Back to @marcoscastro's profile

Marcos Castro engagement report

@marcoscastro - 659K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.189%
of 659K followers
Per impression
7.36%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
2.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 659K followers, an engagement rate of 0.189%. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 7.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 34x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.189%, Marcos Castro sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 31 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 5, 202634x their median

    Não tem a porra de um jogador esgotado Não tem a porra de um jogador chorando desolado Ninguém deu a vida Ninguém teve câimbra Otários fomos nós de acreditar

    38K3.8K144136430K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20268.0x their median

    Faz o L https://t.co/xQGhBzdWU4

    9.6K286792298K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20207.9x their median

    Vc percebe que os Mamonas Assassinas marcaram sua vida quando você se esforça pra tirar uma foto com os amigos pelados em Santos https://t.co/qkjnKjSl1S

    9.3K275130110View on X
  • Jul 6, 20267.0x their median

    Saudades de quando a gente já sabia que o nosso atacante driblaria o goleiro Esse recurso foi simplesmente expurgado do nosso DNA de quinze anos pra cá https://t.co/I2rKgxkxjx

    8.1K43712750107K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20263.2x their median

    Pergunta para os seguidores brasileiros: agora que o Brasil foi eliminado, vão torcer por quem?

    1.1K152.8K192211K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20262.8x their median

    Remanescentes na Copa do Mundo, divididos por grupos: Grupo A: 🇲🇽 Grupo B: 🇨🇭 Grupo C: 🇧🇷🇲🇦 Grupo D: 🇺🇸 Grupo E: Grupo F: Grupo G: 🇧🇪🇪🇬 Grupo H: 🇪🇸 Grupo I: 🇫🇷🇳🇴 Grupo J: 🇦🇷 Grupo K: 🇨🇴🇵🇹 Grupo L: 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

    3.4K718594K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.0x their median

    Ahh o futebol… O Bayern de Munique está enfrentando neste momento o Jeju FC da Coreia do Sul em amistoso realizado em Suwon, e olhe o que o desconhecido atacante brasileiro Matheus Aiás, atacante do time coreano aprontou!!! Assistência do ano?! https://t.co/Dx3A9m0i04

    2.4K1281226252K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20261.8x their median

    Quem viu, viu Quem não viu, não verá mais A partir de agora as Copas do Mundo se resumirão a França x qualquer outra seleção na final. Às vezes vão perder, mas provavelmente ganharão boa parte das Copas do futuro. Não tem nada que as outras seleções possam fazer pra mudar isso.

    1.8K55329107510K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.6x their median

    Não adianta a gente acreditar no futuro da seleção brasileira se o futuro da seleção brasileira tá sendo criado em massa pra ser vendido como ponta pra uma liga europeia É dinheiro pro clube formador, é salário que muda a vida do jogador, mas o Brasil seguirá com uma geração de 55 pontas de alto nível e o resto aos pedaços Se a mudança não começar na base, não vai ser no profissional que vamos ver solução

    1.8K15223326K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 2026

    🇧🇷 Rodrigo Caetano, dirigente da CBF, sobre a continuidade de Ancelotti na Seleção: “O que nos gera uma esperança para o próximo ciclo é a certeza de uma continuidade para fazermos alguns ajustes e chegarmos mais fortes na próxima Copa.” 🎥 @simpraisa https://t.co/1zBIqghvex

    1.3K3732453151K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 659K followers, an engagement rate of 0.189%. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 7.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 34x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Marcos Castro's engagement rate on X?
Marcos Castro (@marcoscastro) has an engagement rate of 0.189%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 658,717 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.189%, Marcos Castro sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @marcoscastro have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @marcoscastro post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going