Back to @marcofeliciano's profile

Marco Feliciano engagement report

@marcofeliciano - 887K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 887K followers
Per impression
3.95%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
384
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 384 interactions against 887K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 3.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Marco Feliciano's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, Marco Feliciano sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 200 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 20265.2x their median

    ISSO É MAU CARATISMO🚨 Caráter não se mede pelo rosto, pela aparência ou pelo poder. Se revela nas escolhas, na coragem e na fidelidade aos princípios que defendemos. Vote Pastor Marco Feliciano | 2️⃣2️⃣7️⃣0️⃣ Para Deputado Federal.✅ https://t.co/9riPtTvo7b

    1.5K3671221130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.7x their median

    Muitos perguntam pq eu não critico o Eduardo Bolsonaro por ter escolhido outra pessoa para ser candidato ao senado. Mas q tipo d pessoa eu seria ao atacar o filho de um amigo meu q está preso injustamente? Caráter vale mais q cargo!

    1.3K8166334K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.9x their median

    Depois de tudo o que já veio a tona e diante da forma absolutamente heterodoxa que foi levada adiante o julgamento do “golpe”, a pergunta que fica no ar é essa: Estão esperando o que para soltarem Bolsonaro???

    98811914114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.9x their median

    Fora Lula! E leva junto o diabo que te carrega!

    1.0K4748214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.8x their median

    Minha solidariedade aos 3.000 demitidos pela Casas Bahia. Mas Juiz do Trabalho não resolve desemprego mandando reintegrar. O problema é a economia! Recordes de impostos, gastos, dívida e juros, para sustentar a roubalheira lulo-petista.

    98776729.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.7x their median

    Casas Bahia entrou em concordata e fechou 300 lojas. Achei que Lula conseguiria esconder o caos econômico até a eleição. Começou a quebradeira. O tombo na economia será gigante. Dilma parecerá uma santa perto do que está por vir!

    938861719.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.4x their median

    De nulidade em nulidade, quem vai se anulando é o STF….

    851545016K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.1x their median

    NINGUÉM ESTÁ ACIMA DA LEI. O Congresso precisa assumir sua responsabilidade. As instituições precisam cumprir seu papel. E todos aqueles que exercem poder precisam lembrar: ninguém está acima da lei. https://t.co/ujKQbUu8Jd

    6451492418.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.1x their median

    Bom dia. Vc já foi à Suíça hoje? Essa é a pergunta que os 3 mil funcionários demitidos ontem pelas Casa Bahia gostariam de fazer a Lulinha.

    728702108.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.1x their median

    Quando a caminhada é construída com fé, história, amizade e propósito, ninguém caminha sozinho. Obrigado, @PastorMalafaia, pelo apoio e pela confiança! 🇧🇷 Vote Pastor Marco Feliciano | 2️⃣2️⃣7️⃣0️⃣ Para Deputado Federal.✅ https://t.co/QKMbwxQCyP

    67511614113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 384 interactions against 887K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 3.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

What is Marco Feliciano's engagement rate on X?
Marco Feliciano (@marcofeliciano) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 886,777 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, Marco Feliciano sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @marcofeliciano have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @marcofeliciano post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going