Back to @mayawiley's profile

Maya Wiley engagement report

@mayawiley - 397K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 397K followers
Per impression
0.929%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
66
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 397K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 0.929% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 348x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #vote.

Compared with accounts its own size

Maya Wiley's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Maya Wiley sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link44% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 213 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 14, 2026348x their median

    ICE has shot and killed 10 people since Trump came back into office. 2 more in the last week. In addition, 50 people have died in ICE detention. ICE has become a killing machine. We cannot let this feel normal. It isn't. https://t.co/lqlbMi59L3

    12K5.0K6.1K374209K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 2026298x their median

    BREAKING: Epstein survivors release powerful PSA urging Senators to vote NO on Todd Blanche's nomination. https://t.co/UnTohs09NI

    13K6.1K324231434K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026203x their median

    The victim that was shot and killed by ICE in Maine has been identified as Joan Sebastian Guerrero. Guerrero had a 3-year-old daughter, was authorized to work in the US, was given a Social Security number, and was not the target of ICE's immigration action. https://t.co/wn0ykI2FGJ

    12K1.6K163111383K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202681x their median

    Sen. Ossoff: Tonight, Donald Trump, the world's most famous sore loser, will deliver a prime time presidential sour grapes address to pursue his 6-year-old grievances about the 2020 election. https://t.co/Hiz3ZDK0Dk

    3.8K86465956116K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 2026176x their median

    How can you not smile? https://t.co/xbJK8HmMcP

    4.2K336077254K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202636x their median

    We are not ok: “The men claiming to defend women’s sports are throwing sex toys at female athletes” https://t.co/82UXERxsQl

    1.9K399311723K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 202414x their median

    My memoir, REMEMBER, YOU ARE A WILEY, is out 9/17/24. The title is my grandmother’s command. Its meaning is what shaped me. Pre-Orders here: https://t.co/Gh66u8QDJj https://t.co/RT1Djt8xKO

    64515913214203K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202614x their median

    BREAKING: A federal judge just ruled in another case exposing Todd Blanche’s dishonesty and incompetence, this time over the slush find and bogus immunity deal. This is just the latest proof that he chooses to serve Trump over the American people. https://t.co/SybHboPV2z

    621291856.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202612x their median

    The absolute cruelty and breaking of faith in public health research! All because this administration hates diversity & refuses to even consider understanding why Black ppl have twice the risk of Alzheimer’s. #Vote like your life depends on it! https://t.co/pCXXA68Zvd

    5712348616K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20267.0x their median

    Last night on #PoliticsNation, I reflected on the decision to abandon the long-awaited effort to place Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill. Harriet Tubman risked her life to lead others to freedom, served this nation during the Civil War, and spent years fighting simply to receive the pension she had earned. Recognizing her on our nation’s currency was never just about changing a design. It was about acknowledging a history that helped shape America. The way we choose to remember our history says a great deal about the values we choose to uphold. We cannot allow the contributions and sacrifices of those who expanded the promise of freedom to be minimized, erased, or forgotten. #MSNOW

    3251043139.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#vote

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 397K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 0.929% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 348x its own typical post.

What is Maya Wiley's engagement rate on X?
Maya Wiley (@mayawiley) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 397,163 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Maya Wiley sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mayawiley have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mayawiley post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going