Back to @max_katz's profile

Максим Кац engagement report

@max_katz - 361K followers on X

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.312%
of 361K followers
Per impression
1.75%
64K views on a typical post
Reach
17.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 361K followers, an engagement rate of 0.312%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 1.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.9K interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Максим Кац's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.312%, Максим Кац sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link32% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 32% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 266 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 20267.0x their median

    На Сахалине честно посчитали УИК. КПРФ — 35% ЕР — 29% ЛДПР — 11% НЛ — 9% Явка 29% https://t.co/21OvtouJgi

    7.6K16013032384K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20265.6x their median

    https://t.co/cwFz7eonPz

    5.9K427184260K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.3x their median

    Москву дорисовывают в бумаге. ДЭГа не хватило в этот раз https://t.co/y5XFL4n4bU

    5.7K148599192K viewsView on X
  • Mar 24, 20265.2x their median

    Люблю иногда вечером зайти на Госуслуги https://t.co/sgsANkZtcw

    4.3K5273282K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.4x their median

    Судя по данным которые из Питера, там ЦИКу или Горизбиркому придётся перерисовывать результаты прям с нуля. Очень активно там за яблочников голосуют

    3.7K6552799K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.1x their median

    П О С Т А Н О В Л Е Н И Е 1. Движение единорогов обратно созвать 🦄, 2. Единый оппозиционный список на выборах в ГД максимально распространить, 3. За разъяснениями направлять людей на мой сайт https://t.co/m4V5cgyyoS Кац

    3.1K23816524169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.8x their median

    После долгой и сложной политической работы мы согласовали между основными политическими и медийными силами, оппонирующими Путину, стратегию на выборах. Долго говорили. В основном все согласились с планом, кто-то не согласился но сказал что будет не против. Потом долго сидели со списками. Не ставили тех, кто поддерживает войну, призывали почти за всех яблочников. Кое где оставили тех, кто может выиграть округ но не идеален. В итоге получили один общий список. И мы презентуем его вместе с Юлией Навальной сегодня https://t.co/XS0lPSnQso

    2.7K13327597237K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.6x their median

    Смешной округ в Питере: https://t.co/SgsVC4QlW3. Там согласована к проходу оказалась коммунистка, и рисовали за неё (точно также как за единороссов в остальных округах). Но один УИК перепутал! И нарисовал за единоросса, причём сразу 100% явку https://t.co/XY0Z5nG8Gy

    2.8K47617151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.4x their median

    Друзья из Екатеринбурга! Когда пойдёте голосовать, сфоткайте, пожалуйста, красиво бюллетень с вычеркнутым фломастером яблочником (у вас там их в последний момент сняли) и запостите. Должно очень показательно выглядеть

    2.6K39606155K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 20263.2x their median

    Когда сократил бюджет на политтехнологов: https://t.co/qKgpyHFs64

    2.5K579012103K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 361K followers, an engagement rate of 0.312%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 1.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.9K interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

What is Максим Кац's engagement rate on X?
Максим Кац (@max_katz) has an engagement rate of 0.312%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 361,319 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.312%, Максим Кац sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @max_katz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @max_katz post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going