Back to @misteriouspavao's profile

Pavão Misterious engagement report

@misteriouspavao - 307K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.717%
of 307K followers
Per impression
12.2%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
5.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.139%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 307K followers, an engagement rate of 0.717%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pavão Misterious's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.717%, Pavão Misterious sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 151 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 202613x their median

    It's so sad that we now live in a world where advertising such products has become a necessity. https://t.co/DMjIAe8Ljg

    25K3.7K3812805.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202612x their median

    Galera reta final, compartilhem por favor! Votem Flavio Bolsonaro! https://t.co/to1iul4aWH

    18K7.6K11173100K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20269.2x their median

    NOTA OFICIAL Recebo com absoluta perplexidade a notícia de que estaria sendo cogitada pela Presidência do Senado a abertura de um suposto “impeachment cruzado” envolvendo os ministros Alexandre de Moraes e André Mendonça. ESPERO SINCERAMENTE QUE ESSA INFORMAÇÃO NÃO SEJA VERDADEIRA. Seria uma aberração institucional transformar impeachment em instrumento de compensação política. Não existe “um ministro de cada lado”. Não existe empate. Não existe troca. EXISTEM FATOS, PROVAS E RESPONSABILIDADES INDIVIDUAIS. Há anos o Senado recebe sucessivos pedidos de impeachment contra Alexandre de Moraes. Nesta semana, eu próprio protocolei uma nova denúncia por crime de responsabilidade, baseada em fatos e documentos relacionados ao caso Banco Master. André Mendonça, por sua vez, passou a ser alvo de acusações depois de tornar públicos elementos da investigação. O presidente do STF, Edson Fachin, não tratou essas acusações como verdade pronta e determinou manifestações antes de decidir os próximos passos. Colocar artificialmente as duas situações no mesmo nível seria um absurdo. Se amanhã existir denúncia formal contra André Mendonça ou contra qualquer outro ministro, que ela seja examinada individualmente, com fundamento, provas, contraditório e devido processo. MAS O IMPEACHMENT DE MORAES NÃO PODE SER CONDICIONADO AO IMPEACHMENT DE NINGUÉM. Presidente Davi Alcolumbre, espero que essa notícia seja inverídica. Se não for, digo com toda clareza: O SENADO FEDERAL NÃO É BALCÃO DE NEGOCIAÇÃO. Impeachment não é moeda de troca. A Constituição não admite “impeachment cruzado”. Cada autoridade responde pelos próprios atos. Analise o pedido contra Alexandre de Moraes pelos fatos, documentos e fundamentos que estão protocolados. E DEIXE O SENADO DECIDIR. Qualquer tentativa de transformar uma competência constitucional dessa gravidade em composição política encontrará minha oposição. O SENADO PRECISA VOLTAR A SER SENADO. Senador Carlos Viana Minas Gerais

    16K3.1K872137195K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20269.0x their median

    Não faremos o diabo pra ganhar a eleição, mas lutaremos até o fim. https://t.co/PMGRnAqGad

    17K2.8K28479127K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20265.5x their median

    Ester Neves trabalha na Hering https://t.co/VEEOrySPPU

    10K1.1K54664169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.3x their median

    Nikolas Ferreira dá uma surra e derruba as narrativas fraquíssimas da Janja! "Todos sabem quem vc é, Janja"! Falou o q não devia, ouviu o q não queria!!! JANJA ATACA NIKOLAS E ELE RESPONDE… Nikolas Ferreira https://t.co/fdXRG9VtnU

    9.1K2.3K11159310K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20265.2x their median

    🚨GRAVE: Caminhoneiros de todo o Brasil se mobilizam para uma possível greve em mensagens de grupos do zap Caminhoneiros estão se mobilizando para uma possível nova paralisação nacional. Entre as reivindicações estão o impeachment de Alexandre de Moraes e o apoio ao ministro André Mendonça. O movimento poderá ganhar força nos próximos dias e contar com manifestações em diferentes regiões do país.

    9.0K1.7K672140139K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.7x their median

    Ta dificil mesmo! https://t.co/5jjzpzUR0p

    8.5K1.8K583861K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20264.6x their median

    Sometimes, you have to fall to discover how high you can rise.…🫑 https://t.co/1ISiJisY0U

    9.0K1.0K126462.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20264.5x their median

    Bora nessa, povo amazonense? 🤜🤛 https://t.co/b8cExoIOBN

    7.0K2.8K1205930K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 307K followers, an engagement rate of 0.717%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Pavão Misterious's engagement rate on X?
Pavão Misterious (@misteriouspavao) has an engagement rate of 0.717%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 307,070 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.717%, Pavão Misterious sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @misteriouspavao have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @misteriouspavao post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going