Back to @metaversejoji's profile

joji engagement report

@metaversejoji - 266K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.065%
of 266K followers
Per impression
0.852%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
7.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
171
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.13/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 171 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.065%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.852% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #btcb.

Compared with accounts its own size

joji's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.065%, joji sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,969 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,068 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 175 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 202621x their median

    having a job is like holding 0.00001 % of a shitcoin while you work your bags the hardest and the dev owns 99% of the supply and only he is allowed to sell plus your tokens are locked until you’re 65 and by then the dev has already rugged the project

    3.0K43412057204K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202613x their median

    if you're having a bad day Closed my $neiro position only 5 days before it got listed on Binance Held for 2 months, would have been $2k -> $3m trade if I held it just five more days https://t.co/F9maQLJKPI

    1.9K6321618209K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202611x their median

    Seeing a lot of very young ppl with high unrealized gains, quick thought If you make $500K on a memecoin or whatever here and you're 20 years old, walk away It'll be super tempting to try and flip that into $5 million and make crypto into your career and life's purpose, but you've already won You have time and compound interest on your side. If you put that $500K into the most boring boomer stocks and live your life as if crypto didn't exist then: When you turn 27 your account will be $1 million, when you're 34, $2 million (top-1% of all households) You'll have bankable skills, good friends, less stress At 34 you'll still be super young and your friends'll be like "how the hell are you so rich?" You'll say you bought a dumb memecoin 14 years ago and instead of gambling more, you listened to Untamed Adam's advice and took the generational win

    1.5K8518744241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20266.2x their median

    499$ and a dream https://t.co/ktegIIJsW7

    95324756103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.6x their median

    one key mistake I’ve learned a lot from myself & other people last cycle early bull you need to be delusional and moon boy your belief bags into oblivion don’t wait for a new ceiling because you might have the next ceiling breaker and it will be your retire play and then you have to do the exact opposite when everyone is used to 100M-500M-1B-5B coins that’s when you have to start taking profit agressive because ceilings will only lower from there something a lot of you might end up doing the opposite so thought i’d share be delusional when others are reasonable be reasonable when others are delusional

    8186360980K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.8x their median

    Anyone try copytrade "dev"? I always see him buying tokens early https://t.co/8GpE6NgCMS

    7393942577K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.2x their median

    think it’s important to talk about the losses biggest roundtrips: $450k on nothing token (no ticker) $250k on fwog $650k on trump (solana txns weren’t going through so i sold 3x what i wanted to when melania dropped) $650k on ordinals $200k on billy $400k on cyberleek just straight losses: $250k on crypto valleys $100k a few times on random shit (mustard, chill guy, ) and many more that ive erased from my memory lol all a part of the journey. will have many more, but hopefully less over time.

    60419891094K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.9x their median

    What kind of shit these people smoking https://t.co/8zZ2QSd9oj

    4201014782424K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20261.9x their median

    I'm personally fading, might regret it but I see so many good coins like $ZZZ at $13m I rather take the gamble there as those chains are already more liquid It's one thing to chase the 2nd new chain, but it's another thing to chase the 4th chain looking for a piece of the pie

    2831222144K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20261.7x their median

    Most people skip LPing on Robinhood because it looks too complex. So we made the first step simple. Delta Academy is now live. Learn the basics, understand how LPing works, then open your first LP position on Delta. Start here: https://t.co/3jmk0onsBw https://t.co/SyIcub9i81

    21128481125K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#btcb

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 171 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.065%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.852% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is joji's engagement rate on X?
joji (@metaversejoji) has an engagement rate of 0.065%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 265,705 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.065%, joji sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @metaversejoji have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @metaversejoji post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going