Back to @martinpugliese's profile

Martín Pugliese engagement report

@martinpugliese - 46K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.974%
of 46K followers
Per impression
7.65%
5.8K views on a typical post
Reach
12.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
444
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 444 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.974%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 7.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 90x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #diadelaraza.

Compared with accounts its own size

Martín Pugliese's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.974%, Martín Pugliese sits above the 75th percentile of the 218,727 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.706% to 2.63%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.706%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,727 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,722 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.706%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video5% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 5% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 279 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 1, 202090x their median

    El argentino promedio piensa que: El pobre es bueno y el rico es malo. El inquilino es bueno y el locador es malo. El empleado es bueno y el empleador es malo. Lo estatal es bueno y lo privado es malo. Hago votos para que algún día dejemos de ser tan imbéciles. ¡Feliz año! 🥂

    29K9.0K1.1K657View on X
  • Sep 20, 202612x their median

    🇵🇸🇨🇺VIDEO COMPLETO: ESTUDIANTES COMUNISTAS DE FILOSOFÍA Y LETRAS UBA AGREDEN Y CENSURAN https://t.co/yexxs8scZH

    4.1K67936147205K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20268.6x their median

    Perdón que insista, pero sigo sin entender a los "republicanos" que pasan las 24 hs puteando a @JMilei, como si Argentina tuviese a algún Reagan oculto como opción. Pero no, del otro lado están Massa, Kicillof y Grabois, frotándose las manos. Maduren muchachos. No sean pelotudos.

    3.0K5981882644K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20264.9x their median

    Una de las cosas más maravillosas que nos traerá el 2027 es la finalización del mandato de los legisladores de la Coalición Cívica. Nunca más.

    1.9K23345618K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20263.3x their median

    En este nuevo #DiadelaRaza, no importa si sos blanco, negro, amarillo o mestizo. Lo importante es no ser un pelotudo como este egresado de la Universidad de San Andrés, que acaba de proponer una alianza con Juan Grabois y Myriam Bregman. https://t.co/8YtNS4ruV5

    1.1K3117059.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20263.2x their median

    Durante los próximos 12 meses, la Patria socialista buscará evitar A TODA COSTA la reelección de Milei, e inundará el país con su tradicional repertorio de operaciones, fake news, marchas, paros, tomas, estadísticas truchas, violencia y victimización. Será en vano. Gana Milei.

    1.1K2573369.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.1x their median

    El objetivo de Hamás/Irán no fue violar y matar mujeres delante de sus hijos, pegarle tiros en la nuca a todos los nenes de un jardín de infantes, o prender fuego a familias enteras. Esos fueron "gustos" que se dieron, para garantizar la reacción israelí. El verdadero objetivo era asegurarse la adhesión europea a su causa. Y lamentablemente lo lograron. Con creces.

    1.1K26629453K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.0x their median

    Si la población argentina debiera optar entre @JMilei y Hugo Chávez, el 40% elegiría a Chávez. Ahí está nuestro riesgo país.

    1.2K11227513K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262.9x their median

    🚨URGENTE🚨 Se vienen dos informes lapidarios de la @AuditoriaAGN. Uno sobre las SIRAS y el otro sobre las compras del Estado en la pandemia! Sería muy lindo que fuera verdad, pero la AGN (un organismo decorativo si los hay) nunca auditó ni una cosa ni la otra. ¿Pueden creerlo?

    1.1K22816412K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.9x their median

    En los 80s, los medios usaban "extrema derecha" para referirse a algún skinhead marginal que había reivindicado a Hitler, pedía asesinar extranjeros, o cosas así. Hoy, los cráneos de @LANACION lo usan para aludir a quienes pensamos -por ejemplo- que no existen mujeres con pene.

    1.1K2192039.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#diadelaraza

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 444 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.974%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 21,625 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 7.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 90x its own typical post.

What is Martín Pugliese's engagement rate on X?
Martín Pugliese (@martinpugliese) has an engagement rate of 0.974%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 45,627 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.974%, Martín Pugliese sits above the 75th percentile of the 218,727 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @martinpugliese have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,625 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @martinpugliese post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going