณ๐ฅจ๐ใซใใใใ sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @mo_lunlun_gu have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @mo_lunlun_gu post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.