Back to @melaninglamour's profile

melanin mermaid🧜🏽‍♀️ engagement report

@melaninglamour - 164K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.009%
of 164K followers
Per impression
0.436%
3.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
15
interactions (median)
Saved
0.175%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 0.436% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 1709x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #need, #that.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #need, #that.

Compared with accounts its own size

melanin mermaid🧜🏽‍♀️'s engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, melanin mermaid🧜🏽‍♀️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 63 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 26, 20251709x their median

    That's the first time I've seen her mad💀 https://t.co/mJPZiQCwPl

    22K2.0K8708243.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20261273x their median

    Reggie explains why he crashed out on the internet was simply for a quick viral moment that he got paid $28M for, says Kai Cenat and Clover Boys were all in on it 😬 “Cant believe everything you see on the internet its all entertainment chat” “We’re all good” https://t.co/b1sA9jEvTV

    18K4845381696.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026904x their median

    Is that what 🌽 really do to your brain? https://t.co/GtGEHOh5yC

    13K728355538K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026673x their median

    Nike is one of the biggest failures in the last 15 years for this reason… https://t.co/OZxWixTxTF

    8.8K957256134354K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026550x their median

    ASAP Rocky's cut verse from Drake's 2013 track "WU TANG FOREVER" https://t.co/Zh7JeWdraR

    7.2K75295249890K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026487x their median

    them bisexual vampires bit his neck 🤦🏽‍♂️

    6.5K6956497119K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026368x their median

    I don't know if it's a prank or real https://t.co/9sLbFb1T0w

    5.0K36112320236K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026242x their median

    Had to mute that “black men are hard to love” tweet, you not about to upset me on my own phone.

    3.2K367857245K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026152x their median

    That's actually the funniest prank video of all time. At least top 5 https://t.co/maVm13JnKi

    2.1K12329256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026151x their median

    Fat women are art

    1.6K434311691.5M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#need#that

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 164K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 0.436% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 1709x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #need, #that.

What is melanin mermaid🧜🏽‍♀️'s engagement rate on X?
melanin mermaid🧜🏽‍♀️ (@melaninglamour) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 163,719 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, melanin mermaid🧜🏽‍♀️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @melaninglamour have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @melaninglamour post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going