Back to @mfu46's profile

🇺🇸محمد|MFU engagement report

@mfu46 - 320K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.098%
of 320K followers
Per impression
1.34%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
7.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
312
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 312 interactions against 320K followers, an engagement rate of 0.098%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

🇺🇸محمد|MFU's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.098%, 🇺🇸محمد|MFU sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 232 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20263.8x their median

    - وزارة الخزانة الأمريكية تفرض عقوبات على بنك مصر الإمارات، بالإضافة إلى عقوبات على مدير بنك ملي في دبي، رضا محمد تأييدي، إلى جانب شركة واجهة مقرها هونغ كونغ ساعدت في غسل أموال لصالح شركة صرافة إيرانية خاضعة للعقوبات.

    9821592415128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.4x their median

    ترامب : إذا قام الإيرانيون بالرد، فسأقوم بمحوهم من الوجود.

    9386439557K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.0x their median

    ترامب : إذا خسرنا الانتخابات النصفية 2026، فالديمقراطيون سيرفعون الضرائب، وسيفتحون الحدود، وسيكون هناك تحول جنسي للجميع. https://t.co/DsyXRfEpYu

    8286525350K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.5x their median

    المراسلة : هل تستبعد استخدام الأسلحة النووية على إيران؟ ترامب : نعم، استبعد ذلك، لأنه لا حاجة لذلك، لقد هزمناهم عسكريًا تماماً. وسؤالك بصراحة غبي جداً. اهزمهم تماماً ومن ثم استخدم سلاح نووي؟ يا له من سؤال غبي. https://t.co/8AQkqwMsSY

    7016418665K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.5x their median

    ترامب : الإيرانيون يرغبون بخروج 0 برميل نفط من مضيق هرمز، لكن بالأمس وحده، 15 مليون برميل نفط عبر من مضيق هرمز. https://t.co/oynKEvKWYM

    6906613134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.2x their median

    وزير الخزانة الأمريكي يهدد قادة النظام الإيراني : سأقول هذا على شاشات التلفزيون حول العالم، حتى يكون الأمر واضحًا لكم، نحن نعرف أين توجد حساباتكم في جزر العذراء البريطانية، لدى شركات إدارة الأمانات. ونحن نعرف المنازل التي تبلغ قيمتها مئة مليون دولار التي تملكونها حول العالم، وسنقوم بمصادرة كل ذلك. سنلجأ إلى شركائنا، وسنغلق كل ذلك. سنلاحق الأصول غير المشروعة للنظام التي سرقها من الشعب الإيراني، ويمكن أن تعود هذه الأموال إلى الشعب الإيراني، أو يمكن أن تذهب إلى ضحايا الإرهاب.

    595819355K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.1x their median

    - الاتحاد الأوروبي ينضم رسمياً إلى عملية "المنبوذ الاقتصادي" التي أطلقتها الولايات المتحدة ضد إيران. https://t.co/mH1uXZlYhY

    569857222K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.0x their median

    وزير الخارجية الأمريكي ماركو روبيو : ارتكبنا خطأً فادحًا في هذا البلد، منذ زمن ليس ببعيد. وكان ذلك الخطأ قائمًا على فكرة أن القدرة على تصنيع الأشياء لم تعد مهمة، وأنه لم يعد مهمًا أين يتم تصنيعها. كان من المفترض أن تُصنع الأشياء في المكان الأكثر كفاءة، وبأقل تكلفة ممكنة. وكان هذا يعني أرباحًا أكبر للشركات، وتكاليف أقل للمستهلكين، وهكذا كان من المفترض أن يعمل العالم. كانت هناك، في الحقيقة، خيالية مفادها أن العالم بأسره سيصبح ديمقراطيات تقوم على اقتصاد السوق الحر، وأن الجميع سيصبحون مثلنا. لكن ذلك اصطدم بالواقع، بالواقع الذي يقول إن هذه ليست الطريقة التي سارت بها الأحداث البشرية على الإطلاق. فالدولة القومية لا تزال مهمة، والقومية لا تزال حقيقة واقعة، والحدود الوطنية لا تزال مهمة، والدول ستتصرف دائمًا بما يخدم مصالحها. وعلى مدى عقود، احتضنت واشنطن العولمة بينما اختفت المصانع، وانتقلت القدرة الصناعية إلى الخارج، وأصبحت أمريكا أكثر اعتمادًا على أكبر منافسيها في الأشياء التي نحتاج إليها. فازت أمريكا في الحرب الباردة، ثم اتخذت قرارات سلّمت أجزاءً هائلة من القوة الاقتصادية والصناعية التي ساعدتنا على الفوز بها. الحدود مهمة، وعمال أمريكا مهمون، والاستقلال مهم. والآن، تتمثل المهمة في عكس هذه الأخطاء التي فعلناها.

    54752241164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.0x their median

    المراسل : ما رد فعلك على الأخبار الأخيرة التي تفيد بأن الأمير هاري وميغان غادرا الولايات المتحدة؟ ترامب : أنا سعيد بذلك. لم أكن من المعجبين بهما، فقد اعتقدت أنهما عاملا العائلة المالكة بقدر كبير من عدم الاحترام، ولو كنت من العائلة المالكة فلن أرضى بعودتهم https://t.co/rUkiu9f985

    583338880K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.0x their median

    البيت الأبيض ينشر خريطة لمضيق هرمز، بعد تغيير اسمه لـ "مضيق ترامب". https://t.co/4yAdLDDjF7

    5296623944K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 312 interactions against 320K followers, an engagement rate of 0.098%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

What is 🇺🇸محمد|MFU's engagement rate on X?
🇺🇸محمد|MFU (@mfu46) has an engagement rate of 0.098%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 319,614 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.098%, 🇺🇸محمد|MFU sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mfu46 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mfu46 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going