Back to @mjfree's profile

Morgan J. Freeman engagement report

@mjfree - 638K followers on X

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.122%
of 638K followers
Per impression
4.29%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
2.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
772
interactions (median)
Saved
0.053%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.77/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 772 interactions against 638K followers, an engagement rate of 0.122%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 4.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 148K interactions, about 192x its own typical post.

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tag: #bluewavein30days.

Compared with accounts its own size

Morgan J. Freeman's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.122%, Morgan J. Freeman sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video59% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 166 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 10, 2026192x their median

    😱😱😱 And just like that, it’s completely VANISHED from the media. A sitting congressman, Ted Lieu, said on the record the Epstein files are being blocked because they show Trump raped and threatened to kill children. Lets make this viral again 👇 https://t.co/tw0oVgyPOq

    105K42K7475451.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202687x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: "We will not prosecute the abusers named in the Epstein files or reveal their names to the public." — Todd Blanche, US Attorney General https://t.co/mQp0kjZgJC

    45K14K4.8K3.8K13M viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202632x their median

    🇺🇸 Rep. Ted Lieu says there is “ample evidence” in the full Epstein files alleging Donald Trump raped children. “This is all on videotape.” https://t.co/X6PRNdGGDZ

    18K5.5K1.4K128157K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202632x their median

    Good morning ☀️☀️☀️ https://t.co/C6GS55FX25

    22K1.9K13338309K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202631x their median

    🚨🚨🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: An election group just found evidence sufficient to potentially change The 2024 presidential election results from Trump to Harris. We all knew he was cheating, now we have proof. He must be removed from office immediately. https://t.co/bHTKmEg3zq

    17K4.9K2.0K215432K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202627x their median

    If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. If everyone votes, Trump loses. And he knows it…

    15K4.0K1.4K111143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202622x their median

    DONALD TRUMP WAS TOLD HE COULDN’T GIVE A SPEECH AT TODAY’S 9/11 MEMORIAL CEREMONY So he didn’t show up. Let it sink in... For years, politicians have not been permitted to give speeches at the official Ground Zero ceremony. The day is deliberately kept focused on the victims, their families and the people who ran toward those burning buildings. Clinton showed up today. Bush showed up. Obama showed up. Biden showed up. None of them needed a microphone. None of them needed applause. None of them needed September 11 to be about them. Donald Trump wanted to speak. When Ground Zero wouldn't give him the stage, he ran to the Pentagon where he could demand one. And he gave his speech anyway. Like a petulant child who couldn't get his way, the President of the United States apparently couldn't simply stand silently with the families and honor their dead. He needed a microphone. He needed a stage. He needed to make himself part of the story. That is what makes this so profoundly disrespectful. 2,977 people were murdered on September 11. Thousands of families woke up this morning remembering a husband, wife, mother, father, son, daughter, brother, sister or friend who never came home. Their grief does not belong to Donald Trump. Their sacrifice is not a backdrop for Donald Trump. September 11 is not a Donald Trump event. There are days when a president should lead. There are days when a president should speak. And there are days when a president should shut up the fuck up, bow his head, and remember the dead. Today was one of those days. NOT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT YOU, DONALD. Especially not 9/11.

    12K4.0K290124170K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202619x their median

    Great question. https://t.co/SMYt9WZiTb

    11K3.8K54315086K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202619x their median

    Nazi Hegseth must go! https://t.co/poFwTT9u9b

    11K3.0K2917297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202619x their median

    https://t.co/a3WBQ4uiIP

    12K2.0K28232116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bluewavein30days

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 772 interactions against 638K followers, an engagement rate of 0.122%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 4.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 148K interactions, about 192x its own typical post.

What is Morgan J. Freeman's engagement rate on X?
Morgan J. Freeman (@mjfree) has an engagement rate of 0.122%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 637,650 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.122%, Morgan J. Freeman sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mjfree have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mjfree post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going