melissa andress engagement report
@melissandress - 649K followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 315 interactions against 649K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 3.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 131x its own typical post.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
melissa andress's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.049%, melissa andress sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 48% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 74 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 4, 2026131x their median
Gomita súper buena onda: Oye, que felicidad que se sumó Jumex, que padre porque en mi temporada en lugar de llegar se iban JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJ https://t.co/1HWamHPYP1
- Aug 31, 2026122x their median
Lola latorre sacó una marca de electrolitos y, no solo copio toda la estética de rhode, sino que le copió hasta las mismas campañas, misma pose todo. No se le cae una neurona de creatividad. https://t.co/cxLo8BP7r6
- Aug 2, 2026121x their median
para ustedes el shampoo y el acondicionador son corte mejores amigos? o que vinculo tienen?
- Aug 25, 202680x their median
Las señoras grababan a Luis como si estuviera en un zoológico: Señora: “está comiendo” Señor: “si, está comiendo” Señora: “me está viendo” JAJAAJAJAJ 🐒 https://t.co/IKdl6va5UK
- Sep 17, 202677x their median
https://t.co/DO6pOILefV
- Aug 9, 202671x their median
14 years ago, MARINA released ‘How to Be a Heartbreaker’ https://t.co/vZWdJvjc8c
- Sep 28, 202669x their median
su codicia fue su perdición, ahora pasara ahí el resto de sus días. https://t.co/UpJGzmtBXL
- Sep 4, 202633x their median
Estoy mirando sex and the City desde cero de nuevo y que escándalo de hombre que es Big por favor se entiende perfectamente porque Carrie hizo todo es el peor hombre que conociste en tu vida pero yo hubiera hecho lo mismo te digo
- Aug 28, 202629x their median
La historia ya hizo este experimento; el caso de Lindsay Clancy es un calcado al de Constance Fisher. En 1954, Constance ahogó a sus tres hijos en una tina después de afirmar que escuchaba voces y que estaba paranoica. Fue declarada no culpable por razón de locura y fue encerrada en un hospital estatal. La declararon mejor después de unos años y la dejaron salir del hospital estatal. En 1966, después de tener tres hijos más, ahogó a los tres también. ¡Ciertamente una tragedia completamente evitable! En 2023, Lindsay Clancy estrangula a Cora, Dawson y Callan con bandas de ejercicio y admite que lo hizo. Toda la defensa es que estaba demasiado loca para ser responsable, y si el jurado lo acepta, no va a prisión, va a un hospital psiquiátrico que la revisará anualmente para su liberación. Esta no es una historia nueva… Es la misma con nuevos nombres y una década diferente. Si alguna vez dejan que Lindsay Clancy camine libre, recuerda a Constance Fisher.
- Sep 22, 202617x their median
Mariana Ochoa se convierte en la primera finalista de la cuarta temporada de la casa de los famosos mx es hora de bailar shabadabada https://t.co/JSg1pKEmQc
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 315 interactions against 649K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 3.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 131x its own typical post.
- What is melissa andress's engagement rate on X?
- melissa andress (@melissandress) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 649,345 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.049%, melissa andress sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @melissandress have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @melissandress post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.