Back to @mie9n's profile

مدار engagement report

@mie9n - 289K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.159%
of 289K followers
Per impression
2.56%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
6.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
461
interactions (median)
Saved
0.484%
87 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 461 interactions against 289K followers, an engagement rate of 0.159%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

مدار's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.159%, مدار sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video20% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 142 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 20265.9x their median

    لكنني صبور يا اللّٰه وضعت يديّ فوق قلبي مئات المرّات في الليالي التي مَضت يدُكِ أرحم من يديّ وعطفك ولطفك أعظم من خوفي وقلقي.

    2.0K68531468K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20265.4x their median

    لا تنسى أن تُشرِق ولكن!* في المَكان الذي يُحب نورَك.

    2.0K48351473K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.6x their median

    بادر بادر بادر حتى لو المكان اللي بتدخله مكتوب عليه بالأحمر (نحن لا نبيع الماء) اسالهم ما تدري، يمكن أحد يسمعك ويعطيك، ويمكن السياسة تغيرت واللافتة قديمة وممكن يتعاونوا معك وأنا هنا لا أتحدث عن الماء إنما عن فرص الحياة بشكل عام، لا تسكر الطريق بوجهك بدون ما تحاول.

    1.9K215191180K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.6x their median

    كيف أقنعك أن غايتي كلها من الحب هي إيجاد الونس الذي افتقدته طيلة حياتي؟ رجلُ أميل بتعبي عليه فيحملني بكل قوة رجل انظر إلى عينيه فلا أجد إلا أنا كل مرة أنا فقط غايتي أن نتشارك ليالي الوحدة الثقيلة ولحظات السعادة أن نكون أنا وهو في وجه الدنيا معً لا أن يكون هو و الدنيا عليّ.

    1.4K22731743K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    لا مشغولة ولا زعلانة بس صرت اختار راحتي انا انسانة أحب نفسي.

    1.1K1635335K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.1x their median

    « برفقة الشخص الذي تُحبه/ في مكانٍ بعيد » https://t.co/d6wO4sDP4f

    79016831634K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.7x their median

    « الحنيّة الحنيّة الحنيّة » https://t.co/P6wLrX7L0T

    759380563K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.6x their median

    ——واجهني بالحقيقة—— قُل أنك لم تُحبني قُل أن رفقتي كانت جميلة ولكنني لم أكُن الفتاة التي أحببتها أخبرني الحقيقة/ أنني رائعة بالتأكيد، فاتنة، ذكية، مُثقفة وقُل أيضًا تلك الحقيقة التي بداخلك قلها لنفسك أولًا قل أنك اخترتني بيأس وأنني مهما فعلت لن يمتلأ مكان الذين غادروا قبلي.

    689591122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.6x their median

    كُل ما أريده منكِ أنّ نحب بعضنا بطريقة لا تجعل أيًا منا أن يذهب إلى فراشه وفي صدره الكثير مِن الأشياء التي يود قولهَّا.

    666781120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.6x their median

    «أحببتك لأنني علمت روعة أن يكون شخصٌ آخر معي في كلمة أنا» — سراديب العاشقين https://t.co/UL4Djjftcl

    669633422K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 461 interactions against 289K followers, an engagement rate of 0.159%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

What is مدار's engagement rate on X?
مدار (@mie9n) has an engagement rate of 0.159%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 289,443 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.159%, مدار sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mie9n have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mie9n post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going