Back to @mauriciostycer's profile

Mauricio Stycer engagement report

@mauriciostycer - 334K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.037%
of 334K followers
Per impression
1.56%
8.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
124
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 334K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 72% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 45x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #opiniao, #ntvnox, #opinião.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #opiniao, #ntvnox, #opinião.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mauricio Stycer's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.037%, Mauricio Stycer sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link72% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 72% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 143 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 2, 202645x their median

    Neymar provocando Edson, do Remo, procurando o nome do jogador na camisa para saber quem é. 🎥 @TNTSportsBR | nodetalhecontent_ (IG) https://t.co/eEAg4NNoMh

    4.3K886945001.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202626x their median

    Sou time Maria Cristina Fernandes. Pelo que leio aqui, a GloboNews pode ter se precipitado na "correção" de uma informação que ela deu.

    2.9K30303154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202618x their median

    Vale a pena prestigiar O Povo Quer Saber dessa semana com dois farmadores de aura profissionais. 👉https://t.co/XueteHCxTG https://t.co/MBVEip565P

    2.0K155403483K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202618x their median

    Mônica Bergamo: Meta derruba perfil de série com Porchat sobre relações entre Master e Igreja Lagoinha https://t.co/iCMemfdGvp

    1.8K318845565K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202614x their median

    Vai voltar! https://t.co/bGAUwXrXST

    1.6K91443233K viewsView on X
  • Mar 22, 202613x their median

    Kevin Marques, filho de Kassio Nunes Marques, tem ligação com consultoria que recebeu 18 milhões de reais da JBS e do Master Por @brenopires Leia: https://t.co/mHj80ONoFP https://t.co/hifVVrMpjx

    1.2K356202397K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202612x their median

    Da @revistapiaui: Um político familiarizado com o mercado financeiro contou à Piauí, sob a condição de manter seu nome sob anonimato para não minar suas relações, que Fabio Faria tornou-se “o cara mais importante do Vorcaro” https://t.co/WDV8WsiKB3

    1.2K1621412216K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.1x their median

    Que série ruim é Jogada de Risco. Personagens toscos, histórias bobas, dramas sem pé nem cabeça, uma história de vingança novelesca e idiota. Atores perdidos. Impressionante o desperdício.

    85330882873K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20267.9x their median

    Os assuntos estão se cruzando de forma alucinada hoje. Bocardi diz que 'demitiu SBT da sua vida' e liga genro de Silvio Santos a escândalo https://t.co/lCWh7QQPgo

    8905524517K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20266.9x their median

    Onde jogavam os jogadores titulares do Brasil na final Copa de 62?🤔 Gilmar (Santos) Djalma Santos (Palmeiras) Mauro (Santos) Zózimo (Bangu) Nilton Santos (Botafogo) Zito (Santos) Didi (Botafogo) Garrincha (Botafogo) Zagallo (Botafogo) Vavá (Palmeiras) Amarildo (Botafogo) https://t.co/I7dMRGNW6N

    75464201649K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#opiniao#ntvnox#opinião#quemamacuida

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 124 interactions against 334K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 72% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 45x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #opiniao, #ntvnox, #opinião.

What is Mauricio Stycer's engagement rate on X?
Mauricio Stycer (@mauriciostycer) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 334,426 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.037%, Mauricio Stycer sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mauriciostycer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mauriciostycer post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going