Back to @megbasham's profile

Megan Basham engagement report

@megbasham - 220K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.169%
of 220K followers
Per impression
1.58%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
10.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
370
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.9/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 370 interactions against 220K followers, an engagement rate of 0.169%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 96x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Megan Basham's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.169%, Megan Basham sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video54% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 54% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 294 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 202696x their median

    Me, checking who my two pilots are before I sit down: https://t.co/f74ZvQSz5D

    34K1.8K155901.4M viewsView on X
  • Apr 16, 202438x their median

    For years, the American Church has been overrun with leaders who are selling out their ministries to the highest bidders, giving wolves access to their sheep in exchange for elite respectability. Rather than the truth of Scripture, high-profile pastors are preaching trendy social causes and reaping the spoils of the media's adulation. The left's march through the institutions has brought it to the last bastion--the Church--and if it could, it would bring that edifice, too, toppling down to serve its political purposes. Who is being bought and who is doing the buying? Why are our seminaries training students to be climate change activists and social justice warriors? Why are the Bible's instructions for handling accusations being thrown out while "trauma experts" are being brought in? You've had your suspicions. Now you will have answers. I've spent the last two years investigating the capitulation, compromise, and propaganda peddling. I'm naming names and bringing receipts. I have received cease and desist threats from one of the country's most powerful law firms. My publisher has received letters from major ministries asking for meetings about their "concerns." Backroom powerbrokers have tried to discredit and derail my project. By God's grace, they've all failed. You WILL learn which leaders and ministries are pimping their pulpits, cozying up to leftist sugardaddies, and embracing the world's oldest profession. Coming this July. Preorders open. https://t.co/5bEt4ljei5

    9.4K2.8K1.5K4403.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202638x their median

    Great job by ESPN airing the entire Enter Sandman experience! https://t.co/oDvyGPSVHN

    13K925165191890K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202626x their median

    I have a friend who is marrying rich. She is extremely sweet and gentle. She is going to be a great wife and mom. When she told me she got engaged, she was also speaking about how her fiance had said she didn’t have to work. She mentioned this almost in a whisper and said she felt bad. There was pressure coming from her (boomer) mother and an implication she was failing for choosing to be a stay at home wife and mom. She’s college educated after all! So I sold it to her as a privilege, as prestigious, as a responsibility. It’s high-class, wealth, status. Since then she’s quit her job to focus on the wedding and the marriage. Huge weight off her shoulders, she’s much happier. When she told me she quit her job she was again almost embarrassed but I just smiled and encouraged her. A lot of women are begging for permission to stop pretending they are a girl boss. They are driving themselves crazy because they don’t see a viable off ramp from the feminist girl boss indoctrination that allows them to save face socially. So when I get a chance I elevate this. I wonder how to do it at scale.

    8.9K39837079429K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202616x their median

    Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his faithful servants. ~Psalm 116:15 Miss you Charlie. https://t.co/rV4fZdRprZ

    5.8K11235344K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202614x their median

    what would you do if a woman my age admitted she was scared of ending up alone? I really want to know. https://t.co/0U4DtzK9hg

    763334.3K211416K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202611x their median

    Using em dashes in 2026 is a status symbol — a sign of not living in fear

    3.6K4118263122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20267.1x their median

    Is anybody else wondering if the lone juror has any idea that he has a massive fan base on X?

    2.5K6882233K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.7x their median

    25 years ago today, humanity mourned. Palestine cheered. Savages. https://t.co/QWeKcj5Uqv

    1.9K4269466232K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.9x their median

    A reply under my post about Charlie on Instagram. THIS is what it’s all about. Charlie endured all the sneers and name-calling to win treasures in Heaven!! Sola Deo Gloria. 😭❤️ https://t.co/kNmbvXF5TH

    2.0K13119320K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 370 interactions against 220K followers, an engagement rate of 0.169%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 96x its own typical post.

What is Megan Basham's engagement rate on X?
Megan Basham (@megbasham) has an engagement rate of 0.169%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 220,482 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.169%, Megan Basham sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @megbasham have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @megbasham post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going