Back to @marcos_galperin's profile

Marcos Galperin engagement report

@marcos_galperin - 532K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.417%
of 532K followers
Per impression
0.846%
262K views on a typical post
Reach
49.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.061%
160 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 532K followers, an engagement rate of 0.417%. Posts are seen about 262K times each, and 0.846% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 49.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026. Recurring tag: #isaias.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.417%, Marcos Galperin sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video57% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 254 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 202625x their median

    This could never happen in a communist society, or in the regulations and tax obsessed EU. This is Total American Capitalist Victory. https://t.co/MapBE7JFLo

    47K5.3K2.6K704902K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202617x their median

    South Africa without white people to rule. 🇿🇦 What took white, European settlers approximately 300 years to build, took the ANC 30 years to destroy. Will Europe look the same in 20 years? https://t.co/3FL6miMI3t

    29K6.8K1.6K5871.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.2x their median

    Miren como titulaba Clarin con Massa... https://t.co/ImExjt3r5j

    13K2.5K156139430K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20266.0x their median

    Son todos expertos en coberturas financieras y hace 2 semanas estaban marchando para que les paguemos la tarjeta de crédito

    11K1.9K17760399K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.5x their median

    Hoy esta atendida magistral a un boludo de Revista Barcelona cumple cuatro años. https://t.co/64PqeGg6Kb

    9.0K9298614271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.4x their median

    🟣 Acá está la telemetría de la sanción a Franco La sanción es claramente ridícula y acá van las razones: - Franco viene transitando mucho más rápido que Tsunoda desde la curva 13 y comienza a preparar la maniobra de superación (previo al accidente) - Viene detrás del auto de Yuki, sin visibilidad sobre el auto de Max y transitando por fuera sobre la pista mojada. Mientras el RB lo hacía sobre el radio ideal de giro con pista seca. - Tsunoda y Franco frenan prácticamente en el mismo momento, pero Tsunoda mantiene el pie sobre el freno durante más tiempo (y más fuerte) para esquivar el neumático de Max. - Franco suelta el freno y acelera para continuar por fuera, superando a Yuki en ese mismo momento. La sanción con quita de puntos de la superlicencia indica que la razón es por superar al auto 22 durante un mini sector con doble amarilla. Ni siquiera es por "no levantar" o "no levantar lo suficiente", es por ADELANTAR a Yuki. Si Franco frenaba más fuerte transitando con pista mojada y por fuera (para no adelantar a Yuki) iba a ser bastante más peligroso. De hecho, fue su declaración post carrera. Frenar fuerte un auto de F1 transitando a 200 km/h por el sector externo de una curva y con pista mojada no tiene sentido. Lo mismo aplica a Lindblad quien recibe la misma sanción que Franco por adelantar, en este caso, a Gasly. Falta mucho criterio por parte de los comisarios para entender lo que sucede en un auto de F1 a esas velocidades y circunstancias.

    6.0K1.2K17998287K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.5x their median

    El primer mundo se empieza a enterar algo que en Argentina debimos haber aprendido hace mucho tiempo: los déficits fiscales eternos en algún momento se pagan. https://t.co/zUPHjiXrDj

    4.8K56120725204K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    A highly organized criminal operation in South Africa has dismantled and stolen nearly 10 kilometers of active railway track, inflicting an estimated $2.3 million in infrastructure damage. The perpetrators operated with professional, engineering-level precision, leaving no room for error. Yet, despite the massive logistical destruction, the stolen rails are expected to yield a mere $120,000 on the illicit scrap metal market. The immediate fallout has paralyzed local rail services, stranding vital freight and passenger trains. The operational halt has placed the future of the rail depot in jeopardy, threatening the livelihoods of workers whose jobs are now at risk. Beyond the immediate economic impact, this sabotage deals a massive blow to the national mobility of the South African people, as well as businesses and industries reliant on rail to move cargo and materials. While addressing this crisis should be a top priority for the Ramaphosa administration, its reluctance to act decisively reflects embarrassing incompetence. Ultimately, this incident highlights the escalating crisis of metal theft in South Africa, where the systemic stripping of essential infrastructure has evolved into a catastrophic economic threat costing the country hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

    1.9K491454148115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    En Argentina, todos hacemos más o menos el mismo flujo con la guita ¿no? Sueldo > depositado en Cuenta bancaria > Transferido a Mercadopago para que te rinda intereses > Vuelve al banco para pagar la tarjeta el último día del vencimiento.

    2.1K3523523262K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Comparto esta nota que nos hicieron a semanas del lanzamiento hace 27 años. Parecía ciencia ficción pensar que se iba a poder comprar y vender sin salir de la casa (hoy se hacen +100 compras x seg). Hace menos tiempo pasó lo mismo con los pagos, préstamos e inversiones digitales. 🤝

    1.9K241108542K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#isaias

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.2K interactions against 532K followers, an engagement rate of 0.417%. Posts are seen about 262K times each, and 0.846% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 49.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Marcos Galperin's engagement rate on X?
Marcos Galperin (@marcos_galperin) has an engagement rate of 0.417%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 532,327 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.417%, Marcos Galperin sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @marcos_galperin have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @marcos_galperin post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going