Back to @michalkarnowski's profile

Michał Karnowski 🇵🇱 engagement report

@michalkarnowski - 145K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.066%
of 145K followers
Per impression
1.17%
8.2K views on a typical post
Reach
5.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
96
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.73/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.5K interactions, about 78x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Michał Karnowski 🇵🇱's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.066%, Michał Karnowski 🇵🇱 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link24% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 341 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 202678x their median

    Ludzie giną za naszą granicą, drony latają, a polska prawica przeżywa, że dzieciaki w szkołach mają jeść nie tylko mięso, ale też warzywa. Przecież to jest obłęd.

    5.8K64596434194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202635x their median

    @wlodekczarzasty: Zobaczcie, co dała nam Unia Europejska. Jeżeli ktoś tego nie widzi, to jest albo z PiS-u, albo z Konfederacji, albo od Nawrockiego, albo jest idiotą. https://t.co/FYxWT7Yge8

    1.6K4991.2K62115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202633x their median

    Nawet w bardzo podzielonym środowisku są, a właściwie były, pewne zasady wzajemnej grzeczności. Gdy dziennikarze innych mediów prowadzą transmisję, to nie wchodzi im się w kadr, nie przeszkadza. Republika wzywa do szanowania jej dziennikarzy. To szanujcie innych. https://t.co/9zaghFTVzk

    2.9K841354162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202627x their median

    Życiówka :) Uprzedzając standardowe pytania i wątpliwości. 1. Nie na hulajnodze. Biegłem, tak jak ponad 300 innych razy zarejestrowanych na Stravie. 2. Nie zacząłem ani nie skończyłem przy domu. 3. Tętno wysokie, ale to rekord. Rekordy chyba zwykle tak mają :) https://t.co/xfg59vvEWJ

    2.4K121587253K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202626x their median

    Dziękuję Wam wszystkim za wsparcie! To więcej niż pomoc - dzisiejszy dzień pokazał mi jak wielka moc jest w ludziach bliskich. Dziękuję przyjaciołom, którzy wspierali mnie i moją rodzinę. Dziękuję @RepublikaTV i tysiącom wspaniałych widzów! Taka wspólnota nie może przegrać! Dni karykaturalnej dyktaturki są policzone!

    1.8K494143830K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202619x their median

    Koncern Paramount Skydance kupuje Warner Bros. Discovery, do którego należy Grupa TVN. Nowym szefem połączonego giganta zostanie David Ellison. Transakcja ma być sfinalizowana na przełomie IX i X 26r. Pytanie najważniejsze: czy wreszcie zniknie szczujnia TVN??? Może doczekamy‼️‼️ https://t.co/kO3lzX9XfI

    1.4K382612080K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202610x their median

    Nikt już nie broni Sakiewicza i jego powiązań z mafijną Zondacrypto, jeśli nie ma w tym jakiegoś interesu. Najlepszy przykład: @michalkarnowski. Od wczoraj uaktywnił się w obronie konkurencji. Ale zapomniał Wam powiedzieć, że ma własny interes w podważaniu ustaleń śledztwa dotyczącego Zondacrypto. Po pierwsze - Karnowski ma kanał na Youtube, który prowadzi spółka Trzej Muszkieterowie. Ale muszkieterów jest tak naprawdę czterech. Bo wspólnikiem Karnowskiego, @TulickiMarcin i Michała Adamczyka jest Artur Chodziński. Po drugie - Karnowski Wam tego nie powie, ale Chodziński duże pieniądze (ponad pół miliona) zarobił na pracy dla Zondy i Krala. Czy te pieniądze zainwestował w kanał Karnowskiego? Wiem, ale zostawię Was z tą zagadką. Łączcie kropki. Po trzecie - czy Karnowski, Tulicki i Adamczyk mają spółkę z człowiekiem, który zarabiał, pracując dla człowieka związanego z mafią? Tak. Po czwarte - czy Artur Chodziński, po ujawnieniu przez nas z @MichalFuja jego kłamstw, manipulacji i prób wykorzystywania polityków prawicy do swoich interesów jest obciążeniem dla trzech muszkieterów? No raczej! W ubiegłym tygodniu u Chodzińskiego było policyjne przeszukanie. Oprócz koszulki Atalanty Bergamo, która miała trafić do Karola Nawrockiego, zabezpieczono wiele nośników i dokumentów, które mogą być niewygodne dla Karnowskiego i kolegów. Pamiętajcie o tym czytając jego kolejne wpisy lub oglądając jego programy. https://t.co/QbmwfrZTGO

    8917022464K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20267.3x their median

    Nowe pensje w Urzędzie Marszałkowskim Województwa Dolnośląskiego. 24 tysiące miesięcznie dla kierowników, tysiąc mniej dla ich zastępców 💰 https://t.co/GNn5zHzKQZ

    51512950935K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20267.3x their median

    Recenzja „Lalki” Netflixa - Maślona, żebyś skonał. Jakie to jest beznadziejnie głupie, źle zagrane, jeszcze gorzej wyreżyserowane, beznadziejnie sfilmowane. Jakże można uwierzyć, że w takiej Łęckiej ktokolwiek mógł się zakochać?

    5795164953K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20267.3x their median

    Mocne to jest! Posłuchajcie posła Michała Wójcika @mwojcik_. Umorzenie Zondy w kluczowych sprawach przez ludzi Żurka - kilka dni później Zonda sponsoruje imprezę Tuska z von der Leyen, a chwilę potem były wybory europejskie. Bardzo śmierdzi. https://t.co/QNxIXACXr7

    4381798127.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.5K interactions, about 78x its own typical post.

What is Michał Karnowski 🇵🇱's engagement rate on X?
Michał Karnowski 🇵🇱 (@michalkarnowski) has an engagement rate of 0.066%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 145,069 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.066%, Michał Karnowski 🇵🇱 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @michalkarnowski have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @michalkarnowski post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going