Back to @marcos_galperin's profile

Marcos Galperin engagement report

@marcos_galperin - 523K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.00%
of 523K followers
Per impression
1.98%
265K views on a typical post
Reach
50.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.085%
224 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 523K followers, an engagement rate of 1.00%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,954 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 265K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 50.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Marcos Galperin's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,954 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.00%, Marcos Galperin sits above the 75th percentile of the 38,255 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.44% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.44%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 38,255 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,671 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.44%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%54K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%53K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%44K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%55K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%73K
10:00 UTC-2%76K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%91K
13:00 UTC-2%100K
14:00 UTC-3%103K
15:00 UTC-2%106K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%96K
18:00 UTC-1%90K
19:00 UTC-2%85K
20:00 UTC-1%79K
21:00 UTC-1%70K
22:00 UTC-2%61K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%240K
Monday0%306K
Tuesday-3%311K
Wednesday-2%262K
Thursday-2%252K
Friday-3%261K
Saturday+3%235K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20267.2x their median

    South Africa without white people to rule. 🇿🇦 What took white, European settlers approximately 300 years to build, took the ANC 30 years to destroy. Will Europe look the same in 20 years? https://t.co/3FL6miMI3t

    29K6.8K1.6K5831.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.9x their median

    Miren como titulaba Clarin con Massa... https://t.co/ImExjt3r5j

    13K2.3K143127361K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    Hoy esta atendida magistral a un boludo de Revista Barcelona cumple cuatro años. https://t.co/64PqeGg6Kb

    9.0K9238514246K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    🟣 Acá está la telemetría de la sanción a Franco La sanción es claramente ridícula y acá van las razones: - Franco viene transitando mucho más rápido que Tsunoda desde la curva 13 y comienza a preparar la maniobra de superación (previo al accidente) - Viene detrás del auto de Yuki, sin visibilidad sobre el auto de Max y transitando por fuera sobre la pista mojada. Mientras el RB lo hacía sobre el radio ideal de giro con pista seca. - Tsunoda y Franco frenan prácticamente en el mismo momento, pero Tsunoda mantiene el pie sobre el freno durante más tiempo (y más fuerte) para esquivar el neumático de Max. - Franco suelta el freno y acelera para continuar por fuera, superando a Yuki en ese mismo momento. La sanción con quita de puntos de la superlicencia indica que la razón es por superar al auto 22 durante un mini sector con doble amarilla. Ni siquiera es por "no levantar" o "no levantar lo suficiente", es por ADELANTAR a Yuki. Si Franco frenaba más fuerte transitando con pista mojada y por fuera (para no adelantar a Yuki) iba a ser bastante más peligroso. De hecho, fue su declaración post carrera. Frenar fuerte un auto de F1 transitando a 200 km/h por el sector externo de una curva y con pista mojada no tiene sentido. Lo mismo aplica a Lindblad quien recibe la misma sanción que Franco por adelantar, en este caso, a Gasly. Falta mucho criterio por parte de los comisarios para entender lo que sucede en un auto de F1 a esas velocidades y circunstancias.

    6.0K1.2K17998284K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    A highly organized criminal operation in South Africa has dismantled and stolen nearly 10 kilometers of active railway track, inflicting an estimated $2.3 million in infrastructure damage. The perpetrators operated with professional, engineering-level precision, leaving no room for error. Yet, despite the massive logistical destruction, the stolen rails are expected to yield a mere $120,000 on the illicit scrap metal market. The immediate fallout has paralyzed local rail services, stranding vital freight and passenger trains. The operational halt has placed the future of the rail depot in jeopardy, threatening the livelihoods of workers whose jobs are now at risk. Beyond the immediate economic impact, this sabotage deals a massive blow to the national mobility of the South African people, as well as businesses and industries reliant on rail to move cargo and materials. While addressing this crisis should be a top priority for the Ramaphosa administration, its reluctance to act decisively reflects embarrassing incompetence. Ultimately, this incident highlights the escalating crisis of metal theft in South Africa, where the systemic stripping of essential infrastructure has evolved into a catastrophic economic threat costing the country hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

    1.9K491454148115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    ¿IG de la delegada de La Bancaria? https://t.co/0TdfhahcYL

    1.8K95118351.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Otra iglesia histórica incendiada por musulmanes. Esta vez se trata de la iglesia de St Andrew’s en Inglaterra, que data de 1862. No van a parar. Van por todo. https://t.co/ELWVu3XaMe

    48415426621K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Casas Bahia pide recuperação judicial. Finalmente tiraron la toalla. R$17,3bn de deuda, 298 tiendas cerradas y ~3.000 despidos. Tasas altas + crédito caro + consumo flojo = sentencia para el retail de inventario + real estate. Los que tienen menos capital, más tiendas físicas y costos fijos altos van a seguir sufriendo. Mismo patrón que vimos en los bancos: sucursales vs. digitales. Espacio claro para $MELI y $SE. $AMZN también se beneficia, pero de forma más gradual: ya mejoró mucho la logística, pero todavía le falta el músculo de crédito propio (tanto a consumer como a merchant) que tiene Mercado Pago. El modelo de deep selection + precios bajos +logística + crédito sigue ganando. NFA DYOR

    8694477K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.2K interactions against 523K followers, an engagement rate of 1.00%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,954 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 265K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 50.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post.

What is Marcos Galperin's engagement rate on X?
Marcos Galperin (@marcos_galperin) has an engagement rate of 1.00%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 523,105 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.00%, Marcos Galperin sits above the 75th percentile of the 38,255 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @marcos_galperin have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,954 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @marcos_galperin post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going