Morgan J. Freeman engagement report
@mjfree - 638K followers on X
Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 772 interactions against 638K followers, an engagement rate of 0.122%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 4.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 148K interactions, about 192x its own typical post.
Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tag: #bluewavein30days.
Compared with accounts its own size
Morgan J. Freeman's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.122%, Morgan J. Freeman sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 59% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 19% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 166 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 10, 2026192x their median
😱😱😱 And just like that, it’s completely VANISHED from the media. A sitting congressman, Ted Lieu, said on the record the Epstein files are being blocked because they show Trump raped and threatened to kill children. Lets make this viral again 👇 https://t.co/tw0oVgyPOq
- Aug 24, 202687x their median
🚨 BREAKING: "We will not prosecute the abusers named in the Epstein files or reveal their names to the public." — Todd Blanche, US Attorney General https://t.co/mQp0kjZgJC
- Oct 5, 202632x their median
🇺🇸 Rep. Ted Lieu says there is “ample evidence” in the full Epstein files alleging Donald Trump raped children. “This is all on videotape.” https://t.co/X6PRNdGGDZ
- Sep 1, 202632x their median
Good morning ☀️☀️☀️ https://t.co/C6GS55FX25
- Oct 5, 202631x their median
🚨🚨🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: An election group just found evidence sufficient to potentially change The 2024 presidential election results from Trump to Harris. We all knew he was cheating, now we have proof. He must be removed from office immediately. https://t.co/bHTKmEg3zq
- Sep 1, 202627x their median
If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. And he knows it…
- Sep 11, 202622x their median
DONALD TRUMP WAS TOLD HE COULDN’T GIVE A SPEECH AT TODAY’S 9/11 MEMORIAL CEREMONY So he didn’t show up. Let it sink in... For years, politicians have not been permitted to give speeches at the official Ground Zero ceremony. The day is deliberately kept focused on the victims, their families and the people who ran toward those burning buildings. Clinton showed up today. Bush showed up. Obama showed up. Biden showed up. None of them needed a microphone. None of them needed applause. None of them needed September 11 to be about them. Donald Trump wanted to speak. When Ground Zero wouldn't give him the stage, he ran to the Pentagon where he could demand one. And he gave his speech anyway. Like a petulant child who couldn't get his way, the President of the United States apparently couldn't simply stand silently with the families and honor their dead. He needed a microphone. He needed a stage. He needed to make himself part of the story. That is what makes this so profoundly disrespectful. 2,977 people were murdered on September 11. Thousands of families woke up this morning remembering a husband, wife, mother, father, son, daughter, brother, sister or friend who never came home. Their grief does not belong to Donald Trump. Their sacrifice is not a backdrop for Donald Trump. September 11 is not a Donald Trump event. There are days when a president should lead. There are days when a president should speak. And there are days when a president should shut up the fuck up, bow his head, and remember the dead. Today was one of those days. NOT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT YOU, DONALD. Especially not 9/11.
- Sep 10, 202619x their median
Great question. https://t.co/SMYt9WZiTb
- Oct 4, 202619x their median
Nazi Hegseth must go! https://t.co/poFwTT9u9b
- Sep 11, 202619x their median
https://t.co/a3WBQ4uiIP
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 772 interactions against 638K followers, an engagement rate of 0.122%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 4.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 148K interactions, about 192x its own typical post.
- What is Morgan J. Freeman's engagement rate on X?
- Morgan J. Freeman (@mjfree) has an engagement rate of 0.122%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 637,650 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.122%, Morgan J. Freeman sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @mjfree have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @mjfree post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.77 posts per day across the measured window.