Back to @matsutake_cat's profile

まつたけ engagement report

@matsutake_cat - 205K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.89%
of 205K followers
Per impression
8.08%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
23.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.134%
64 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 205K followers, an engagement rate of 1.89%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 8.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

まつたけ's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.89%, まつたけ sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 47 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 202620x their median

    ヤドンのぬいぐるみを仲間だと勘違いしてる子猫の頃のまつたけ https://t.co/hYVo28Xovx

    74K4.0K2049948K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202613x their median

    エアコンのガンガン効いた部屋でタオルケットに包まれて寝るのが至高なのを分かってる 温室育ちのまつたけ https://t.co/7TCaHFpoi6

    48K3.3K3654899K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202613x their median

    2歳児に見つからないよう 牛乳パックに擬態する かくれんぼ上手なおすし https://t.co/iUy9sBntvk

    48K2.7K1730629K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202611x their median

    夏の暑さにウンザリしてる まつたけ https://t.co/OgXBKnRBiJ

    41K1.7K2633557K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202610x their median

    かくれんぼして飼い主に見つかると嬉しそうな まつたけ https://t.co/meys7nJLuE

    39K1.3K1713368K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20268.8x their median

    世界一かわいい もぐらたたき https://t.co/hGS1xlee28

    31K2.9K7445979K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20268.3x their median

    ひんやりベッドでツチノコになっちゃった まつたけ https://t.co/k1XCQoET9B

    31K1.5K1426473K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20266.5x their median

    生きてるか心配になるレベルの子猫の寝顔 https://t.co/kJ3vo2GEh4

    24K1.2K1124456K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20266.3x their median

    猫によって飼い主の待ち方にも個性があって面白い https://t.co/41xIuNg27R

    23K1.3K1912280K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20266.1x their median

    飼い主の邪魔をすることが自分の仕事だと思ってる てんぷら https://t.co/ieuQGBHdxN

    23K6991322205K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.9K interactions against 205K followers, an engagement rate of 1.89%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 8.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is まつたけ's engagement rate on X?
まつたけ (@matsutake_cat) has an engagement rate of 1.89%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 205,331 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.89%, まつたけ sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @matsutake_cat have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @matsutake_cat post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going