PlayerSells
Back to @mariobautista_'s profile

Mario Bautista engagement report

@mariobautista_ - 4.9M followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 4.9M followers
Per impression
2.32%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
0.71%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
804
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 804 interactions against 4.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 2.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.706% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 169K interactions, about 210x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mario Bautista's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Mario Bautista sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.006% to 0.046%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.319%
p902.64%
p99357.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,789 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 446,562 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.319%
90th percentile2.64%
99th percentile357.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+7%+4% to +9%7.2K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 71 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 7% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 27, 2026210x their median

    como pensaba que iba a ser mi vida cuando cumpliera 18 https://t.co/tovSliqzSv

    146K22K1864581.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20263.1x their median

    Quiero llorar alv

    2.1K236179851K viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20262.9x their median

    Nuevo corte βœ‚οΈ https://t.co/ZHZlGKdKz6

    1.8K1692982223K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20261.8x their median

    Ya empezamos a mandar DMS o que ? 😏πŸ”₯ PARTY CON PRADA πŸ—£οΈ

    351571.0K214K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.7x their median

    πŸ‡²πŸ‡½πŸ‡²πŸ‡½πŸ‡²πŸ‡½πŸ‡²πŸ‡½πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ https://t.co/G4ZNQwCeq7

    1.2K9874226K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20261.5x their median

    MΓ‰XICO NO PARA DE GANAR Y PRADA VIENE EN CAMINO πŸ˜› QUIΓ‰N SE JALA AL CALIFA A CELEBRAR CON NOSOTROS πŸ‡²πŸ‡½πŸ‡²πŸ‡½πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ https://t.co/le6ovLCApp

    1.0K100105339K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20261.5x their median

    ESO MΓ‰XICO CHINGADAMADREEEEEE QUΓ‰ MANERA DE ARRANCAR πŸ‡²πŸ‡½πŸ‡²πŸ‡½πŸ‡²πŸ‡½

    97615389417K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 2026

    TΓΊ me caes bien mamasita, estoy que te muerdo esa boquita. https://t.co/tYJ2wD8L9z

    779165251721K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 2026

    QuΓ© hacΓ­a yo colocando tantas comas donde iba un punto ?

    803204152721K viewsView on X
  • May 10, 2026

    Siempre ustedes πŸ₯° https://t.co/KB4Zqnhqss

    822124160312K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 804 interactions against 4.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 2.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.706% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 169K interactions, about 210x its own typical post.

What is Mario Bautista's engagement rate on X?
Mario Bautista (@mariobautista_) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,907,876 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Mario Bautista sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @mariobautista_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @mariobautista_ post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going