Back to @mauriciostycer's profile

Mauricio Stycer engagement report

@mauriciostycer - 335K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 335K followers
Per impression
1.39%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
149
interactions (median)
Saved
0.019%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 335K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #quemamacuida, #emergência53, #opinião.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #quemamacuida, #emergência53, #opinião.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mauricio Stycer's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, Mauricio Stycer sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video9% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 9% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 144 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 2, 202637x their median

    Neymar provocando Edson, do Remo, procurando o nome do jogador na camisa para saber quem é. 🎥 @TNTSportsBR | nodetalhecontent_ (IG) https://t.co/eEAg4NNoMh

    4.3K886945001.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202615x their median

    Vale a pena prestigiar O Povo Quer Saber dessa semana com dois farmadores de aura profissionais. 👉https://t.co/XueteHCxTG https://t.co/MBVEip565P

    2.0K155403483K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20269.6x their median

    Da @revistapiaui: Um político familiarizado com o mercado financeiro contou à Piauí, sob a condição de manter seu nome sob anonimato para não minar suas relações, que Fabio Faria tornou-se “o cara mais importante do Vorcaro” https://t.co/WDV8WsiKB3

    1.2K1621412216K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.7x their median

    Que série ruim é Jogada de Risco. Personagens toscos, histórias bobas, dramas sem pé nem cabeça, uma história de vingança novelesca e idiota. Atores perdidos. Impressionante o desperdício.

    84730872771K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.7x their median

    Tatá Werneck ganhou um grande papel em #QuemAmaCuida e não desperdiçou a oportunidade. Está bem demais.

    7992923512K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20265.7x their median

    Onde jogavam os jogadores titulares do Brasil na final Copa de 62?🤔 Gilmar (Santos) Djalma Santos (Palmeiras) Mauro (Santos) Zózimo (Bangu) Nilton Santos (Botafogo) Zito (Santos) Didi (Botafogo) Garrincha (Botafogo) Zagallo (Botafogo) Vavá (Palmeiras) Amarildo (Botafogo) https://t.co/I7dMRGNW6N

    75464201649K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.8x their median

    Muita gente falando sobre The Wire. Não entendi o motivo, mas coloco na roda um texto velho. Em 2021, já lamentava a queda na qualidade das séries e citava o impacto de rever a obra de David Simon: “Foi como voltar a um lugar que parece não existir mais.” https://t.co/8gHDiCHaJ7

    64242201218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.5x their median

    #PorVocê começou com uma vibe Vai na Fé. Achei a alegria e a felicidade de alguns personagens um tom acima. Mas isso pode ser coisa de capítulo de estreia. Novela solar, com muita paisagem da zona sul do Rio. Sheron x Aline promete. Acidente no fim foi choque de realidade. Bom.

    6311810430K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.1x their median

    A @revistapiaui traz também os bastidores de uma raríssima entrevista, no SBT, em que Flavio Bolsonaro foi questionado sobre Vorcaro. Diante de protestos do assessor do presidenciável, a entrevista foi encerrada com o apoio do diretor de jornalismo do SBT https://t.co/WDV8WsiKB3

    377724444K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.9x their median

    Uma coisa é a televisão aberta, outra é o YT https://t.co/gTsYF8x9Vz

    327196825151K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#quemamacuida#emergência53#opinião#porvocê

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 335K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #quemamacuida, #emergência53, #opinião.

What is Mauricio Stycer's engagement rate on X?
Mauricio Stycer (@mauriciostycer) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 335,481 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, Mauricio Stycer sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mauriciostycer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mauriciostycer post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going