Back to @mjrdzayr337191's profile

الشؤون العالمية engagement report

@mjrdzayr337191 - 122K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 122K followers
Per impression
0.758%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.758% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 548 interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

الشؤون العالمية's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, الشؤون العالمية sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 4, 202620x their median

    🔥 عندما اصطدمت أساطيل البحرية الأمريكية بموجات طائرات الكاميكازي اليابانية. مشاهد نادرة ومرعبة من معارك عامي 1944 و1945، توثّق واحدة من أكثر المواجهات الجوية دموية في حرب المحيط الهادئ. https://t.co/t1XiQEEWd4

    499444130K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202617x their median

    جندي روسي يطلق صاروخ منظومة 9K38 Igla لاعتراض مسيّرة أوكرانية من طراز FPV/Liutyi، قبل ثوانٍ فقط من وصولها إلى منشأة لتخزين النفط في موسكو. https://t.co/vOwxv5HlAg

    447365085K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202610x their median

    هذه العمليات الجهادية ضد القوات الأمريكية كانت من أهم العوامل التي ساهمت في إنهاء الاحتلال الأمريكي للعراق. هذه العمليات كبدت القوات الأمريكية نحو 4500 قتيلًا ، وأكثر من 31,900 جريح. https://t.co/bZBZrEM20z

    250287013K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20265.4x their median

    لحظة استهداف روسي لجسر في كييف باستخدام مسيرة انتحارية من طراز جيران-5. https://t.co/w9PInrUr8J

    14560110K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20264.4x their median

    أقوى سلاح نووي فُجّر في تاريخ البشرية! في 30 أكتوبر 1961، فجّر الاتحاد السوفيتي «قنبلة القيصر» فوق نوفايا زيمليا، في أعظم انفجار من صنع الإنسان على الإطلاق. 💥 القوة: 50 ميغاطن من TNT 🔥 تعادل نحو 50 مليون طن من المتفجرات التقليدية ☁️ سحابة الفطر: ارتفعت إلى نحو 60–70 كم 🌍 موجة الصدمة: دارت حول الأرض 3 مرات 👁️ الوميض: شوهد على مسافات تصل إلى نحو 1,000 كم 🪟 تحطم الزجاج: سُجّل على مسافات تجاوزت 700 كم من موقع التفجير. هذا ليس مجرد اختبار نووي… بل أقوى انفجار صنعه الإنسان على الإطلاق. ☢️

    101165011K viewsView on X
  • Mar 25, 20264.2x their median

    أسألكم الدعاء لأبي 🤍 اللهم اغفر له، وارحمه، وعافه واعفُ عنه، واجعل الجنة داره، وارزق كل من دعا له الأجر والبركة.

    98810146K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.9x their median

    قبل عامين وفي مثل هذا اليوم، أطلقت إيران عملية «الوعد الصادق 2» في هجوم صاروخي واسع على إسرائيل، مستخدمةً نحو 200 صاروخ باليستي. هجومٌ دخل التاريخ باعتباره أكبر هجوم باليستية في التاريخ. https://t.co/MyLTD03cWD

    753305.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20261.9x their median

    🚀 الصين تقترب من تغيير قواعد إطلاق الصواريخ إلى الفضاء! مشروع «天弓» (القوس السماوي) يعتمد على مسار كهرومغناطيسي فائق التوصيل لتسريع إطلاق الصاروخ على الأرض قبل إشعال محركاته. الفكرة قد تقلل استهلاك الوقود في أصعب مراحل الإطلاق، وتزيد الحمولة التي يمكن إيصالها إلى المدار، وتخفض تكلفة الإطلاق. وقد أجرت الصين بالفعل اختبارات لهذه التقنية في سيتشوان، فيما تعمل على تكييف صاروخ «سيرس-2» معها، تمهيدًا لمحاولة إطلاق مداري بمساعدة كهرومغناطيسية بحلول عام 2028.

    476003.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20261.8x their median

    القناة 12 الإسرائيلية: كان مساعد الطيار يخطط لإسقاط الطائرة أو تنفيذ عمل إرهابي مشابه لهجوم 11 سبتمبر. https://t.co/eMkVJF1wKF

    433214.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20261.7x their median

    وقوع انفجار في مستودعات الذخيرة بقاعدة تفنتاز الجوية السورية. وهو المستوع الرابع للذخيرة الذي يقع فيه انفجار هذا الشهر. الموساد عامل جهد جبار لاضعاف سوريا بكل الطرق. https://t.co/lPc6Fjvm0S

    405204.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.758% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 548 interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is الشؤون العالمية's engagement rate on X?
الشؤون العالمية (@mjrdzayr337191) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 121,921 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, الشؤون العالمية sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mjrdzayr337191 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mjrdzayr337191 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going