Pavão Misterious engagement report
@misteriouspavao - 307K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 307K followers, an engagement rate of 0.717%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Pavão Misterious's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.717%, Pavão Misterious sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 91% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 151 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 14, 202613x their median
It's so sad that we now live in a world where advertising such products has become a necessity. https://t.co/DMjIAe8Ljg
- Oct 15, 202612x their median
Galera reta final, compartilhem por favor! Votem Flavio Bolsonaro! https://t.co/to1iul4aWH
- Sep 5, 20269.2x their median
NOTA OFICIAL Recebo com absoluta perplexidade a notícia de que estaria sendo cogitada pela Presidência do Senado a abertura de um suposto “impeachment cruzado” envolvendo os ministros Alexandre de Moraes e André Mendonça. ESPERO SINCERAMENTE QUE ESSA INFORMAÇÃO NÃO SEJA VERDADEIRA. Seria uma aberração institucional transformar impeachment em instrumento de compensação política. Não existe “um ministro de cada lado”. Não existe empate. Não existe troca. EXISTEM FATOS, PROVAS E RESPONSABILIDADES INDIVIDUAIS. Há anos o Senado recebe sucessivos pedidos de impeachment contra Alexandre de Moraes. Nesta semana, eu próprio protocolei uma nova denúncia por crime de responsabilidade, baseada em fatos e documentos relacionados ao caso Banco Master. André Mendonça, por sua vez, passou a ser alvo de acusações depois de tornar públicos elementos da investigação. O presidente do STF, Edson Fachin, não tratou essas acusações como verdade pronta e determinou manifestações antes de decidir os próximos passos. Colocar artificialmente as duas situações no mesmo nível seria um absurdo. Se amanhã existir denúncia formal contra André Mendonça ou contra qualquer outro ministro, que ela seja examinada individualmente, com fundamento, provas, contraditório e devido processo. MAS O IMPEACHMENT DE MORAES NÃO PODE SER CONDICIONADO AO IMPEACHMENT DE NINGUÉM. Presidente Davi Alcolumbre, espero que essa notícia seja inverídica. Se não for, digo com toda clareza: O SENADO FEDERAL NÃO É BALCÃO DE NEGOCIAÇÃO. Impeachment não é moeda de troca. A Constituição não admite “impeachment cruzado”. Cada autoridade responde pelos próprios atos. Analise o pedido contra Alexandre de Moraes pelos fatos, documentos e fundamentos que estão protocolados. E DEIXE O SENADO DECIDIR. Qualquer tentativa de transformar uma competência constitucional dessa gravidade em composição política encontrará minha oposição. O SENADO PRECISA VOLTAR A SER SENADO. Senador Carlos Viana Minas Gerais
- Oct 17, 20269.0x their median
Não faremos o diabo pra ganhar a eleição, mas lutaremos até o fim. https://t.co/PMGRnAqGad
- Oct 17, 20265.5x their median
Ester Neves trabalha na Hering https://t.co/VEEOrySPPU
- Sep 9, 20265.3x their median
Nikolas Ferreira dá uma surra e derruba as narrativas fraquíssimas da Janja! "Todos sabem quem vc é, Janja"! Falou o q não devia, ouviu o q não queria!!! JANJA ATACA NIKOLAS E ELE RESPONDE… Nikolas Ferreira https://t.co/fdXRG9VtnU
- Sep 4, 20265.2x their median
🚨GRAVE: Caminhoneiros de todo o Brasil se mobilizam para uma possível greve em mensagens de grupos do zap Caminhoneiros estão se mobilizando para uma possível nova paralisação nacional. Entre as reivindicações estão o impeachment de Alexandre de Moraes e o apoio ao ministro André Mendonça. O movimento poderá ganhar força nos próximos dias e contar com manifestações em diferentes regiões do país.
- Sep 4, 20264.7x their median
Ta dificil mesmo! https://t.co/5jjzpzUR0p
- Oct 15, 20264.6x their median
Sometimes, you have to fall to discover how high you can rise.…🫑 https://t.co/1ISiJisY0U
- Oct 14, 20264.5x their median
Bora nessa, povo amazonense? 🤜🤛 https://t.co/b8cExoIOBN
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 307K followers, an engagement rate of 0.717%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.
- What is Pavão Misterious's engagement rate on X?
- Pavão Misterious (@misteriouspavao) has an engagement rate of 0.717%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 307,070 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.717%, Pavão Misterious sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @misteriouspavao have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @misteriouspavao post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.