Mark Minervini engagement report
@markminervini - 767K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 558 interactions against 767K followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 0.571% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Mark Minervini's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.073%, Mark Minervini sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 50% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 47% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 47% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 705 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 1, 202612x their median
I've been a stock trader for 43 years. Based on my experience, the market will never outsmart me and take my capital during bear markets or sky rocket without me onbosrd for the ride during bull markets. That sounds very arrogant, doesn't it. But wait until you hear the reason why. Because I never try to outsmart the market. What i have learned is humility. The market is always right. And if I am yielding to its message, I can never be outsmarted by the very force I am respecting and staying in gear with. There's a fortune in this one paragraph.
- Sep 21, 20267.1x their median
I’ve had this on the wall in my office for almost 20 years, and I still read it every morning https://t.co/lgBA5pIzoo
- Sep 1, 20266.4x their median
If you want to succeed in life, you need to learn to think and act independently of the good opinion of others. No one cares about your future as much as you do. No one is coming to make you successful. No one is going to make you rich. That’s your responsibility. You have to make decisions based on your own passions, your own dreams, your own goals, and your own tolerance for risk—not based on what someone else thinks you should do. And yes, that includes your parents, your kids, your spouse, your friends—and society. Listen to advice. Consider opinions. Learn from people you respect. But ultimately, you have to live your life—not the life other people have chosen for you. If you want uncommon results, you have to be willing to make decisions that other people may not understand, approve of, or agree with. Your life. Your decisions. Your consequences. Your future.
- Sep 3, 20265.8x their median
I have two major trading rules: 1. No forced trades. 2. No big losses.
- Sep 25, 20265.5x their median
If AI can trade stocks so well, why are all these AI-managed portfolios at Fidelity, Schwab and elsewhere struggling to even beat the S&P 500? And where are the AI portfolios winning the U.S. Investing Championship? Backtests and predictions are easy. Show me the audited, real-money results. That’s where the bullshit stops. The answer is because it can't. There is zero evidence of any enduring or consistent results from purely AI or computer manager portfolios that can even outperform the S&P 500. Fact.
- Oct 14, 20204.3x their median
The 5 biggest mistakes I made when I first started trading https://t.co/scg1vLp2WJ
- Jan 19, 20234.1x their median
Quote of the day... https://t.co/Y8pmyAyuUm
- Aug 27, 20264.0x their median
Quote of the Day In trading, closing many trades that would have gone higher if you had held is a necessary part of succeeding. When you reach a crossroads and have to decide whether to hold or fold, amateurs tend to roll the dice and hold. Pros usually play it safe and fold. — Mark Minervini
- Aug 19, 20263.5x their median
The hard rotation in technology is wreaking havoc on many recent breakout names. A number of former leaders that suffered significant declines rallied quickly back up their right sides, but that rapid recovery created another problem: technical time compression combined with substantial overhead supply. When a stock suffers a large decline and then races back up in a quick V recovery, it may look strong on the surface, but the structure underneath can still be vulnerable to sharp volatility. There simply hasn't been enough time for the stock to properly repair the technical damage, shake out weak holders, and work through the supply created during the prior decline. We're seeing the consequences of that now as some of these stocks experience sharp pullbacks. The question is what happens next. Do these former leaders find support, tighten up and begin constructing legitimate right sides to their bases? Or is the current weakness the beginning of another leg lower and a continuation of the correction? At this stage, there is no reason to guess. The best course of action is to avoid questionable structures that haven't had sufficient time to develop proper pivots. A stock moving rapidly back toward its highs does not automatically mean it has built a sound base or offers a low-risk entry. Particular caution should be exercised with stocks that have suffered declines of 45% or greater in a relatively short period and then rallied rapidly back into overhead supply. These situations can produce powerful rebounds, but they can also create significant volatility as trapped shareholders use the strength to get out near breakeven. Let the stocks prove themselves. The strongest names will absorb the supply, hold important support levels, tighten their price action and eventually present properly developed setups. If they can't do that, there is no reason to force the trade and play right into the hands of volatility. Time is an important ingredient in technical repair. Don't confuse a fast recovery with a completed base, and don't confuse volatility with alpha. https://t.co/FfBnR93ojq https://t.co/TFyCpPHZis https://t.co/JXzFFTmMtn
- Sep 3, 20263.5x their median
When the best setups don't work, you don't go to the worst setups... you go to cash.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 558 interactions against 767K followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 0.571% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
- What is Mark Minervini's engagement rate on X?
- Mark Minervini (@markminervini) has an engagement rate of 0.073%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 767,193 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.073%, Mark Minervini sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @markminervini have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @markminervini post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.